Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

WAYMO TEMPORARILY SUSPENDS SERVICE IN LOS ANGELES:

As Jim Geraghty writes, in a lengthy Morning Jolt titled, “L.A. Burns, Again,” “Waymo driverless vehicles run on lithium-ion batteries. According to the company, a battery involved in a fire or exposed to high heat levels will release toxic vapors, including sulfuric acid, oxides of carbon, nickel, lithium, copper, and cobalt. Our brave new world of driverless cars now provides malevolent actors with mobile toxic bombs on demand.”

Just a bit of fun though, from the DNC-MSM’s perspective:

ROGER SIMON: Thank God I Left California.

I left California in 2018 after having lived there since 1968. Many were doing the same then.

I have written about this move many times in books, articles, blogs and on this Substack. The subject has started to bore me. I didn’t want to hear about California. I barely commented about the fires that were so mishandled by the state and city’s incompetent leadership.

But with the demonstrations of the last few days, the protestors blocking the 101 as I type, burning cars and pelting police, I cannot hold back.

President Trump has done the right thing calling in the National Guard. Otherwise we could have a situation much like Minneapolis during the George Floyd riots, which was and is a national disgrace with decent men going to jail and that once-great Minnesota city turned into an open air sewer .

In much bigger California the results would likely be worse. The state is on the verge, or over the verge, of being the world’s biggest asylum for the criminally insane and arguably irredeemable.

What else can one say about escalating demonstrations in favor of keeping in our country (and their state) rapists, murderers, human traffickers, sexual predators, pederasts, batterers, violent gang members and drug cartels (to name a few)?

The Democrat Party, by defending these people, is continuing to implode at warp speed. James Carville must be on the edge of heart failure. Bill Maher may have to bite the bullet and switch parties with Karin Jean-Pierre. (He’ll probably just blame Trump to save his audience.)

The leadership of California is a litany of some of the most immoral politicians in the country, every one of them a hypocritical fake: Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Karen Bass, Reps. Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, and former VP Kamala Harris, among a raft of malignant narcissists in a one-party state.

Read the whole thing.

JIM TREACHER WISHES CNN LUCK WITH A CAPITAL-F: CNN Is a Riot.

CNN spent most of Saturday night smooching George Clooney’s culo because he wrote and performed a Boomer play about Journalism with a capital J, depicting events that happened 70 years ago.

Last year Clooney shoved Joe Biden out of the 2024 presidential race, after keeping his concerns about Biden’s dementia to himself until it was too late, so of course CNN rewarded him with a national platform to wag his finger at the rest of us about “truth.” CNN treated it like Oscar night, all while congratulating themselves on their #Resistance.

It was their best idea since CNN Plus.

At that very moment, Los Angeles was descending into chaos. And just like Edward R. Murrow would’ve wanted, CNN first ignored and then waved away the facts.

* * * * * * * *

This clown [Stelter] wants you to ignore that pesky little riot. “Look at all the cars that aren’t on fire!” It’s the same playbook the left used during the George Floyd riots, and it’s the opposite of journalism.

No wonder CNN is nostalgic for the 1950s, when the liberal media was the only game in town. Back then, they could’ve gotten away with this crap. Back then, America couldn’t see how the sausage is made.

As I wrote yesterday, no wonder CNN’s founder melted down so hard in 1996 when the concept of Fox News was first announced, and old media in general dived for the fainting couches when the first iteration of the Drudge Report debuted in the late-1990s, followed by the original Blogosphere. It’s somewhat ironic that CNN was simulcasting George Clooney’s Good Night and Good Luck from Broadway last night, as they would love to be Pravda in a nation without access to media with another worldview, or a platform like Twitter/X where it’s possible to see uncensored images and non-regime media approved opinions: CNN Has Always Hated the Competition.

Of course, sometimes on CNN, the left hand doesn’t know what the far left hand is doing:

(Classical reference in headline.)

OH, THAT VIOLENT LEFT:

Meanwhile, at CNN:

JAMES PIERESON on WFB: Buckley’s Life on the Firing Line. Review: Buckley: The Life and Revolution that Changed America by Sam Tanenhaus.

Buckley entered Yale in 1946, eager to make up for lost time (he had spent the previous two years in the Army) and to catch up with his brother, Jim, who had already graduated. He landed a spot on the debate team, alongside fellow student Brent Bozell, and by his third year was appointed editor of the Yale Daily News, where he published critical articles on the left-wing tilt of the faculty that got him into hot water with the administration. He would soon turn those articles, along with copious notes, into a best-selling book, God and Man at Yale, published in 1951 (after his graduation). The book claimed that Yale professors, in the name of academic freedom, were undermining Christianity and promoting collectivism by teaching Keynes and other liberal thinkers. He called upon alumni to withhold donations unless and until the university changed course.

The book was a sensation, as Tanenhaus writes, especially so for a young man with no other books to his credit. It was widely reviewed—McGeorge Bundy, a Yale graduate, wrote in the Atlantic that he found the book “dishonest in its use of facts, false in its theory, and a discredit to its author.” Others weighed in along the same lines. Buckley was unfazed and enjoyed the furor surrounding the book. He saw, as did others, that the critics missed the main point: The popularity of the book was due to its attack on the professional elites at Yale and elsewhere who pretended to be neutral and open in outlook but were in fact selling a point of view—namely, liberalism.

Buckley followed up with a new book, McCarthy and His Enemies, written jointly with Bozell, and published in 1954 just as McCarthy’s career was about to collapse in censure by the Senate. The book was not so much a defense of McCarthy as it was an attack on the security system in the State Department (and elsewhere) that allowed communists and fellow-travelers to penetrate the U.S. government. Critics panned the book because they disliked McCarthy, but that was partly the authors’ point: The communist issue was much larger than McCarthy.

With two controversial books under his belt, Buckley was by this time the acknowledged leader of a loose band of conservative writers that included Russell Kirk, James Burnham, Frank Meyer, Willmoore Kendall, and Whittaker Chambers. There was no political home for writers who were at once anti-communist and anti-statist. They were not welcome in the universities, certainly, nor in the Republican Party: Eisenhower had pushed aside their favorite (Robert Taft) for the presidential nomination, and once in office declared his support for the main themes of the New Deal and the containment doctrine favored by his Democratic predecessor.

In this circumstance, his friends prevailed upon Buckley to launch a new magazine that would at once articulate these two themes—anti-communism and anti-statism—and also unite the disparate band of conservatives around a single publication. They looked to Buckley as their leader for obvious reasons: He could debate; he had a name by virtue of his books; and, importantly, he had access to money through his father and his father’s friends. Buckley agreed to be editor of the weekly publication. The inaugural issue of National Review appeared in November 1955 with a bold statement of purpose from its editor: “[National Review] stands athwart history yelling Stop, at a time when no other is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.”

Buckley would serve as editor of National Review for the next 35 years, writing weekly columns, supervising the editorial pages, serving as referee for disputes among his writers, and, as Tanenhaus writes, trying to wall off unsavory elements (bigotry and anti-Semitism) from the magazine. Buckley denounced the John Birch Society, erstwhile allies in the anti-communist cause, for extremist claims—for example, that President Eisenhower was a communist.

As Russell Kirk famously quipped at the time, “Ike’s not a communist. He’s a golfer.

GREAT MOMENTS IN DEMOCRAT OPTICS:

ED MORRISSEY: ‘Mostly Peaceful’ 2.0: Another Great Moment in Protection Racket Media.

If this looks familiar, it’s because CNN used the same playbook as they did five years ago during the George Floyd riots:

MSNBC also used “mostly peaceful” as their motto in 2020, and the rest of the media followed suit, including and especially the coverage about the Twin Cities and the massive destruction that took place there. As John detailed in his post last night, there is a massive amount of violence sweeping through Los Angeles, much of it directed at legitimate law enforcement actions by the federal government. The local authorities didn’t lift a finger to stop it the first day, and it predictably escalated the second day.

Meanwhile, just like CNN and every single £$%^&% Protection Racket Media outlet did with Joe Biden’s cognitive incapacity for the last four years, they are going to tell you to trust them rather than your own eyes and ears. They will flat-out ignore the violence as long as they can’t use that violence to damage Republicans, and pretend that nothing’s happening as the city (or cities) burn. They want to paint the decision by Donald Trump to send in the National Guard to protect federal agents as somehow illegitimate, just in the same way these same media outlets told us that the evidence of Joe Biden’s senility was really just his “childhood stutter,” when it wasn’t “cheap fakes” and vicious Republicans making up stuff about President Sharp-As-A-Tack, Ring-Runner Around Youthful Aides.

No wonder CNN’s founder melted down so hard in 1996 when the concept of Fox News was first announced, and old media in general dived for the fainting couches when the first iteration of the Drudge Report debuted in the late-1990s, followed by the original Blogosphere. It’s somewhat ironic that CNN was simulcasting George Clooney’s Good Night and Good Luck from Broadway last night, as they would love to be Pravda in a nation without access to media with another worldview, or a platform like Twitter/X where it’s possible to see uncensored images and non-regime media approved opinions: CNN Has Always Hated the Competition.

THIS IS CNN: CNN’s Disgrace: This Is What They Call Journalism?

After Dana Bash notes (correctly, for once) that in the 1992 Rodney King riots, California’s Governor Pete Wilson — a Republican — requested the National Guard be activated, while on Saturday, President Trump activated the National Guard without such a request. She also notes that the last time a president unilaterally activated and deployed the National Guard was in Alabama in 1965.

Why did President Johnson send in the Guard in 1965? Because local authorities refused to enforce federal law.

Why did President Trump send in the Guard in 2025? Because local authorities refused to enforce federal law.

In both cases, you had local authorities either refusing to enforce federal law or actively defying federal law.

Senator Mullin defenestrated that comment.

Well, you’ve got two issues here. You’ve got a very weak, lawless, governor in Governor Newsom, who’s not enforcing the nation’s laws. And then you had a Biden administration for the last four years that didn’t enforce our immigration laws… Regardless of what they’re doing right now, they entered the country illegally, and therefore they are illegal, and they are criminals.

I don’t know why a governor would want to try to protect illegal activity inside a state. And the president has made it very clear, if the governor or the mayor of a city isn’t willing to protect the citizens of his state or the city, then the president will.

Which brings us to Dana’s real jaw-dropping assertion:

Dana Bash: I just want to state for the record that what did happen in 1992 was so different from what we’re seeing now. That was a real riot.

Dana, it’s not your job to state anything for the record. It’s your job to report. You’re interviewing a United States Senator. Let him state things for the record. Senator Mullin replied:

Dana, if you have people… You and I can look at this and we can obviously see that this is not under control. It’s not under control. You and I both can see that. And a riot is a riot. They’re throwing all types of objects at law enforcement. And the president’s absolutely right. It’s pretty bad.

The pictures, videos, and reporting, much of it right here on RedState, coming out of this disaster speak very eloquently on just how out of control this situation is.

It’s a good thing for Dana that nobody is watching this stuff: Cable News Ratings: Fox News More Dominant Than Ever, CNN A Non-Factor, Troubling Sign For MSNBC.

TELEVISION SETS: Kyle Smith on George Clooney’s adaptation of Good Night and Good Luck for Broadway. As Smith notes, “luxuriate in your fears for $300 a seat, which is the average price for tickets to George Clooney’s stage version of his 2005 film Good Night, and Good Luck (at the Winter Garden Theatre through June 8). Clooney, who seldom fails to remind interviewers that he is the son of a journalist, cowrote both the movie and the play with Grant Heslov, originally conceiving this hagiography of CBS News’s mid-century television drama queen Edward R. Murrow (played by David Strathairn in the movie and now by Clooney himself on Broadway) as a response to the George W. Bush* administration’s decision to make war in Iraq. Now, of course, the Red Scare Scare is pointing to Donald Trump:”

But his own script shows that Murrow was a preening, showboating editorialist. Positioning himself as merely an objective reporter, he strayed further and further into self-righteous, openly partisan grandstanding. Abandoning his bona fides as a war reporter, he became an on-air columnist on the program See It Now, deploying euphemism, half-truths, deliberate obfuscation, and other rhetorical maneuvers to engage in a public debate with McCarthy over his anti-Communist hearings. Far from being the opposite of today’s cable-news attention-seekers, he was essentially Rachel Maddow with a cigarette. (In an amusing montage of silly moments in television news played on a screen, the all-hysterics Maddow network gets dinged for pushing the Trump–Russia hoax, as do commentators who insisted President Biden was sharp as a tack before Clooney himself helped usher him into retirement via an open plea to step aside in The New York Times.)

Clooney simply can’t see how badly he undermines his own case here. After Murrow denounces McCarthy, CBS grants the senator equal time to respond, and McCarthy unloads on the newsman, noting that he led a Soviet “educational” front group and hence took paychecks from Moscow in 1934 while being a member of the Communism-lite group International Workers of the World. Rebutting the rebuttal on air, Murrow says nothing about serving as a Stalinist stooge in the educational group (because it was true) but issues a clipped denial of IWW membership. Oh? Wherever, then, could McCarthy have gotten the notion? Wrote Murrow’s biographer, A. M. Sperber,

To Ed Murrow, the IWW would always have the aura of the great lost cause, a soft-focus memory of stalwart men and great songs and failed native radicalism. . . . . [W]hile he alternately claimed or denied membership in later years—his lifelong favorite song would be “Joe Hill”—no one could ever prove he had or hadn’t carried the red card.

Er, if Murrow himself ever claimed membership in the IWW, McCarthy would appear to have had a decent reason to mention it, and the matter was certainly relevant to viewers who might have wondered whether Murrow’s thundering denunciations of the senator were based in ideological differences rather than objective reporting.

As is usually the case with those promoting the Red Scare Scare, the crux of the dispute is mere semantics; support for the immense evil that was Communism was to be waved away unless the ideologue in question went so far as to formally register as a member of the Party (a similarly fine distinction is at the heart of the movie Oppenheimer). The intellectual vapidity of this game is evident.

So Murrow was at least Communist-curious, and Carl Bernstein’s parents “were secret members of the Communist Party USA:”

“A case can be made that [Bernstein] should have disclosed the conflict of interest he brought to his Watergate exposes,” wrote New York media consultant Sidney Goldberg in 2003. “After all, he was brought up as a Nixon hater and readers might have been told that his family regarded Nixon as vile, as an enemy.”

As Zhou Enlai never said, “The French Revolution? Too early to say.”

* Speaking of which, wait, that George W. Bush? Oceania Has Never Been at War with East Dubya: Liz Cheney Pleads With George W. Bush to Take the Uniparty Plunge and Endorse Kamala.

Flashback: Legendary Hollywood Leftist Pines for the 1950s: Good Night, and Good Luck review: George Clooney makes his Broadway debut in a sleepy newsroom play.

And then there’s blacklist subtext of any film or play about McCarthy. That’s a topic that should never be touched by Hollywood again, since the industry has spent the last quarter century blacklisting anyone to the right of Stalin – and even blacklisting lefties who have made anti-blacklisting movies. Or as Glenn wrote in late 2020, “After a decade of seeing leftists doxxing people and getting them fired for expressing a forbidden opinion, I have to ask what’s their beef with Joe McCarthy?”

He had an (R) after his name, of course.

More: David Marcus: CNN’s airing of ‘Good Night, and Good Luck’ proves it has learned nothing.

After the play, there was an assemblage of journalists, speaking before journalism students about the importance of what they had just witnessed. Of course, the closest thing CNN had to a conservative was Brett Stephens, a nice guy, but widely acknowledged as the Washington Generals of conservative political punditry.

Needless to say, they congratulated themselves on being so enlightened and brave and speaking truth to power, while the handful of people watching threw up a little in their own mouths.

You almost have to admire the audacity of CNN. Just weeks after bombshell books and reporting finally confirmed the obvious about Biden’s incapacity and the liberal media’s lies, the network aired a play in which it dressed itself up as brave heroes of the newsroom. It’s amazing.

It’s also informative. This bizarre effort by CNN to paint itself in historical glory is proof positive that the network has learned nothing from its lies over the past eight years, and there is no reason to believe it will start being honest anytime soon.

Still though, I’m sure the simulcast worked wonders to recruit new leftists to the cause:

SOMEBODY’S GETTING A TIMEOUT: ABC News Suspends Terry Moran Over X Post That Called Trump Official Stephen Miller A “World-Class Hater.”

ABC News said that it has suspended senior national correspondent Terry Moran over a late night X post, since deleted, attacking Trump administration official Stephen Miller as a “world class hater.”

“ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage* and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others,” a network spokesperson said. “The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation.”

Top Trump administration officials had called out the X post on Sunday morning, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt saying that the network should hold him “accountable” and Vice President JD Vance asking for an apology.

The 12:06 a.m. post called Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, a “world class hater.”

“You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate.”

“Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred is only a means to an end, and that end is his own glorification. That’s his spiritual nourishment.”

Even though the post was already deleted, Leavitt flagged the post on Sunday morning and wrote, “This is unhinged and unacceptable. We have reached out to @ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable.”

* George Stephanopoulos could not be reached for comment.

THIS IS CNN:

Based on his take on Luigi Mangione, I assume this is Donie’s response to the L.A. riots and last weekend’s antisemitic Molotov Cocktail enthusiast:

 

OCEANIA HAS NEVER BEEN AT WAR WITH EAST TESLA: Now the Dems Want the Guy They Called a Nazi for Six Months to Come Back to Their Side.

Khanna’s case was primarily based on the idea that having Musk on their side would benefit the Democrats. He stated: “Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump’s unconstitutional administration. I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.”

Khanna also said of Musk: “We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with. A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.”

Wait a minute. The Democrats have more of the values with which Musk agrees? Really? Does that mean that the Democrats are a National Socialist party? Of course they aren’t. They’re an international socialist party, and it’s grimly ironic that they’re now hoping to win the allegiance of a guy they’ve been smearing as a National Socialist for the last six months.

Is Ro Khanna unaware of the words of his California colleague, Rep. Robert Garcia, who back in Jan. 2025 denounced Musk for making what he claimed was a “Nazi salute,” and adding: “He didn’t just do it one time—he did it twice for emphasis. If you talk to anyone like historians, folks actually study the Nazis and study this actual kind of disgusting display, they’ve been very clear about what that was. He should not just apologize. He should be condemned for those kinds of actions. So gross.”

Then there was America’s sweetheart, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-You Wanna Open a Tab?) declared: “In this country, we fight Nazis. We don’t celebrate them.This is the United States of America. And I don’t care what Elon Musk is doing behind a presidential seal. In this country, we hate Nazis. Kind of like a foundational, defining thing. Two of probably the most foundational, defining things about American history is that we beat the Confederates and we beat the Nazis. And I don’t know what side people may be on today, but I still am not rocking with anyone sympathetic to Nazis.”

Wow, wait until 2025 AOC discovers what she and her Green Nude Eel architect were saying and doing in 2019!

And as I wrote yesterday, it took Dick Cheney and George W. Bush almost 20 years to lose their Nazi-branding among the left. It only took took Elon 24 hours.

Flashback: “The greatest cultural victory of the Left has been to disregard the Nazi-Soviet Pact” and toss it down the Memory Hole.

THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE ISSUE IS ALWAYS THE REVOLUTION: New: Violent Rioters in Paramount, CA Create Havoc, Pelt Fed. Law Enforcement Vehicles With Rocks.

Looks like the chaos is continuing in Los Angeles.

Protesters tried to block ICE vans on Friday with one person finding out it wasn’t a good idea, when he appeared to fall in front of a van. Then the protesters went to the federal detention facility, got violent, and caused chaos there as they damaged property and threw things at law enforcement officials. The California SEIU President David Huerta was among the people detained, and the U.S. Attorney later said he was arrested for allegedly interfering with officers.

Homeland Security said that they were surrounded by 1,000 people, and it took over two hours for the LAPD to arrive despite being called “multiple times.”

The rioters also defaced the building with graffiti, including anarchist symbols, “Kill ICE,” “Dead cops,” and anti-Elon Musk statements.

And displayed plenty of Mexican and at least one Palestinian flag:

 

Flashback: Welcome to protest season, where the cause changes but the tactics stay the same.

QED:

UPDATE (FROM GLENN):

ANOTHER UPDATE (FROM GLENN):

RICO prosecutions, asset seizures, give them the full J6 treatment and more.

But wait, there’s more:

And once Trump activates the Insurrection Act, he can recognize a new California Legislature, which can then vote to split the state into 5 red states and one blue state. A majority of Congress can approve it and it’s done. Okay, probably not going to happen, but this is the can of worms the left risks opening.

It’s been done before.

NEWSOM 2028 CAMPAIGN KICKING OFF NICELY:

 

WAIT, I THOUGHT THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE WAS JUST PARANOID FICTION:

Read the whole thing.

UPDATE: To be fair, the destruction of L.A. is very a group project: Attempted Obstruction of L.A. ICE Raid by SEIU President Makes Him New Poster Child for ‘Resist Trump.’

And:

MORE:

KURT SCHLICHTER: Patriots Are the Losers in the Trump v. Musk Feud.

My parents were Scottish and German, so they didn’t actually yell at each other. I can only imagine that this is how little kids with Latin parents feel like when Mami and Papi are fighting. People fight and then they make up. Now, some people are speculating that this is a giant put-on designed to blow people’s minds, and if I hadn’t been alive for the last decade of insanity, I would write that off completely. It’s possible this is some sort of 4D chess match between grandmasters that is beyond my capacity to comprehend. More likely, Elon is just really, really angry. And  when somebody swings at Trump, he swings back

But it’s time to stop swinging. We need both of these guys on our team. We need Donald Trump on his A game, and we need Elon doing what Elon does. Elon’s at terrific personal risk here if this relationship goes completely off the rails. He’s got zero friends on the left. They are out for his blood. They will literally take everything he owns and throw him in jail – if not try to murder him – should the Republicans lose power. How do I know? Because we saw what they did to Donald Trump when he was on a temporary power hiatus.

But Republicans still love Elon Musk, and the Republican Party needs guys like Elon Musk, not just for his money but for his brains. There’s no going to the left for him. There’s no sitting out politics. He got in the game and now there’s no escape. Elon Musk needs the Republican Party because the Democrat Party wants him in a cell or a hole. The Republican Party needs Elon Musk because he’s Elon Musk.

Additional thoughts from Joel Kotkin: Musk’s outbursts reveal a deeper rift in MAGA: Trump is squandering the chance to build a coherent populist programme.

SIMON BILES AND RILEY GAINES DUKE IT OUT OVER TRANS ATHLETES:

Okay, buckle up folks, because something truly bizarre happened this week that you probably didn’t see coming. We’re talking about Olympic golden girl Simone Biles suddenly deciding to take a bizarre, unprovoked swipe at none other than Riley Gaines, the fearless advocate for saving women’s sports. I mean, seriously? Simone Biles attacks Riley Gaines? Didn’t have that on my bingo card.

Most of you know Riley Gaines. She’s the former NCAA swimmer who experienced the absurdity of competing against a biological male, Will “Lia” Thomas, firsthand. Since then, she’s become a national voice, tirelessly fighting to protect female athletes and the integrity of women’s sports. She’s been instrumental in getting legislation passed, and even President Trump signed an Executive Order on this issue back in February.

The whole dust-up started on X after Gaines reacted to a tweet from the Minnesota State High School League congratulating the Champlin Park Rebels for winning the state championships. Comments were disabled on the post because this is the team that cheated its way to victory by having a male pitcher.

Read the whole thing to see Biles sadly towing the establishment left’s party line:

THIS INTERVIEW WITH THE SHOWRUNNER FOR ANDOR IS PRETTY INTERESTING:

The show is more political than anything Star Wars had done before. The villains are all participants in a dictatorship and the heroes are all independent people who become victims of that dictatorship in various ways. There weren’t a lot of 4th wall breaking clunkers of the kind you see in most politically minded shows these days. They aren’t beating you over the head with the message.

And yet, as I was watching it I kept having the same thought: This is a show about China that thinks it’s a show about America.

So I was interested to read this interview with showrunner Tony Gilroy because NY Times columnist Ross Douthat isn’t shy about a) saying he loved the show and b) framing it as a left-wing show. What’s interesting is that Gilroy seems genuinely not to like this framing, as if admitting his own politics would be a failure of some kind.

In a portion of the interview that John Sexton doesn’t quote at Hot Air, Gilroy rather simplifies the history of Hollywood:

Gilroy: I mean, the bar is higher. Seriously, man. This is a trickier conversation than most of the ones I have to have on this. I listened to the podcast that you did with the — I don’t know the gentleman’s name. The one who’s trying to revive the vibe shift into the ——

Douthat: Jonathan Keeperman.

Gilroy: Right wing. Yeah.

Douthat: Right-wing publisher. Yep.

Gilroy: You could say: Why has Hollywood for the last 100 years been progressive or been liberal? I think it’s much larger. I’ll go further and say: Why does almost all literature, why does almost all art that involves humans trend progressive?

Let’s stick with Hollywood. Making a living as an actor or as a writer or a director — without the higher degree of empathy that you have, the more aware you are of behavior and all kinds of behavior, the better you’re going to be at your job. We feed our families by being in an empathy business. It’s just baked in. You’re trying to pretend to be other people. The whole job is to pretend to be other, and what is it like to look from this? People may be less successful over time at portraying Nazis as humans, and that may be good writing or bad writing, and there may be people that have an ax to grind. But in general, empathy is how I feed my family. And the more finely tuned that is, the better I am at my job.

For the last 50 years, Hollywood has been “Progressive or liberal.” But prior to that, as Neil Gabler wrote in his 1988 book, An Empire of Their Own, the moguls who founded the industry were quite conservative, in their politics, their worldview, and in the product they released. Did the best of their movies have less “empathy” than today’s product? It wasn’t until 1960s as they aged and lost control over the institutions they founded, and the mostly leftist “Easy Riders-Raging Bulls” crowd of New Hollywood took over. In a 2009 interview with the late Andrew Breitbart, Peter Robinson asked, “How did Hollywood go from Republican David Selznick, who produced Gone with the Wind to liberal David Geffin. What happened?”

Andrew Breitbart: Well two things, the studio system ended and now the celebrities are in charge.

Peter: The studio system ended, what bearing did that have on the politics?

Andrew: Well, there were people, actors have always been held in low regard by society and the businessmen who ran the studios cleaned up after their messes around town. I mean that is sort of the LA Confidential movie, you know. That changed in the 1960s to a great extent, but I would attribute a majority of this to the cultural revolution in the late 1960s and at the end part of John Wayne’s career, he no longer had the swagger. He was 60 something years old, the movie were no longer original. They were doing the same hackneyed thing over and over and over and simultaneously you know, there is a youth revolution going on in the country. And while the left was never able to take over the White House while George McGovern was not able to be victorious, Hollywood was taken over by the left and they have never relinquished it. And in fact I would argue that the right has abrogated its place in Hollywood because they were told that you are not wanted here anymore and they never fought for it. So, I don’t know who I have more contempt for, the left for its totalitarian behavior of those that disagree with them or the right the conservative movement just for allowing it to happen and not to fight back.

In his new book, Suddenly Something Clicked: The Languages of Film Editing and Sound Design, Walter Murch, Francis Ford Coppola’s longtime editor and sound designer, recalls running into George Lucas in New York shortly after Star Wars debuted in 1977, and Lucas was stunned by the massive runaway hit he had created:

I reminded him of his pre-Star Wars attempts to get Apocalypse Now off the ground, and that what interested him about that story was that it grappled with the success of the ‘rebel’ Vietnamese against the overwhelming might of the American military empire.

George: ‘Star Wars is Apocalypse Now in a galaxy long ago and far away.”

Me: Ironic that millions of Americans are now cheering for the Rebels to defeat the overwhelming might of the Empire?

It’s difficult to picture old Hollywood greenlighting Apocalypse Now, and it was only by burying that same theme that Lucas was able to get funding for Star Wars.

John Sexton concludes that “At the end of the day, Andor was made for a mostly American audience by Hollywood progressives who think it’s a show about the American right wing in some sense. That’s how I see it, but of course your mileage may vary.”

But then, that was the theme of the original Star Wars, and Lucas began writing the first drafts of his script a half century ago. Maybe it’s time for the “progressives” of Hollywood to find some new ideas about the country they inhabit.

GRETA THUNBERG AND THE GAZA CLOWN SHOW:

Her Asperger’s diagnosis became mythologized, seen as a superpower, a divine lens through which she perceived what the rest of us supposedly could not. Her social awkwardness was cast as purity. From the start, she was denied the ordinary messiness of youth. No room for uncertainty, no space to stumble, no chance to figure things out without the world watching. There were no years of trial and error, only slogans, superficiality, and scripts. She wasn’t raised. She was constructed. Greta became a pawn in adult ambitions before she ever had the chance to be a teenager. And now, she’s trapped, not just publicly, but developmentally. There’s no path out of the role she was assigned. She can’t evolve, can’t step back, and can’t show doubt, because doubt would crack the mythology. Growth would threaten the brand. Every appearance must top the last. Every stance must be louder, starker, more “historic”. Climate, capitalism, Gaza, colonialism — every issue fashioned into an end-times narrative. The machine she rides runs on moral absolutism, and if she slows down, it leaves her behind. Her parents should be ashamed — not just for allowing it, but for facilitating it. They didn’t protect her from the spotlight; they handed her to it.

And the worst part? She’s not even the main beneficiary. The NGOs, the think tanks, the activist collectives — they are. They need their martyr. They need their icon. Because an adult saying these things would be just another angry activist. But a child, frozen in time, still radiating that wounded urgency from 2018 sells.

But she’s not a child. In 2023, before she settled into her new role as an antisemite, Ezra Levant wrote, “Greta Thunberg, you know the name. She’s a young lady, a girl, really. And she is the face of the climate movement. Except the thing is, she’s not actually that young anymore. I mean, listen, I wish I was just 20 like she is, but she is 20. That’s not a teenager anymore. It’s certainly not a girl. Although meeting her in person today reminded me of how physically small she is. And I don’t know if it’s a medical condition or just a particularly unique look, but she truly looks like someone who is 12 or 13.”

She’s now 22. Since yesterday was the anniversary was D-Day, it’s worth mentioning who else was that age: “The average age of a soldier landing on Normandy was just 22.”

They were most definitely men. And despite that moon face, Greta no longer gets to play the permanent child victim role anymore.