NO ENEMIES TO THE LEFT: Dems Get Crazier, NYT Coverage Stays the Same.

Most normal Americans would agree: This year’s Democratic candidates are noticeably stranger and more radical than they’ve been in past elections. The New York Times, on the other hand, doesn’t seem to have noticed.

For whatever reason—blind partisanship, most likely—the Times’s coverage of these uniquely nutty and terrorist-adjacent cranks has been as flattering and credulous as ever. Scandals are downplayed or ignored, sketchy associations shrugged off. The past comments most Americans would consider genuinely insane are dismissed as old news. Business as usual.

No, her moment hasn’t come. Nixon is an anti-Israel socialist running in Florida. The Times fawned over her “high-volume tactics” and suggested she “doesn’t fit the mold” of other socialist candidates. As evidence, the paper cited her ownership of Cafe Resistance, a left-wing bookstore and coffee shop that glorifies convicted cop-killers. The Times didn’t mention that last part. Nor did it scrutinize her refusal to pay her fair share in taxes.

Much more at the link.

Also, I apologize for the mistake in the Insta-headline. There’s nobody to the left of the NYT.