Archive for 2020

AN ARGUMENT FOR LOCALISM: Disaster in New York does not require the same policy everywhere.

New York State has a whopping 810 cases per million residents, closing in on both Italy and Switzerland fast. And the vast majority of those cases are concentrated in the City and nearby commuter counties. Franklin County, in the Adirondacks (and where your Editor has been known to spend some time) has not yet had a single confirmed case.

By contrast, the other 49 states combined, including such hot zones as Washington and California, are at 54 cases per million residents. That puts the per million infection rate in the “other 49” just between Australia and North Macedonia. Or China, if you care to believe Commie numbers. Which we don’t.

One question, of course, is whether the rest of the country is just “behind” New York by a few days, or whether there are important differences that should inform policy. We suspect some of both is true. Yes, New York is the land of stainless steel subway poles, where the virus once deposited will linger a particularly long time, cheek-by-jowl restaurant tables, and terribly crowded sidewalks. But New York is also testing heaving masses of people, so it may be revealing its own infections more completely than other states that will soon catch up in the world’s most dubious league table.

Regardless, the vast difference in the apparent rate of infection between downstate New York and the rest of the country (and the considerable differences among the remaining 49 states) suggests that we need not apply precisely the same policies in every jurisdiction. Even in New York State, we do not understand the logic, beyond mere political calculus, for imposing the same burdens on the already poor towns of the Adirondacks as are the bare minimum, if that, in the boroughs.

Read the whole thing.

MAYBE I’LL SWITCH TO GIN AND TONIC, JUST TO BE SAFE: Can Schweppes inhibit Coronavirus infection? I doubt there’s enough quinine in tonic water to do much, but it’s no sacrifice, as I like gin and tonics anyway.

OPEN THREAD: Party with your peers.

SUDDENLY, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS MOVING VERY FAST. I WAS JUST BLOGGING ABOUT THIS THE OTHER DAY, AND NOW: Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications by Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus. Including this on the exact item I was blogging about: “Will not criticize institutions for prudent loan modifications and will not direct supervised institutions to automatically categorize COVID-19-related loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs).”

UPDATE: From the comments: “It’s pretty amazing how quickly these issues are being addressed. If the Executive can fix it, it gets fixed. If industry can help, the right person gets a call. If Congress is required…well, Nancy and Chuck are still weighing the optics of saving Americans vs cooperating with OrangeManBad.”

THE CURRENT ERA, IN A NUTSHELL:

LIONEL SHRIVER: Why Hachette were wrong to drop Woody Allen’s memoir.

Second, procedural precedent. Contracts mean nothing. Publishing is now a bottom-up, populist industry in which an army of 12-year-old editorial assistants enjoy a veto over the catalog. They may jettison at will any author deemed to be a Bad Person, evidence to the contrary be damned. So the fate of my work rests with the wokies fresh from Ivy League re-education camp who post my proofs. I’ll have to start emailing: ‘Dear Biffy: I realize your favorite book is still The Gruffalo, but could you please check that nothing in the attached first draft offends you or your little friends? Meanwhile, I promise never, ever to wear a sombrero! And I apologize to the sisterhood for marrying a man seven years my senior. The marriage is obviously an abuse of power, and he’s been grooming me for 20 years.’

The employees who walked out of Hachette should all have been sacked. Plenty of surplus arts grads could fill those open-plan desks, and they’d get the message about who’s in charge. Instead the tweenies are emboldened. Good luck to management taking that authority back.

Yet another reminder that as Ray Bradbury predicted in Fahrenheit 451, that books will be burned to protect everyone’s feelings as much as to block the content within them.