AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH: TV film on migrant Muslims’ hate of Europe’s Jews axed. “European broadcasters have been accused of censorship after refusing to air a documentary highlighting anti-semitism in Muslim migrant communities. The film, Chosen and Excluded — The Hate for Jews in Europe, depicts the plight of Jewish people suffering violence at the hands of their Muslim neighbours in cities such as Paris.”
Archive for 2017
June 11, 2017
AT AMAZON, save big on Refrigerators.
TEACH WOMEN NOT TO RAPE! (CONT’D): Ex-prof convicted of assaulting disabled man gets new trial. “A New Jersey appeals court has overturned the conviction of a former Rutgers University professor who was found guilty of sexually assaulting a disabled man she said consented to the relationship by communicating on a keyboard.”
21st CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS: Is a Vasectomy Now the Only Way Men Can Be Truly Safe from Financial Extortion?
EVERGREEN STATE AND THE BATTLE FOR MODERNITY: “Currently, news reports indicate that vigilante groups are roaming the campus with bats, seeking out Weinstein supporters (for what reason, you can use your imagination).” They told me if Donald Trump were elected, fascist mobs would seek out Jews and their supporters. And they were right!
AS ONE OF MY (LEFTY) COLLEAGUES SAYS, A UNIVERSITY SHOULD BE A BUNCH OF INDIVIDUALS TRYING TO EXCEL, NOT A “COMMUNITY” GUIDED BY ADMINISTRATORS. The False Promise of Community on Campus.
LAYERS AND LAYERS OF FACT-CHECKERS AND EDITORS:
Correction: June 10, 2017
An article on Tuesday about plans by the Trump Organization to create a new three-star hotel chain with a patriotic flair, known as American Idea, that would echo President Trump’s pledge to put America first misstated the year of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States. They occurred in 2001, not 2011.
—The New York Times. (Link safe; goes to Power Line.)
Related: CNN’s Brian Stelter Bemoans ‘Inherent Distrust’ The Public Has With Media.
VIOLENT PORTLAND: “In recent decades, Portland, Oregon, has acquired a reputation as one of America’s most tolerant and liberal cities. In practice, this means there are taxpayer-funded sex changes for municipal employees and lots of bike lanes, but comparatively little tolerant liberalism. The city government has made it quite clear that if you have views it finds offensive, it does not want you expressing them publicly. On June 4, a political rally that was described by turns as pro-Trump, alt-right, and pro-free-speech was held on federal property in downtown Portland. It almost didn’t happen for two unsettling reasons.”
WALL STREET JOURNAL: Why Trump Wins: Will Robert Mueller investigate intelligence agencies for playing in domestic politics?
The FBI, CIA and NSA are eager to pose as scrupulous, disinterested arbiters of Russian meddling. They are not eager to be seen as victims and patsies of Russian meddling. To use Mr. Comey’s phrase, the performance of our national intelligence directorate is the one rock that hasn’t been turned over.
So here’s a question for Special Counsel Robert Mueller, a former FBI chief himself. Will he accept the current framing that his Russia investigation is about everything except whether his former agency was semi-wittingly duped into some of its interventions by Kremlin danglings—there’s nothing to see here, move along.
Or will he have the courage to ask the requisite questions the FBI, CIA and NSA don’t want asked about their own, perhaps, gullibility and overeagerness to play in domestic politics because of their dislike of Mr. Trump?
Washington’s desire to get to the bottom of Russian meddling is probably less than you imagine. If not, the places to start are the Trump dossier and the role of Russian disinformation in promoting Mr. Comey’s intervention in the Hillary Clinton email matter.
I don’t think Mueller can be objective here. He should resign — or be replaced by someone without his conflicts of interest.
THE WAY THE COMEY HEARING SHOULD HAVE GONE DOWN, DAY ONE:
Mr. Comey, to be blunt, sir, your well-established pattern of public virtue-signaling even as you refuse to answer questions from both Senate and House committees about your own behavior and the behavior of the FBI, has caused us to reconsider our normal procedures. By refusing to be responsive to the American people’s elected representatives, your actions have made you appear more interested in promoting your own self-interest and/or a political agenda than in seeking justice. As a result, we will dispense of your opening statement―which was already publicly issued ahead of this hearing―and instead move on to a series of questions in seven broad categories for you to answer about the FBI’s role in this investigation and your participation in it.
Read the whole thing.
ONE OF MY FRIENDS HERE IN KNOXVILLE HAS USED CHRISTIAN HEALTH MINISTRIES FOR YEARS AND IS VERY HAPPY WITH HIS EXPERIENCE: How Over A Million Christians Have Opted Out Of Health Insurance.
WHOLE LOTTA SWAMP NEEDS TO BE DRAINED. Andrew Klavan on Corruption and Collusion: Obama, Comey, and the Press.
A BILLION HERE AND A BILLION THERE, AND PRETTY SOON YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT REAL MONEY. Roger Simon: Government Owes Taxpayers Billions for Wasted Russia Investigation.
NEWS YOU CAN USE: How to Diagnose (and Fix) Your Body’s Imbalances. I did something like this several years ago with a trainer, and it genuinely helped. I’m not sure how far you could get on your own.
AT AMAZON, 50% off or More on Comforters.
PAUL MIRENGOFF: Comey’s Calculations.
“James Comey is a ‘leaker’ — but that doesn’t make him a criminal.” That’s the headline of a Washington Post story by Matt Zapotosky.
The Post’s story tries to create the impression that, in fact, Comey is not a criminal. But Zapatosky undertakes no analysis of the law. Instead, he cites “legal analysts.”
However, none of the analysts in question addresses the question of whether Comey committed a crime.
Nice to have the press spinning for you like that.
THOUGHTS ON self-defense and proxemics.
BECAUSE THEY’RE LEFTY TOOLS, AND FEMINISM IS JUST LEFTY AGITPROP? Why don’t feminists celebrate the successes of right-wing female politicians?