Archive for 2025

GREAT MOMENTS IN COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: Roger Kimball: Why the Left Wants the Right to ‘Lower the Temperature.’

In the aftermath of the brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk last week, does the Right need to “lower the temperature” of its rhetoric? That’s what the usual suspects on the Left are saying.

As it happens, “lowering the temperature” while simultaneously raising the intelligence of discussion was one of Charlie Kirk’s specialties. A theme of his campus “American Comeback” tour (which his widow Erika plans to continue) was dignified debate. “Prove Me Wrong” was Charlie’s mantra. He eagerly engaged with college students who disagreed—or, sometimes, merely thought they disagreed—with him about a wide range of political, social, moral, and religious issues.

If you have never seen him debate, I recommend you consult Mr. Google or one of his professional counterparts and watch Charlie in action. He was robust but also unfailingly kind, patient, and attentive to his interlocutors. The reason? He wished to persuade his audience about the rightness of his point of view, about the virtues of America, the wisdom of Christianity, and the leadership of Donald Trump. Charlie was fundamentally a teacher.

How about his opponents? The internet is full of revelatory compilations of left-wingers denouncing their opponents as “fascists,” “Nazis,” and so on.

One series (and here is another) includes CNN’s Anderson Cooper asking Kamala Harris whether she thinks Donald Trump is “a fascist.” “Yes, I do” was her answer.

If we as a nation need to “lower the temperature,” then the left should be thrilled that conservatives are pointing out those went on a virtual wilding spree immediately after Kirk was murdered, but curiously, they’re having the exact opposite response:

Related: A leftist angered to the point of vandalism over the text on a sign.

A CRMININAL LAWYER FRIEND WRITES:

There are very “normal” defense lawyers talking shit about Kirk. I simply unfriended this lawyer in Nashville who thinks people give two fucks what he has to say about the world. Lefties are not only glad Kirk is dead but they’re apoplectic that so many on our side are deeply saddened by his death and moved by the tributes. Fuck that. Fuck then. Wanna vote in your stupid shit? You get to keep trying. But were you can suck a fuck if you are so small you want to tell me who I can mourn.

They’re pushing the middle right farther to the right and they think that by being ghouls and shouting at us, we’ll be like oh yeah Marxism is great and fuck that guy who bled out on live stream. Well fuck them and their small lives.

She’s right.

A MALE SPACE: The New Politics of Sex: A Conversation with Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Lamprey Milt:

UNITING THE KINGDOM:

SETH BARRETT TILLMAN: On Reconciliation. “It is said that at the negotiations at Appomattox Courthouse Lee and Grant were both frank and civil during the course of discussing the surrender of Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. Afterwards, Grant sent food to Lee to feed his (and, then, their) nation’s former enemy soldiers. Celebrations for Grant’s soldiers came only later not while Lee’s soldiers remained present. Again, in ending active hostilities, the first step towards national reconciliation was frank and civil discourse. I do not think our present and future is or will be as difficult as was Grant and Lee’s. But we too have to think about national reconciliation.”

I WAS JUST GOING TO POST A LINK TO THE BOOK, BUT A FAN INSISTS I POST A LINK TO THE SONG:  Skip Hayden’s No Man’s Land.

Yes, I was doing cute youtube videos, and actually have one for this one, but…. the problem is that the program is changing the aspect ratio and all the advice to fix it online is um…. weird, as I don’t have those controls. I’ll probably ask the help of a higher auth– the geek who shares my home. But he’s been busy. Meanwhile the youtube channel is frantically giving me suggestions for videos, including “Skip Hayden’s sports commentary.”  For those not aware, this is the character of the book No Man’s Land, and the idea of his doing sports commentary boggles the mind. (Maybe hunting documentaries? I’m not up to making those videos, mind.)  Anyway, my book No Man’s Land is out, if so inclined, give it a try. (Well, the first volume is out. I know some number of you will wait for the last, since it’s a book in three parts, only divided because it’s massive. It’s space opera on the scale of Tolkien. I question my subconscious, I do.) But the others are ready, just being processed. Second is done, third should be in my inbox tomorrow all copyedited. And buying now would goose the algorithm.)

NICK FREITAS: My Response To The Left (Video).

JONATHAN TURLEY: ‘Prove me wrong’ — Charlie Kirk and the age of rage.

Charlie was brave, and he was brash. He refused to yield to the threats while encouraging others to speak out on our campuses.

He was particularly hated for holding a mirror to the face of higher education, exposing the hate and hypocrisy on our campuses. For decades, faculty have purged their ranks of conservatives and libertarians. Faced with the intolerance of most schools, polls show that a large percentage of students hide their values to avoid retaliation from faculty or their fellow students.Charlie chose to change all that. TPUSA challenges people to engage and debate them. The response from some on the left has been to trash their tables and threaten the students. Recently, at UC Davis, police stood by and watched as a TPUSA tent was torn apart. . . .

Charlie was hated because he exposed the left’s intolerance of opposing views … all in the purported cause of achieving greater tolerance. By challenging others to debate, he triggered a generation of speech-phobics who are more interested in silencing others than speaking on their own account.

Charlie was hated for stripping away the pretense and self-delusion of those canceling, blacklisting, and attacking others for holding opposing views. He did so by standing in harm’s way.

The conservatives that Kirk coaxed out of the shadows can honor his memory by showing that they will not be silenced. They can step forward and renew his same challenge: “Prove me wrong.”

Yes.