Archive for 2025

YES, I’VE BEEN PLAYING WITH THE BOTS AGAIN. I HAVE NO IDEA WHY THIS SINGER CAME OUT LOOKING LIKE CHARLIE MARTIN!  Skip Hayden’s No Man’s Land.

But I’m cool with it.

FA’D, FO’D.

ANALYSIS: TRUE.

OPEN THREAD: Let not your hearts be troubled.

THE 21st CENTURY IS NOT TURNING OUT AS I HAD HOPED: In love with a Luigi Mangione chatbot.

In this short clip, an unnamed woman proudly declares both her infatuation with – and ability to create an artificial construction of – Luigi Mangione outside of a Manhattan courthouse, where he has recently been absolved of various terrorism-related charges. Wearing an “I ♡ Italian Boys” T-shirt with an illustration of his face, the woman lists the many reasons why an AI chatbot, presumably trained on Luigi Mangione-related trivia, offers her the perfect romantic companionship. She gets to talk to him every day, she says, as a best friend and partner with whom she can plan a future and name their children. And, the woman adds, although she is aware that this might make her something of an imposter, the fact that Luigi studied AI at Stanford meant that this was an all-round reasonable thing to do.

It’s easy to write off this case as simply a harmless, albeit quite eccentric, example of the many ways in which young people are using AI today. But to do so would be to miss something much more provocative about how society has changed in the past decade. It’s the future of romance, she added in her clip. But it’s not. It’s the future of everything.

Something she notes in her monologue is that her Mangione AI-bot “fights her battles for her.” This seemingly innocuous statement is particularly interesting if you remember that a low locus of control – the term psychologists refer to when discussing whether people feel in control of their own lives or not – correlates quite strongly with support for political violence today.

I’m pretty sure that The Matrix and Her were intended to be viewed as warnings, not how-to guides for life in the 21st century.

UPDATE (FROM GLENN): More fodder for my “seductive AI” book.

THE NEW RULES ARE BITING HARD:

Previously:

AT LEAST IT’S NOT BOEING THIS TIME: Apparent engine problem delays Cygnus’ arrival with ISS, says NASA. “NASA said in a blog post that a new arrival date and time was under review after the Cygnus XL’s main engine “stopped earlier than planned” early Tuesday during two burns designed to raise the orbit of the craft for rendezvous with the ISS.”

CHEAT AND RETREAT: ABC news star makes groveling APOLOGY after gushing over Charlie Kirk assassin’s ‘very touching’ texts to his trans lover.

UPDATE: Gutman’s Dog Day Afternoon rerun yesterday is how the vegan sausage gets made by the DNC-MSM:

As is this: MSNBC’s Brandy Zadrozny: In Death, Charlie Kirk Became the Main Character in a Conspiracy Theory.

DAVID DESROSIERS: Prove Charlie Right.

A young man, who was being groomed to be a moral monster by our culture and the passions it unleashes, heard the dog whistle call to arms, seized the opportunity of a public event in his home state, and did what was collectively seen by his ilk as necessary and proper.

To do so, he suspended morality, the rule of law, and human decency in order to serve what he and too many others see as a higher political purpose. Sadly, this moral madness is what is taught in our nation’s colleges. This is the ethic that guided the global left – paired now with America’s identitarian vanguard –to fundamentally remake America.

Their immoral reasoning not only led to the killing of Charlie Kirk, but it is also the rationale of messianic monsters through the ages. In the 20th century alone, under the guise of National Socialism and global communism, it led to the murder of a hundred million souls. Social media has given it another Great Leap Forward. It is the justification for the show trials, the guillotine, the oven, the suicide vest, and the lone sniper.

DesRosiers writes, “What does Charlie Kirk’s assassination portend for our country? I see the potential of a natural turning point towards the good, the restoration of the First Amendment’s spirit, and a return of political, civic, cultural, religious, and economic toleration. That would be a big rainbow following a storm.”

I hope he’s right, because the American left have arrived at a very dark place: When Charlie Kirk Died, So Did the Democratic Party. What’s Coming Next Is Even Worse.

NOT LIBERAL, NOT PROGRESSIVE: Meet the Illiberal Left.

I asked my AI assistant to argue that celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination was somehow liberal or progressive. And it told me it couldn’t. Not really.

Oh, it could parrot slogans: “speech is violence,” “silencing hate is progress,” “free speech isn’t free from consequences.” But it couldn’t make a coherent case within the older framework of liberalism, usually referred to today as classical liberalism — the one that prized free speech, debate, and persuasion. Because there is no argument in that framework that justifies shooting a man for talking.

That realization hit me like a hammer.

It’s not just that the left leans differently on facts or values. It’s that we no longer share the same definitions of words. “Liberal,” “progressive,” “justice,” “violence,” “safety,” “democracy” — these words have been redefined until left and right mean opposite things when using them.

  • Violence used to mean fists, knives, bullets. Now, on the left, it means words.
  • Safety used to mean freedom from physical harm. Now it means freedom from disagreement.
  • Justice used to mean fairness. Now it means equity — enforced sameness of outcomes.
  • Liberal used to mean defending speech, even speech you despised. Now it means silencing “dangerous” speech.
  • Progressive used to mean reform. Now it means control in the name of inclusion.We literally are no longer speaking the same language.

    This is why Charlie Kirk’s words were intolerable. He didn’t threaten anyone’s life. He threatened the redefined reality that today’s leftists live in. By speaking clearly and persuasively, by listening and debating, he proved that disagreement was still possible. And that was enough to make him a villain in the new vocabulary of “progress.”

    That’s why his death was mocked, his vigils defaced, and grief for him romanticized away by the media. Because in their framework, silencing him was liberalism. Celebrating him would have shattered their narrative. And seeing us mourn him and lionize him as a martyr is intolerable to the intolerant.

As Melissa Chen tweets, “By refusing to debate, it helped to enthrone their ideological superiority.”

UPDATE:

OBAMA OPENS UP ON KIRK ASSASSINATION, SCOLDS TRUMP FOR ‘EXTREME’ RHETORIC:

Former President Barack Obama addressed the assassination of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk on Tuesday, calling the killing a “tragedy” that poses a “threat to all of us” before scolding President Trump for contributing to a dangerous political climate.

Speaking with journalist Steve Scully at the Jefferson Educational Society in Pennsylvania, Obama cast Kirk’s assassination as part of an escalating trend of political violence.

“Regardless of where you are on the political spectrum, what happened to Charlie Kirk was horrific and a tragedy,” Obama said. “And when it happens to some but even if you think they’re, quote, unquote, ‘on the other side of the argument,’ that’s a threat to all of us. And we have to be clear and forthright in condemning them.”

The former president also took it as an opportunity to criticize President Donald Trump and his administration’s handling of the aftermath of the assassination.

“When I hear not just our current president, but his aides, who have a history of calling political opponents ‘vermin’, enemies who need to be ‘targeted,’ that speaks to a broader problem that we have right now and something that we’re going to have to grapple with, all of us,” Obama said. “But I will say that those extreme views were not in my White House. I wasn’t embracing them. I wasn’t empowering them. I wasn’t putting the weight of the United States government behind extremist views.”

Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Al Sharpton, Eric Holder, and Joe Biden could not be reached for comment. Not to mention Barry himself: