Archive for 2022

DISPATCHES FROM WEIMAR AMERICA: USA Today Tries to Destigmatize Pedophilia, Fails Miserably. “The article quoted no psychologist or forensic researcher with a different viewpoint on pedophilia – those who might rather characterize it as a severe mental disorder rather than a sexual orientation. It only gives a passing mention that the well-being and protection of children should be society’s top priority when it comes to handling such disorders. Instead, the article keeps asserting the need for treatment, allowing pedophiles to live openly without fear of social ostracization, not accounting for the risks involved. USA Today took a beating on social media for the article and subsequently deleted a tweet defending its controversial position…The New York Times, Vice, Salon, and many other outlets have also attempted to destigmatize pedophilia in one way or another.”

Related: ‘Did the Lincoln Project write this?’ USA Today wants you to know that ackshually, ‘there’s a lot we’re misunderstanding’ about pedophilia.

UPDATE: Stacy McCain asks, “‘What would I do with a 7-horsepower wood chipper?’ Trust me, it could come in handy, and I think you might soon decide you need one.”

(Updated and bumped.)

MAKE AMERICA 2016 AGAIN! Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump 2024 — yep, life has become a horror movie.

In the wake of her loss, Clinton asked us to feel sorry for her — rather than the other way around.

Here was a candidate handed the nomination by her party, which flushed out her most serious primary contender, Bernie Sanders, behind the scenes.

If she couldn’t beat a former reality star with that assist — plus the $150 million war chest, the backing of Beyoncé and Bruce and Oprah, the media industrial complex not just firmly behind her but rabidly anti-Trump — what makes anyone, anywhere, convinced she could pull it off in 2024? Trump’s run is a given. So is Hillary’s inevitable loss.

The good news? As we’re learning, even the most stubborn mutations weaken over time.

But perhaps, not fast enough:

FAUCI’S IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION TO THE BIDEN 2020 CAMPAIGN: “A close call:” Office of Special Counsel cleared Fauci of violating Hatch Act just days before 2020 election.

Trump, as you remember, notably preferred to try to speak with a more optimistic tone when he spoke about progress being made in battling the pandemic. He likely did that to try to reassure Americans that everyone was doing all they could and that it was a top priority. He was concerned about the collapse of the economy and the high unemployment rate due to business closings. Fauci claimed that Biden took the pandemic more seriously, which is odd, given that by then Trump had successfully used Operation Warp Speed to develop several COVID-19 vaccines and bring them to market for distribution. Fauci thought that Trump was focusing too much on the vaccination and treatment aspect of the virus.

The piece in WaPo was happy to run with the conflict expressed by Fauci. It borders on an in-kind donation to the Biden campaign. The piece pointed to Trump’s campaign rallies and the fact that he didn’t mask-up as Biden and Kamala did at the time.

From yesterday: Unity! Sen. Rand Paul is pleased to announce that ‘Dr. Fauci and I finally agreed on something in our Senate hearing today:’

 

 

THIS WHITE HOUSE HAS HARDLY BEEN A LEADER IN THAT UP TO NOW: White House task force aims to promote scientific integrity. “The task force, part of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy, makes no mention of COVID-19 but maintaining the public’s trust in scientific-based information about coronavirus, for example, has been a challenge since President Joe Biden’s administration took office a year ago.”

WHEN SCIENTISTS DON’T “FOLLOW THE SCIENCE:” Why did scientists suppress the lab-leak theory? In private, they said it was plausible. In public, they called it a conspiracy theory.

We were assured by leading scientists in China, the US and the UK that this really was a coincidence, even when the nine closest relatives of the new virus turned up in the freezer of the laboratory in question, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Now we know what those leading scientists really thought. Emails exchanged between them after a conference call on 1 February 2020, and only now forced into the public domain by Republicans in the US Congress, show that they not only thought the virus might have leaked from a lab, but they also went much further in private. They thought the genome sequence of the new virus showed a strong likelihood of having been deliberately manipulated or accidentally mutated in the lab. Yet later they drafted an article for a scientific journal arguing that the suggestion not just of a manipulated virus, but even of an accidental spill, could be confidently dismissed and was a crackpot conspiracy theory. . . .

Two years later, no such natural furin-cleavage-site insertion has yet turned up in the many wild SARS-like viruses found since then. But what has turned up is a grant proposal put to the US’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2018 to fund experiments that would deliberately insert novel furin cleavage sites into novel SARS-like coronaviruses to help them grow in the lab. And who was party to that proposal? Why, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Indeed, it had already done a similar experiment with the spike protein of a MERS-like virus a few years before. It’s not quite a smoking gun, because the proposal was turned down, but it’s an open secret in science that you sometimes put things into grant proposals that you have already started doing, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences was funding most of the work in the Wuhan Institute of Virology anyway.

The emails unveiled this week reveal no good scientific reason at all for why these leading virologists changed their minds and became deniers rather than believers in even the remote possibility of a lab leak, all in just a few days in February 2020. No new data, no new arguments. But they do very clearly reveal a blatant political reason for the volte-face. Speculating about a lab leak, said Ron Fouchier, a Dutch researcher, might ‘do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular’. Francis Collins was pithier, worrying about ‘doing great potential harm to science and international harmony’. Contradicting Donald Trump, protecting science’s reputation at all costs and keeping in with those who dole out large grants are pretty strong incentives to change one’s mind.

In short, the fatcats lied to cover their asses.

I DID THAT: Reader Randall DeGeorge sends this: “This is from the Giant supermarket near my house in Fredericksburg, VA, yesterday. I actually went to 3 different Giants looking for a particular item my wife likes, but took pictures only in this one. The pictures are fairly representative of all the stores I hit. To be fair, not all of the shelves were like this; most of the shelves with canned goods and staples were pretty well stocked. Fresh food, though, including the meat section, was scarce. I’m fortunate enough to live within a 15 minute drive of at least 6 different supermarkets, so I can find what I need most of the time. But I don’t recall ever seeing stuff like this. Interesting times.”

Yeah, the shortages are spotty and uneven but they are increasingly widespread.

Then there are the prices. Another reader sends this:

THE INTELLECTUALS IN CHARGE: Navigating the fixations of the overthinking class. “One professor there, an eminent authority in what is probably my major interest — south Texas and Mexican-Americans — told me outright that he wouldn’t take on a Republican student. (This is, at it happens, illegal — set aside immoral — but how would I prove it happened?) . . . What I am gathering is that the history department at Major State U is extremely politicized, and dominated by neurotics.”

Plus: “The question is why. Why has the whole of society adopted the aesthetic and proclivities of the history department at Major State U, obsessed and obsessive to the point that those failing to obsess themselves are cast out? It’s a strange eruption of the style and mindset of what used to be an inconsequentially small cohort of Americans, now gripping the whole of society. . . . In fixation, in anxiety, in mania for control, in encompassing neuroses, the past is present again. The intellectuals are in charge. We allow them, we emulate them, and we suffer for it.”

Bullying and media power. Related: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing? Some academics argue that unhappy elites lead to political instability.

Ten years ago Peter Turchin, a scientist at the University of Connecticut, made a startling prediction in Nature. “The next decade is likely to be a period of growing instability in the United States and western Europe,” he asserted, pointing in part to the “overproduction of young graduates with advanced degrees”. The subsequent surge in populism in Europe, the unexpected votes in 2016 for Brexit and then for President Donald Trump in America, and a wave of protests from the gilets jaunes to Black Lives Matter, has made Mr Turchin something of a celebrity in certain circles, and has piqued economists’ interest in the discipline of “cliodynamics”, which uses maths to model historical change. Mr Turchin’s emphasis on the “overproduction of elites” raises uncomfortable questions, but also offers useful policy lessons.

Related: To quote Neal Stephenson, from In The Beginning Was The Command Line, “During this century, intellectualism failed, and everyone knows it. In places like Russia and Germany, the common people agreed to loosen their grip on traditional folkways, mores, and religion, and let the intellectuals run with the ball, and they screwed everything up and turned the century into an abbatoir. Those wordy intellectuals used to be merely tedious; now they seem kind of dangerous as well. We Americans are the only ones who didn’t get creamed at some point during all of this. We are free and prosperous because we have inherited political and values systems fabricated by a particular set of eighteenth-century intellectuals who happened to get it right. But we have lost touch with those intellectuals.”

That was last century. This century the intellectuals are trying to bring to America what they did to Europe in the 20th.

BLUE STATE BLUES: Even Mark Zuckerberg is leaving California for Texas. “Months of speculation have come to an end as California-based Meta Platforms Inc. — the parent company of Facebook — recently leased the entire commercial half of Sixth and Guadalupe, the 66-story high-rise under construction downtown that will be Austin’s tallest building when finished. The social media company has also pledged hundreds more jobs in the Texas capital.”

Presumably related: How High Will California’s Taxes Go Before There’s No One Left To Tax?

UPDATE (FROM GLENN): This is why I’m supporting the Fresh Start States “Welcome Wagon” Initiative.

WHERE IS SCOTUS? Supreme Court Does Joe Biden’s Dirty Work by Delaying Ruling on Vaccine Mandate. “It appears that Biden has succeeded in running out the clock. The Supreme Court could have ruled that the lower courts’ stays on the mandate should continue, and yet here we are three days after the rules went into effect and justices remain silent, leaving employers with only two choices: comply with the mandate or defy OSHA, which wields enormous power and hovers like the sword of Damocles over their businesses.”

EVERYTHING IS GOING SWIMMINGLY:

To be fair, this is only because he’s a terrible, awful president.

WHO YOU GONNA BELIEVE — BIDEN OR YOUR OWN LYIN’ EYES? Empty Shelves Disprove Biden’s Supply-Chain Boasts. “I guarantee you that when this newsletter is shared on Twitter, some ninny will respond that he just went to Safeway or Trader Joe’s or Whole Foods and didn’t see any shortages — as if the complaint about the supply chain was a contention that every shelf on every store in every community was bare. No, the problem is that an unpredictable mix of goods are suddenly unavailable, with little sense of when new shipments will arrive. Sometimes this problem has minor consequences — getting straight fries instead of curly fries — and sometimes there are huge consequences, such as oncologists who are struggling to get more medications and other medical supplies.”

BYRON YORK: GOP pushes back on Dem ‘big lie.’ “Doomsday for democracy if the filibuster were eliminated! Now, of course, Schumer believes the precise opposite of what he said back then. Given his statements and actions, it is no exaggeration to say that Schumer’s hypocrisy, when it comes to the legislative filibuster, is simply off the scale. (McConnell’s is not; when then-President Donald Trump urged majority Republican senators to get rid of the legislative filibuster, McConnell said no.) Why is this fight happening now? Democrats appear to be deeply frustrated by their inability to pass their current top priorities — the far-reaching voting bills, plus yet another huge spending bill — with their 50-vote non-majority in the Senate. Their ambitions have outstripped their power in the Senate for the last year. Now the approach of midterm elections makes it even more difficult to get what they want done. So they are lashing out at Republicans and seeking to change the rules. Look for more, not less, of that as the elections grow nearer.”

FROM THE NEW DEAN OF THE U.C. IRVINE NURSING SCHOOL:

The earth is sick with an illness that arises from how we who inhabit the Global North live. The effects of this illness largely fall upon Black, Indigenous, and People of Color here but more so in the Global South. Newer technologies may contribute to the solution to climate change, but they will not treat the underlying illness. The treatment is to change how we live and work. Let us, here at the school and within UCI Health, follow through on the COP26 commitment to developing climate-resilient and low-carbon health systems. Let us, as a nursing community, give Earth the same succor it gives us day in and day out.

I’d rather nurses focused on saving patients than on “saving” the planet, personally.

UPDATE: From the comments: “Oh great, a nurse that considers YOU the disease.”

COLORADO: Minority leader confident GOP will fare well in 2022; statehouse majority ‘100 percent possible.’

If mainstream media outlets and political pundits are to be believed, the new redistricting for the Colorado House of Representatives has solidified the Democrats’ strong-hold on that chamber of the legislature.

However, if you talk to at least one man — who spends most his time studying the data and putting together a Republican election plan for 2022 — he’ll tell you different.

“I hope every Democrat reads that and believes it,” said House Minority Leader Hugh McKean, who represents House District 51, when asked what he thinks of all the hype around the new House districts map that was approved by the Colorado Supreme Court late last year.

McKean, sat down with Compete Colorado for an exclusive look at why the House map may not signal a continuing Democrat majority. Although McKean wouldn’t give away specifics, saying it’s part of a strategy, he outlined the Republican path to victory though the eyes of the man responsible for growing the numbers.

McKean has followed the redistricting extensively throughout the process, adding that he’s been over the data so many times there really is no other answer that he can see.

I hope he isn’t getting cocky.