MATT MARGOLIS: Five Fake Stories Social Media Didn’t Suppress or Censor.
Archive for 2020
October 16, 2020
WHY TRUMP WILL WIN AGAIN: Pay particular attention to the reference by David Catron of the American Spectator to the 20 percent of registered voters who admit avoiding pollsters. And that’s just those who admit it.
GAS VS. ELECTRIC: Tale of Two Turbos: 911 Turbo S vs. Taycan Turbo S.
BRADY WHITE: Cop Confessions 2: ‘There is a mass exodus in law enforcement, nationwide.’ “‘Brady White’ is the pseudonym of an active-duty police officer. His first column — or rant, as he prefers to call it — came to me from a trusted source. Brady’s original ‘confession’ struck a chord with PJ Media readers, particularly those in law enforcement, and it is with great pleasure that I’m able to publish his second column.”
IT’S AN ANDREW BREITBART-APPROVED SLOW REVEAL: 1-On-1 With Rudy Giuliani — What Haven’t We Seen From The Hunter Biden Hard Drive, And Why Won’t He Release It In Full?
THE BAD ORANGE MAN MADE ME DO IT: Steve Scully Appears To Blame Trump For His Actions That Led To His Suspension.
Flashback: New Status Anxiety Fuels Trump Derangement.
AMELIA HAMILTON’S GROWING PATRIOTS PODCASTS: Episode 33: The Early Battles (NY and NJ) of the Revolutionary War.
My younger son really enjoys these, and has even appeared on one or two.
BUT IT’S A GOOD START: It Will Take More Than Antitrust Enforcement To Light Innovation’s Fire. But the lame lefty nostrums presented here won’t do anything.
BYRON YORK: On Hunter Biden, Remember The Real Story.
he last sentence is what matters. With it, the Biden campaign seemed to be flatly denying that Hunter Biden introduced Pozharskyi to Joe Biden. Of course, one could parse the meaning. For example, the statement referred only to Biden’s “official schedules.” There could not have been some sort of unofficial introduction, could there? And the statement said that no meeting “as alleged by the New York Post” ever took place. There could not have been some sort of introduction that did not fit the allegation in the New York Post, could there? Certainly the Biden campaign would not make a lawyerly, evasive statement like that, would it?
The answer is not clear. Especially after Politico reported: “Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule. But they said any encounter would have been cursory. Pozharskyi did not respond to a request for comment.”
Oh. That reporting, if accurate, made the situation a bit murkier. Perhaps there had been an “informal” interaction between the elder Biden and Pozharskyi, but it would just have been “cursory.” In other words, the New York Post article, banned by social media, denounced by many journalists, might be accurate.
I’d be shocked if it weren’t. Look how scared all the Democrat satraps are.
CHANGE: FCC chairman says he’ll seek to regulate social media under Trump’s executive order. “Social media companies have a First Amendment right to free speech. But they do not have a First Amendment right to a special immunity denied to other media outlets, such as newspapers and broadcasters.”
PUNCH BACK TWICE AS HARD: Orthodox Jewish Rabbis Sue Cuomo for ‘Blatantly Anti-Semitic’ COVID Order.
KIDS, DON’T TRY THIS AT HOME: Penis Bones Could Be Scooping Out The Sperm of Competitors in Some Animals.
ANNALS OF LEFTIST AUTOPHAGY: Left Targets Dianne Feinstein For Not Attacking Amy Coney Barrett Hard Enough.
CHILDREN OF THE NOMENKLATURA: Hunter Biden demanded Chinese billionaire pay $10 million for ‘introductions alone,’ emails show. “Hunter Biden hooked up with the billionaire, Ye Jianming, chairman of the CEFC China Energy Co. conglomerate, during his father’s vice presidency.”
DEMS WANT CITIZENS UNITED REPEALED, BUT WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT THIS: RNC files FEC complaint against Twitter, claims company made ‘illegal in-kind contribution’ to Biden campaign. “The RNC claims that by limiting circulation of the New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s business dealings, and Joe Biden’s alleged knowledge of those dealings, they violated federal campaign finance law.”
A friend texts: “What’s that thing about punching back? It’ll be increasingly hard for the msm to suppress this, but I have full confidence they’ll do their best.”
Related: Howie Carr: It’s a crime you haven’t heard about Hunter Biden’s latest.
I didn’t think the Democrats were planning to dismantle the First Amendment and end free speech until after they won the election next month.
But their plans have changed, obviously.
Which means that this treasure trove of Hunter Biden emails (leavened with some amateur porn and photos of Hunter passed out next to his crack pipe) must really be a “bombshell.”
How big is this scandal if Big Tech has to try to shut down all transmission of the damning stories about the favored candidate of both Silicon Valley and Communist China (but I repeat myself)?
It’s so criminal that they’re doing their damnedest to make sure that America’s low-info, COVID-panicked voters will never even hear about it, and will never realize just how corrupt Dementia Joe and his family are.
Ouch. Related: Richard Fernandez:
MORE: The Media Does Not Want You To Read, Share, or Discuss The New York Post‘s Hunter Biden Scoop.
CHRISTIAN TOTO REVEALS the Secret Behind TV Shows, Movies Promoting Open Border Policies. “The industry once again invites outside groups to manipulate stories, themes.”
SOCIAL MEDIA DOESN’T POLICE THIS, JUST PRO-TRUMP STUFF: CBD users tout benefits on social media amid lack of scientific evidence.
MODIFIED LIMITED HANGOUT CONCLUDED: “The same week Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett was scolded by liberals for using the term ‘sexual preference,’ Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said during an ABC town hall Thursday that being transgender is a choice.”
BOTTOM STORY OF THE DAY: Greta Thunberg mocks Barrett for not having ‘views on climate change.’
MARK JUDGE: A Radical Left Without the Radicalism. “The Trial of the Chicago 7, Sorkin’s preachy and all-over-the-place new film (screening in certain theaters and arriving on Netflix today), largely fails because it avoids a direct accounting for the motivation of its characters. For to do so would be to uncover some very uncomfortable truths about the American left, radicalism, and the 1960s—truths that Sorkin, who both wrote and directed the film, would rather not face. The most obvious is that many of the activists from that tumultuous and overly exposed era were Marxists and radicals out to destroy the United States.”
It’s not so much that he doesn’t want to face that, as that he doesn’t want Americans to know that.