Archive for 2020

WHEN YOU GIVE IN TO THE RED GUARDS, IT’S NOT A PRETTY PICTURE:

None of this, of course, will make our institutions any better, happier, or more welcoming. But it’s not meant to. It’s about power.

WHY IS THE FAR LEFT SUCH A CESSPIT OF ISLAMOPHOBIA? MSNBC’s Joy Reid flips an old attack on its head and compares Islamic extremists to Trump supporters.

The cable news host and conspiracy theory enthusiast remarked this week, amid a larger discussion on President Trump and radicalization, that leaders in “the Muslim world” often “encourage their supporters” to commit acts of violence against their enemies.

“When leaders, let’s say in the Muslim world, talk a lot of violent talk and encourage their supporters to be willing to commit violence, including on their own bodies, in order to win against whoever they decide is the enemy,” Reid said Monday evening, “we in the U.S. media describe that as, ‘They are radicalizing those people,’ particularly when they’re radicalizing young people.”

She added, “That’s how we talk about the way Muslims act. When you see what Donald Trump is doing, is that any different from what we describe as radicalizing people?”

This is weirdly reminiscent of when Reid promoted what she called a “salient” blog post in 2006 that stated: “My feeling is that the only reason that a world war between civilizations has not already broken out is that the vast majority of Muslims living in the world today are so desperately poor that they have the time, energy and resources for only the occasional burst of AK-47 fire into the air from the garbage and sewage laden streets outside of their mud huts.”

The post added, “Give them resources and I fear that they will come after us everywhere that they can find us, which is to say everywhere.”

Reid’s comments yesterday brought a stern rebuke from fellow leftists Rowaida Abdelaziz of the HuffPo, Sana Saeed of Al Jazeera+, as well as: Comrade Ilhan Omar [Who] Wants An Apology From Joy Reid of Democrat Party Press Office — MSNBC Branch.

THE LATEST STRATEGYPAGE STRATEGYTALK PODCAST: “Will China Trigger A War?” Link goes to youtube. MP3 download here. If you like the podcast, please consider subscribing.

RELATED ARTICLE: Scaring Chinese spies.

RELATED COLUMN: A few selected China War scenarios, including China versus China.

RELATED BOOK REVIEW: A review of the book Chinese Communist Espionage.

DEEP CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND: OK, not so deep. From May 2019, an analysis of Chinese spies targeting the MD Anderson cancer center and other research facilities in Houston’s Texas Medical center.

Beijing’s operational objective: By targeting MD Anderson and its affiliates in the Texas Medical Center, China’s communist elites seek to steal the creative genius, decades of training and years of cancer research of some of the world’s finest specialists and most brilliant doctors.

Beijing covets their knowledge because, when applied, it has great economic and political value. For example, China could produce and sell high-value, high-prestige pharmaceuticals, and improve its own medical programs, without spending a yuan on research.

Decouple? Absolutely. But also penalize and, when required, retaliate.

RULES FOR THEE, BUT NOT ARCH GRAND DUCHESS PELOSI VON BLOW WASH:

Even as Nancy Pelosi blocked aid to the small businesses suffering under destructive shutdowns she was treating herself to a blow out at an upscale salon in Pacific Heights, San Francisco — the most expensive neighborhood in the nation, in which Pelosi owns a $2.3 million estate.

Pelosi had repeatedly pushed localities to keep businesses closed so as to combat what she calls the “Trump virus.” Her salon treatment was still illegal under local bans on indoor salon activity.

Fox News received the tip when the livid owner of the salon, Erica Kious, saw the security footage of a blatantly unmasked Pelosi sauntering around the premises as a client of an independent stylist using her salon’s amenities not under the purview of the still-closed salon.

From the Washington Examiner. Read the whole thing and know this tawdry but typical example of leftist elitist hypocrisy speaks unfiltered volumes to cosmetologists, barbers and their customers.

UPDATE: Powerline examines the Arch Grand Duchess’ wash and blow.

FOR THE FOOTNOTE CROWD: The Fox News report that broke yesterday. It’s appeared on Instapundit several times and may ultimately rate as a Classic Reference.

GEORGE BARTLE: Beijing’s Strategic Ends: Harmony Through Hierarchy and the End of Choice.

Returning U.S. analytical models to a historically grounded understanding of China’s goals and methods refocuses efforts along a path that accepts China as being Chinese, not something that can be molded into a Western partner or that can be fully understood through Western political science theories. According to the neo-liberal and neo-realist theoretic perspectives guiding U.S. foreign policy, Chinese paradigms of empire, tribute, and vassalage had been relegated to the past, and therefore could be sublimated through a rules-based order governed by U.S.-created and led multilateral institutions. However, neo-liberal ideology failed to grasp that while the People’s Republic of China is a modern nation-state, it also maintains attributes of an ancient empire. This is not to say that China wants to abolish the current system or upend a rules-based order. Rather, Beijing seeks to bend global rules so they conform to its own worldview in an effort to define and direct international behavior, norms, and rituals.

Ultimately, a Stalinist-infused neo-tributary approach to international relations, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, seeks an end state where smaller countries are locked into a hierarchical relationship with Beijing—managed not just through hard power, but also deference and ritual—where freedom of choice and the ability to pivot between great powers give way to Beijing’s preferences. While Chinese academics have yet to coalesce around a single Sino-centric theory of international relations, one way of conceptualizing how Beijing achieves its strategic ends was articulated in a 2015 article by Su-Yan Pan and Joe Tin-Yao Lo, two scholars from the Hong Kong Institute of Education, who argued that China’s foreign policy is best understood through a neo-tributary framework that takes into account four core imperial concepts that continue to shape the Chinese Communist Party’s worldview.

Millions for defense, not one cent for tribute.

IN THIS TARGET RICH ENVIRONMENT, THE BEE BRANCHES OUT:  Video: Americans march through American streets chanting “Death to America!”

In a sane world, that would be satire. Alas. This is not a sane world.  As for Not-the-bee: strength to your typing fingers, my friends.  I look forward to the day when the Babylon Bee People take over all news reporting in America. After all, they’re the most reliable reporters we have.