JOURNALISM: Journalism school dean: The First Amendment ends at insulting Mohammed. If you want to create an incentive system where newspaper editors get lynched for insulting Jesus, this is the way to go about it.
Archive for 2015
January 22, 2015
GOP ISSUES DIRECTORS SHOULD LISTEN TO HER: Ashe Schow: Advice on women’s issues for 2016 GOP presidential hopefuls.
REMEMBER WHEN MONEY IN POLITICS WAS BAD? ME NEITHER: The Hill: Hillary Clinton plans to astound, intimidate with fundraising ‘like nothing you’ve seen.’
Major donors are ready to announce huge financial commitments to Hillary Clinton as soon as she announces a second run for the White House, according to Clinton allies and Democratic fundraisers.
The Clinton team wants to build excitement about her campaign launch, which is expected in March or April. The money blitz would be a show of Clinton’s strength meant to scare away potential primary rivals.
“The floodgates are going to open immediately, and there’s going to be a rush to get on the team,” said Don Peebles, the real estate mogul who served on President Obama’s national finance committee. “There’s nobody in the Democratic Party who can match her. Not even close.”
“It’s going to be like nothing you’ve seen,” added one top Democratic donor, who supported both of Obama’s presidential campaigns and plans to throw big support behind Clinton. “The numbers will be astounding.”
Clinton is also busy considering who to have run the finances of her would-be campaign.
Well, I guess Terry Bean is out of the question.
Related: The Hill: Hillary Does Best Putin Imitation. “We have a process, yes.”
CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS: Sexual Assault Myths, Part 1.
HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE, LEGAL EDUCATION EDITION: Are You Paying Too Much for Law School? Not if you’re attending the University of Tennessee College of Law, which is on the list of 20 Best-Value Law Schools.
STOP THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICIANS’ WAR ON MEN: Man found not responsible for rape blasts Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand for ‘harassment campaign.’
Paul Nungesser was found “not responsible” for sexually assaulting another student at Columbia University. The student who accused him, Emma Sulkowicz, has since began carrying a mattress around the university as part of an art project to protest a finding she claims was unfair.
Sulkowicz’s activism earned her an invitation to President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night from Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. When Nungesser heard of the invitation, he blasted the senator for rewarding Sulkowicz’s attacks against him.
“I am shocked to learn that Sen. Gillibrand is actively supporting Ms. Sulkowicz’s defamation campaign against me by providing her with a public forum in which to broadcast her grave allegation,” Nungesser told New York Magazine on Tuesday. “By doing so, Sen. Gillibrand is participating in a harassment campaign against someone, who, for good reason, has been found innocent by all investigating bodies.”
Nungesser reminded people that the university, after a seven-month long investigation, found him not responsible in 2013 — even in the current atmosphere where colleges are encouraged to find students guilty to appease political interests. Nungesser also pointed out that he cooperated with police after Sulkowicz filed a report (after the university found him not responsible) and that prosecutors declined to pursue the case.
Kirsten Gillibrand should be ashamed, but she’s not capable of shame, and probably doesn’t really think that men are people, or have feelings that matter, anyway.
January 21, 2015
KEVIN WILLIAMSON: The Abolition Of Private Life. “The profoundly stupid ‘black brunch’ protests, during which racial-grievance entrepreneurs disrupted meals at places that seemed to them offensively Caucasian (‘white spaces’) are a different species of undertaking. . . . The message these protests send is that there is no private space — and, therefore, no private life — so far as this particular rabble is concerned. It’s the familiar Trotsky conundrum: You may not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in you.”
Keep it up, folks. You’ll have the Upper West Side voting for Ted Cruz.
ED DRISCOLL: MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, Man of a 1000 Faces. “The resemblance is quite remarkable.”
AT AMAZON, deals galore on Outdoor Gear and Clothing.
JIM TREACHER: Can You Guess What Happened At This Concert For Non-Violence? “I don’t see any white dudes stomping that guy, so it must not be the sort of violence that matters. You will now erase this incident from your memory.”
YEAH, WELL, I’M TIRED OF SUPPRESSING MYSELF TO GET ALONG WITH STUPID PEOPLE: I’m tired of suppressing myself to get along with white people.
AN INTERESTING BLOG: Jane The Actuary.
SAYUNCLE: Why are anti-gun activists so violent? “The incident where the man lawfully carrying a gun was tackled by another man was captured on video. Did you see that? A law-abiding black man minding his own business when suddenly an obviously racist white guy batters him. I wonder when Al Sharpton will organize a march to protest this injustice!”
UPDATE: From the comments:
So let me see if I understand this correctly: in a former Confederate state, a white man attacked an elderly black man for exercising a legal right, and the Democrats are upset that the white man is being prosecuted?
The more things change, the more things stay the same.
Heh.
ANDREW KLAVAN AND BILL WHITTLE: The Nazis Were Socialists, Not Right-Wingers.
WHEN CONTROL IS LARGELY AN ILLUSION: Random Chance’s Role in Cancer.
Unlike Ebola, flu or polio, cancer is a disease that arises from within — a consequence of the mutations that inevitably occur when one of our 50 trillion cells divides and copies its DNA.
Some of these genetic misprints are caused by outside agents, chemical or biological, especially in parts of the body — the skin, the lungs and the digestive tract — most exposed to the ravages of the world. But millions every second occur purely by chance — random, spontaneous glitches that may be the most pervasive carcinogen of all.
It’s a truth that grates against our deepest nature. That was clear earlier this month when a paper in Science on the prominent role of “bad luck” and cancer caused an outbreak of despair, outrage and, ultimately, disbelief.
The most intemperate of this backlash — mini-screeds on Twitter and hit-and-run comments on the web — suggested that the authors, Cristian Tomasetti and Bert Vogelstein of Johns Hopkins University, must be apologists for chemical companies or the processed food industry. In fact, their study was underwritten by nonprofit cancer foundations and grants from the National Institutes of Health. In some people’s minds, those were just part of the plot.
What psychologists call apophenia — the human tendency to see connections and patterns that are not really there — gives rise to conspiracy theories. It is also at work, though usually in a milder form, in our perceptions about cancer and our revulsion to randomness.
This is also seized on by hustlers and politicians looking for an excuse to regulate.