Archive for 2014

THIS, FROM A SCOTT WALKER HATER: “If unions want to reclaim their relevance, it would be a good thing to ban use of the word ‘solidarity’ as well as anything that rhymes with ‘hey, ho’ forever more.”

THE WEALTH TRANSFER TROJAN HORSE:  I’m talking about global warming “climate change” (a mighty convenient moniker), of course.  The White House’s newly released National Climate Assessment contains the usual Gorean “the sky is falling!” exclamations.  But as the Wall Street Journal points out,

[T]he report has the feel of that infomercial footage of the people who can’t crack an egg or perform routine household tasks until they acquire this or that as-seen-on-TV product. The cautious findings of serious empirical climate literature are so obviously exaggerated and colored that the document is best understood as a political tract with a few scientific footnotes.

For instance, the report’s “overview” summary asserts that “extreme weather events with links to climate change have become more frequent and/or intense,” climate change is already “disrupting people’s lives,” and “this evidence tells an unambiguous story.” Good thing we’ve been building that ark in the backyard.

But the fine print that few will ever read acknowledges the real uncertainties of something as complex as the planet’s atmosphere. “There has been no universal trend in the overall extent of drought across the continental U.S. since 1900,” the authors observe. We also learn that “trends in severe storms, including the intensity and frequency of tornadoes, hail, and damaging thunderstorm winds, are uncertain and are being studied intensively.” And so on.

But hey, why are those pesky conservatives so insistent on “facts, facts, facts” all the time (Benghazi, IRS, global warming climate change, etc., etc.)???  Don’t they realize that all that really matters is achieving “justice,” as defined by Democrats, and thus inevitably involves massive taxation or spending (i.e., wealth transfer)?  Geez.

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S DESERVING VICTIMS: The campus sexual-assault controversy is of liberal higher ed’s own making, Heather Mac Donald writes.

FLASHBACK:  Clinton: “Poverty” Behind Boko Haram, ‘Not Radical Islam.’

As Andrew Cline wrote at the American Spectator in 2010, “The canard that poverty causes terrorism just won’t die. It was one thing when Nation writer David Corn and others connected the two back in 2002. The liberal default position is that poverty causes crime. It was an instant knee-jerk reaction after 9/11. But by now we all ought to know better. Except, the theory is still being peddled despite the lack of evidence to support it.”

MOM DOESN’T WANT YOU TO BE THOUGHTFUL ON MOTHER’S DAY: From Virginia Postrel at Bloomberg View:

Testing that conclusion directly in another experiment, Steffel and LeBoeuf found that participants given more time and encouraged to shop “thoughtfully” did worse than those given limited time and told not to “overthink” the decision. “Givers may, paradoxically, get worse gifts the more they try to be especially thoughtful,” they write, “as their focus on giving individuated gifts may make them lose focus on getting the best-liked gifts.” (Another experiment found that givers weren’t going for variety for its own sake and only mixed up the selection when there was a difference in the movies listed by the two cousins.)

This research has the faults of most psychology experiments. It draws broad, if tentative, conclusions from a relatively small sample, only 168 participants, and it’s explicitly limited to the U.S. (The authors note that gift-giving customs could affect results elsewhere.) But it rings true. It’s hard to see the world through other people’s eyes — even when we’re buying them gifts.

Read the whole thing.

FEMINIST PORN. “If it’s possible to have sex in a feminist way, it’s possible to record it in a feminist way.” (Link is safe, by the way. It goes to BBC.com.)