Archive for 2014

COLLEGE SPEECH CODES MAKING US LOOK AWFUL ABROAD:

Do the sex code writers really expect an already consummated couple, so to speak, who met a month before in English lit class, Jamie and Sam say, to calmly discuss beforehand the nuance of whether they are going to make love, have sex, or rut like beasts of the field? Oh, how I long to know what the late George Carlin would have done with such material, unseemly by nature as it may be and as he often was (though usually for some redeeming purpose).

But the PC crowd that thinks up this stuff does not find anything about it the least bit funny. As best I can tell from a safe distance, campus Big Sister is totally humorless, thus managing the improbable feat of being unseemly, inane and tedious all at the same time.

Now what, finally at long last, has all this to do with the Middle East? The answer is “plenty”, but I will be brief.

To one extent or another, all Muslim Middle Eastern societies (to include those of North Africa, the Sahel and Southwest Asia), Arab and non-Arab alike, maintain traditional attitudes toward human sexuality and to how that subject in its various manifestations may and may not be discussed in public. I do not mean by this that these societies are free from pre- or post-modern sexual perversity; on the contrary, there is plenty of perversity and arguably no shortage of sexual neuroses as well from Morocco to Egypt to Pakistan and back again. But the public optic conveys a very different image, and toleration for what is defined as deviant behavior is low. This is not hard for Americans of a certain age to understand, for Middle Easterners’ attitudes toward homosexuality, out-of-wedlock sex, abortion and so forth are more or less indistinguishable from mainstream American attitudes a mere half century ago. Take careful note: We are the ones who have changed, and by normal social-historical criteria, the change has been blindingly rapid. . . .

The favorite rhetorical question asked here after 9/11 was “Why do they hate us?” The answer to this question is that it was and remains the wrong question. The typical tradition-minded Middle Easterner does not hate America. But rather a lot of tradition-minded Middle Easterners are disgusted by America. There is a difference.

The rise of “gay rights” discourse and especially of the gay marriage controversy to the pinnacle of American politics—all the way to the Supreme Court—befuddles and disgusts most of them. The immodesty and downright salaciousness of American “low” fashion, especially for women, repels and disgusts them, too. The manifest disrespect shown to elders and teachers alarms and disgusts them. The now deeply embedded linguistic obscenity in American culture, whether in some forms of popular music or just in overheard speech, repulses and disgusts them. And not that violence against women and homosexuals is unknown to them in their own societies—again, very much to the contrary—but the casual pervasiveness of it in Americans’ own depictions of American society shocks and disgusts them, too.

Above all, the deafeningly public character of all this—the banishment of useful hypocrisy, in other words—puzzles and disgusts to the point that many of them think we have simply gone mad. To figure out why so few Middle Easterners were won over by President Obama’s famous Cairo speech, and all the other speeches designed to project American “soft power” into the Muslim world (just check recent polling data to measure the failure), you need to understand this backdrop.

Well, to be fair, we don’t think much of Hollywood or the Social Justice Warrior class either. But for those asking “why do they hate us,” this may prove an uncomfortable answer.

SECURITY MOMS: AP-GfK Poll: Americans not confident in US government’s ability to minimize range of threats. Americans lack confidence in the government’s ability to protect their personal safety and economic security, a sign that their widespread unease about the state of the nation extends far beyond politics, according to the latest Associated Press-GfK poll.

Plus: “I think what we’ve got going on here in America is the perfect storm of not good things.”

Yeah, who could have seen this coming?

ASHE SCHOW: Attorneys send letter to senators opposing campus sexual assault bill.

A group of 20 attorneys from across the country with experience handling sexual assault cases sent a letter on Thursday to the co-sponsors of the Senate’s campus sexual assault bill.

The attorneys, who have all represented students accused of sexual assault who are now suing their universities for lack of due process, wrote that while sexual assault needs to be addressed, rights of the accused need to be preserved.

“We are concerned that the complexity of the problem and the momentum to find a solution to the manner in which colleges handle these matters will overwhelm any effort to ensure fair treatment to and protect the rights of the accused — particularly with respect to due process, impartiality and the collection of evidence,” the attorneys wrote.

They cited the Campus Accountability and Safety Act, noting the legislation uses the word “victim” or “victims” 34 times but “accused” only once.

“By presuming that all accusers are in fact ‘victims’ prior to any investigation or adjudication, the proposed legislation does a grave disservice to those accused of serious sexual offenses by ignoring a concept at the core of due process, innocent until proven guilty,” the attorneys wrote.

The attorneys remind the Senators that those accused of sexual assault “face potentially life-altering consequences from an adverse decision by their schools.” Therefore, colleges and universities have a duty to ensure that accusers and the accused are “treated fairly and equitably.”

The attorneys lay out their proposal for improving CASA, including referring alleged sexual assault cases to law enforcement, rather than simply establishing a relationship with law enforcement, as the current legislation does.

To keep colleges unbiased, the attorneys requested the senators scrap the plan to have one confidential adviser serve as the initial investigator and victim’s advocate, since that presents a conflict of interest. The attorneys also suggested having an advocate for the accused, both of which would be independent from the investigation.

Also requested was for investigators to be either professional investigators or to have law enforcement experience. These investigators would conduct an impartial inquiry “to determine whether a criminal referral is warranted” or whether the investigation should be handled by the university.

As for adjudication, the attorneys again emphasized the importance of due process rights for the accused, including the right to counsel and to cross-examine accusers.

Honestly, if Evil Conservatives wanted to bankrupt and embarrass higher education as an industry, they could hardly do better than this bill.

21ST CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS: So the bottom line of this piece seems to be that it’s okay for students to hook up with professors, so long as they’re lesbians.

DON SURBER IS NOT IMPRESSED: Every single thing this president has tried has failed.

“I am not on the ballot this fall,” President Obama told voters in Evanston, Illinois, on Thursday. “Michelle’s pretty happy about that. But make no mistake: these policies are on the ballot. Every single one of them.”

Republicans should be shaking in their boots — with laughter. His presidency is one failure after another.

Whether he’s failed depends on what you think he’s tried.

HANNAH GRAHAM’S PARENTS ARE ASKING PEOPLE TO CIRCULATE THIS, BUT JUST LOOKING AT IT MAKES ME SAD.

Screen Shot 2014-10-04 at 11.21.48 PM

47 YEARS AGO, the fastest manned aircraft flight ever. You know, a lot of things seem to have peaked in that decade.

UPDATE: From the comments: “They had fastest manned flight, we have fastest debt accumulation. We’re just good at different things, that’s all.”

JUST IN CASE YOU WEREN’T WORRIED ENOUGH ABOUT EBOLA: Official: Enterovirus 68 virus caused boy’s death. “A virus that has been causing severe respiratory illness across the country is responsible for the death of a 4-year-old boy, a state medical examiner determined. Hamilton Township health officer Jeff Plunkett said the Mercer County medical examiner’s office found the death of Eli Waller was the result of enterovirus 68. The virus has sickened more than 500 people in 43 states and Washington, D.C. — almost all of them children.”

UPDATE: More from Sharyl Attkisson.

TEACH WOMEN NOT TO RAPE! (CONT’D): 11-Year-Old Boy Impregnates Friend’s Mom. Note the way the story is written so that the 11-year-old boy seems to be the active party here: “An 11-year-old Auckland boy fathered a child after having sex with a friend’s 36-year-old mother.” Now reverse the genders and try to imagine that.

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE, LEGAL EDUCATION EDITION: Nebraska Offers Early Retirement Buyouts to 30% of Tenured Faculty. Maybe I’ll feel different when I’m older, but it would take a lot bigger buyout than that — a one-time payment of 90% of a year’s salary — to induce me to retire.

PEGGY NOONAN: The New Bureaucratic Brazenness:

We’re all used to a certain amount of doublespeak and bureaucratese in government hearings. That’s as old as forever. But in the past year of listening to testimony from government officials, there is something different about the boredom and indifference with which government testifiers skirt, dodge and withhold the truth. They don’t seem furtive or defensive; they are not in the least afraid. They speak always with a certain carefulness—they are lawyered up—but they have no evident fear of looking evasive. They really don’t care what you think of them. They’re running the show and if you don’t like it, too bad.

And all this is a new bureaucratic style on the national level. During Watergate those hauled in and grilled by Congress were nervous. In Iran-Contra, Olllie North was in turn stoic, defiant and unafraid to make an appeal to the public. But commissioners and department heads now—they really think they’re in charge. They don’t bother to fake anxiety about public opinion. They care only about personal legal exposure. They do not fear public wrath. . . . There was a persistent sense the professionals had agreed to be chary with information that might alarm America’s peasants and make them violent.

Which is precisely why we should bring back tar and feathers, given that more modern political institutions appear to have failed.