TOM BEVAN: Why Does Kathleen Sebelius Still Have A Job?

Unlike the real world, where managers and employees are judged on results and held accountable for their performance, in Washington, D.C., loyalty and partisanship almost always come first. Accountability comes later, if it comes at all.

This happens in every administration, and President Obama’s is no different, as we’ve seen with the fatal mistakes made regarding the Fast & Furious gun program and in the assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. Democrats, claiming to see these as partisan witch hunts designed to hurt the administration politically, circled the wagons. Obama stood loyally by Eric Holder and Hillary Clinton.

Loyalty is generally a good thing, in politics, as in life. But Kathleen Sebelius and her agency’s rollout of Obamacare is different.

Sebelius’ department had 3½ years to prepare to implement the Affordable Care Act. No one ever suggested that commandeering one-sixth of the American economy would be an easy task. (Many Republicans suggested the opposite and were dismissed as killjoys for their efforts.) But after the debacle of the last two weeks, liberals and Democrats—not conservatives or Republicans—should be calling for Sebelius’s head.

But they won’t.

DATING ADVICE FOR WOMEN: Waiting For Superman? Don’t Hold Your Breath. Maybe you should give the guy with the pet rabbit another chance.

TRAIN WRECK: Sebelius ObamaCare Demo Turns Into Debacle.

OBAMA FORCING CRUEL CHOICES ON MOTHERS: Video: Allentown mother forced to choose between ObamaCare and feeding family.

NEWS YOU CAN USE: Guys, A Pet Bunny Probably Won’t Improve Your Sex Life.

DIAMOND IS PRETTY COMMON, REALLY: Diamonds Stud the Atmospheres of Saturn and Jupiter: Precious gems generated by lightning storms, study says.

AT AMAZON, new Fall Toys.

Also, coupons galore in Lawn & Garden.

K-12 IMPLOSION UPDATE: Students Suspended After Posting Photo Of Vice-Principal Apparently Choking Student.

WHEN I SPOKE AT THE ISSA CONVENTION EARLIER THIS WEEK, THEY SAID THE BAD GUYS WERE BASICALLY WINNING THE SECURITY WAR: Cost of cyber crime increases 78 percent in four years.

ONLY THE MACHINES WILL CARE, BY THEN: Meet the asteroid that might hit Earth in 2880. Okay, I’ve given you the plot for your science fiction story. Now go write it.

HMM: A Smartphone Charger That Sniffs for Malware: Scanning a smartphone for malware with a charger offers more protection than security apps ever can.

AT AMAZON, 30% or more off on Satellite Radios.

Also, 25% or more off in the Fall Baby Sale. Er, actual babies not for sale. Yet.

FASTER, PLEASE: Blood vessel cells can repair, regenerate organs, scientists say.

WELL, THEY HAVE TO BE BIG TO HAVE ROOM FOR THE ALIEN SPACECRAFT AND SECRET NAZI BASES TO FIT: 820 Foot High Tunnels Discovered Under Antarctic Ice.

A LOOK AT LASER-POWERED SPACE TRAVEL. The concept’s been around for a while, of course.

SCIENCE: Novel Two-Stage Laser Fusion Approach.

CHANGE: Army funding next generation Special Ops combat armor. We’re not in Starship Troopers or John Steakley territory yet, but closer: “The suit may use liquid armor, currently under development at MIT, which has the ability to transform from a “liquid to solid in milliseconds when a magnetic field or electrical current is applied.” The goal is full-body ballistic protection, theoretically allowing the wearer to literally walk through a stream of bullets. A panel that rests against the skin would be able to detect and respond to the body’s core temperature, skin temperature, heart rate, and hydration levels. The suit would also provide basic life support such as heat, air, and oxygen. The US Special Operations Command is looking for revolutionary new gear assisting troops in exceeding human performance in combat.”

TAXPROF: The IRS Scandal, Day 155.

JAMES TARANTO: What Fresh Hell Is This? ObamaCare’s technical troubles call the mandate into question.

You know the ObamaCare debut isn’t going well when a pair of supporters, Nick Wing and Jeffrey Young of the Puffington Host, pen an article with the headline “9 Valid Concerns We Can All Have About Obamacare, Without Thinking It Will Literally Bring Hell on Earth.” Talk about damning with faint praise!

Wing and Young have set up quite a straw man, taking ObamaCare opponents’ most exaggerated fears and exaggerating them even further.

They set up a straw man on the other side of the debate as well. The article opens with the “concession” that “the Affordable Care Act isn’t perfect. . . . Like most laws, Obamacare never will be perfect.” (That “most” is a nice touch. One wonders if they have an example in mind of a law that is perfect.) But we don’t recall anyone promising that ObamaCare would be perfect. What Obama and his backers promised was that it would be very, very good–that it would provide “universal” (or nearly so) coverage while reducing costs and maintaining or improving the quality of medical care.

Now, however, Wing and Young dramatically scale back that promise, describing ObamaCare as an “ambitious reform effort meant to make a dent in the nearly 50 million Americans who currently lack health insurance.” Again, that’s a contradiction in terms: It was in fact “ambitious,” but it would not have been so if it meant only to “make a dent.”

This is all by way of setting a very low standard for evaluating ObamaCare, one that will ensure it will be judged a “success” as long as it doesn’t destroy America. But the meat of the article is actually an indictment of ObamaCare, at least if one applies a reasonable standard of asking whether on balance it is a good piece of legislation.

Yeah, by that standard it’s a miserable failure.