Archive for 2013

NEWS YOU CAN USE: How Many Times Should You Chew A Bite Of Food. “One thing to be said in favor of thorough chewing is that it slows an eater down. This is helpful if that particular eater is trying to shed some weight. By the time his brain registers that his stomach is full, the plodding 32-chews-per-bite eater will have packed in far less food than the five-chews-per-bite wolfer.”

WANT TO LIVE A LONG TIME? Pay Attention.

PUT IT IN PEOPLE, AND TURN IT ON WHENEVER THEY SEE A PICTURE OF BIG BROTHER: Tiny wireless injectable LED device shines light on mouse brain, generating reward. “Using a miniature electronic device implanted in the brain, scientists have tapped into the internal reward system of mice, prodding neurons to release dopamine, a chemical associated with pleasure.”

I predicted this in the New York Times over a decade ago: “One nanotechnology expert, Glenn H. Reynolds, a law professor at the University of Tennessee, said that someday it might even be used to make tiny robots that would lodge in people’s brains and make them truly love Big Brother.”

IF HE’S LUCKY, HE CAN KEEP THE STORY OUT OF THE NEWS UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION: McAuliffe car company sues Watchdog in libel claim. It’s not important that he win, just that he provide “mainstream” journalists an excuse for soft-pedaling it. Or am I being too cynical here?

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE: Addressing the declining productivity of higher education using cost-effectiveness analysis. “Since the early 1990s, real expenditures on higher education have grown by more than 25 percent, now amounting to 2.9 percent of US gross domestic product (GDP)—greater than the percentage of GDP spent on higher education in almost any of the other developed countries. But while the proportion of high-school graduates going on to college has risen dramatically, the percentage of entering college students finishing a bachelor’s degree has at best increased only slightly or, at worst, has declined.”

WHY CONGRESS SHOULD ADOPT MY LEGAL-PROTECTION-FOR-SAVINGS-AND-401Ks PROPOSAL. I missed this endorsement from Nick Gillespie:

I think Reynolds is on to something, though I’d be happy to see legislators of either party start talking up the sort of bill he proposes. For years now, there have been rumors that 401(k) and other supposedly sacrosanct retirement accounts will became game for governments low on funds. However well-based or not those fears are, anything the feds can do to draw clear lines and hem in their future behavior would be a good thing, for all the reasons Reynolds suggests. Massive levels of political and legislative uncertainty have reigned supreme in the 21st century and fear of the future is a great way to strangle it before it begins.

Enterprising members of Congress, take note.