Archive for 2013

“JUST A BLOGGER:” Judge rules Union County blogger is protected by the state’s shield law. “In a decision that could impact bloggers across New Jersey, a Superior Court judge ruled today that a self-declared citizen watchdog who writes stinging critiques of Union County government has the same legal protections as a professional journalist.”

MARK STEYN: “A generation on, the Thatcher era seems more and more like a magnificent but temporary interlude in a great nation’s bizarre, remorseless self-dissolution.”

What has happened to Britain is what happens when a nation falls into the hands of a ruling class that doesn’t much care for the nation it rules. Luckily, that could never happen here.

VOTING WITH THEIR FEET: As Jerry Brown Touts California In China, Its Citizens Pack Their Bags. “While Governor Jerry Brown is in China touting the state’s rebound and recovery, many Californians are busy packing their bags for a move to Texas, Nevada or Arizona. Why? Because it appears that the once-Golden State may finally be overpriced, underperforming and ungovernable.”

ROSS DOUTHAT ON THE GUNS VS. GOSNELL COVERAGE CONTRAST, AND MEDIA BIAS. “As the last example suggests, the problem here isn’t that American journalists are too quick to go on crusades. Rather, it’s that the press’s ideological blinders limit the kinds of crusades mainstream outlets are willing to entertain, and the formal commitment to neutrality encourages self-deception about what counts as crusading.”

UPDATE: Prof. Stephen Clark writes:

When I read op/ed’s like those of Douthat, I can’t help but think that modern journalism is the very antithesis of Mother Jones’ dictum that they so like to imagine themselves fulfilling: To comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Rather, they seem to aspire to that which Finley Peter Dunne, through his character Dooley, warned against – a passage from which Jones and many others have uncritically borrowed: “Th newspaper does ivrything f’r us. It runs th’ polis foorce an’ th’ banks, commands th’ milishy, controls th’ ligislachure, baptizes th’ young, marries th’ foolish, comforts th’ afflicted, afflicts th’ comfortable, buries th’ dead an’ roasts thim aftherward”.

Modern journalists are very far from being the rabble rousers and muckrakers they imagine themselves to be. They are merely courtiers to the political and cultural powers incumbent in society.

It’s not surprising that when journalism started recruiting from the apparatchik class, it became part of the apparat. Or maybe it’s the other way around. . . .

ONLINE JOURNALISM REVIEW: Journalists should wake to Obama’s free speech record.

Goodale points to the administration’s use of the 1917 Espionage Act to sedate American journalism. “The biggest challenge to the press today is the threatened prosecution of WikiLeaks, and it’s absolutely frightening,” he said. During Obama’s two terms, the Espionage Act has been used to prosecute more alleged leakers than all former presidential offices combined.

Goodale said journalists don’t seem to consider this much of a problem. “They don’t believe it,” he told CJR. “I actually have talked to two investigative reporters who are household names, and I said, ‘Do you realize what’s happening to you if this goes forward?’ And I talk, I get no response, and the subject shifts to other parts of the book. No one seems to care.”

Meanwhile, nobody believes that a YouTube video was behind Benghazi, but filmmaker Nakoula is still in jail.

TOOLS SHAPE THEIR USERS: Stone tools helped shape human hands. “Around 1.7 million years ago, our ancestors’ tools went from basic rocks banged together to chipped hand axes. The strength and dexterity needed to make and use the latter quickly shaped our hands into what they are today – judging by a fossil that belongs to the oldest known anatomically modern hand.”

HERE’S AN AURORA BOREALIS MAP. Anybody seeing anything?

UPDATE: So far, readers in the “good” zone report nothing.

UPDATE: Reader Micah Brown writes: “I’m in North Dakota right now, and I’d love to tell you about the northern lights — but I can’t, because as we speak the heavens are dumping 8-12 inches of snow on us, so I do not have a view of the sky. Here it is mid-April and spring still hasn’t arrived. If only the severe global warming which I was promised/threatened with in my youth had actually materialized, I might be outside, in a t-shirt, drinking a beer, watching the show.”

THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON E-BOOKS: When we read on dead trees, do we retain more? This wouldn’t surprise me. There’s a spatial element to reading a dead-tree book that’s absent with e-readers. I’ve noticed, in fact, that I have a strong preference for working from hardcopy when I’m doing scholarly writing.

POLITICS: Kermit Gosnell and Adam Lanza:

Jezebel points out the obvious, writing that “Gosnell doesn’t represent or stand for abortion care in any way. Abortion, done right, is a safe medical procedure.” But this idea of a high-profile case drawing an emotional response, and the attempt to use that emotional response to drive a policy debate, ought to be familiar. Jezebel’s statement, after all, could just as easily have read: “But Adam Lanza doesn’t represent or stand for gun ownership in any way. Gun ownership, done right, is a safe practice.” Jezebel notes that “fewer than 0.3% of abortion patients ever experience a complication that requires hospitalization,” according to a pro-abortion rights group. But even according to anti-gun statistics, there were only 33,000 gun-related deaths in 2011 for 300,000,000 guns owned in the country (fewer than .00012 percent). The violent crime rate in the U.S., in fact, is approaching a historical low.

The case of Dr. Kermit Gosnell, horrific on its own, is not helpful as a stand-in or argument in the wider debate about abortion and reproductive rights (because what he did is already illegal), just as the case of Adam Lanza, horrific on its own, is not helpful as a stand-in or argument in the wider debate about personal safety and gun rights (because what he did is already illegal).

Hmm. Is that the right analogy?