Archive for 2013

USA TODAY EDITORIALIZES: Simplify tax code with blank slate: Our view. “As anyone who dreads April 15 knows, the code is a farce that wastes taxpayers’ time and money, caters to the influential lobbies and corrupts Congress. In the quarter-century since the last reform, it has grown so complicated that it costs individuals and companies $160 billion each year to comply. That’s nearly double what the federal government spends annually on highways, bridges, airports and other transportation projects.”

THIS HAPPENS TO BABIES, TOO: Kitten Nearly Dies From Vegan Diet. “The horrific case at a North Melbourne animal hospital has prompted a warning about the dangers of people ‘forcing ideologies’ on their pets.”

Nature is what it is, not what you want it to be. Whether with kittens or kids.

INTERESTING: How Adding Iodine To Salt Resulted In A Decade’s Worth Of IQ Gains For The United States. “A new NBER working paper from James Feyrer, Dimitra Politi, and David N. Weil finds that the population in iodine-deficient areas saw IQs rise by a full standard deviation, which is 15 points, after iodized salt was introduced. Since one quarter of the population lived in those areas, that corresponds to a 3.5 point increase nationwide. We’ve seen IQs go up by about 3 points every decade, something called the Flynn effect, so iodization of salt may be responsible for a full decade’s worth of increasing IQ in the U.S.”

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: When Men Are The Victims. “There is great similarity between female and male victims and their abusers. The biggest difference is that male victims find themselves in the same position women were 30 years ago. Their problem is viewed as of little consequence, or they are to blame, and their are few available resources for male victims. Three-quarters of the men who contact an abuse shelter or hotline report that the agency would provide services only to women, and nearly two-thirds were treated as the abuser rather than the victim.” Yet research shows men are victims as often as women.

IN MY USA TODAY COLUMN, further thoughts on expanding the Third Amendment.

I’m thinking of writing a law review article entitled A Living Constitution For The 21st Century. We were told we had to accept increases in government power and other changes back in the 20th Century because the Constitution was a “living breathing document” that had to adapt to a changing world. That being the case, what kinds of changes might it need to undergo now? (Bumped).