Archive for 2010

MILD MEMORY LOSS is not a normal part of aging, new research finds. “According to Wilson, recognizing that the earliest changes in memory are related to Alzheimer’s pathology can lead to early diagnosis and will be critical information if a treatment is developed that can alter the pathologic course of the disease.”

I’LL BE DELIVERING THE POPE LECTURE AT CLEMSON next week, talking about “The Higher Education Bubble, And What Comes Next.”

IN THE MAIL: From Tanya Huff, The Truth of Valor.

MICHAEL CANNON: THE “U” WORD:

I grow increasingly amused at how some people carefully avoid saying that ObamaCare is unpopular. When Pollster.com aggregates all the various polls on ObamaCare’s popularity, it reveals that a plurality or majority of the public has consistently opposed the law since before the angry town-hall meetings of August 2009 . . .

It’s no surprise when HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius avoids the U-word by saying stuff like, “We have a lot of reeducation to do.” (To be clear, she’s talking about reeducating you, not herself.)

But it’s odd when a Washington Post news item describes the public as “profoundly ambivalent” toward the law.

Well, they’re both part of the Administration.

MATT WELCH TO TARP DEFENDERS: “When you assume as axiomatic both a looming ‘total financial meltdown’ and a presidential ability to ‘save the economy,’ the only drama left is the final number of digits on the blank check.”

TIM CAVANAUGH: No Sympathy for the Deadbeat: Most Americans Reject Walking Away. “Is socially acceptable mortgage default another fake trend story? We’ve heard a lot about how deadbeating has become stylish in 2010, but a substantial majority of Americans still reject the notion of walking away on a loan.”

THE HILL: Freshman Democrat blasts leadership for not holding vote on salary cut. “In a letter sent Thursday afternoon, Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick (D-Ariz.) pressured Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) to hold a vote on her bill to cut congressional pay by five percent and save taxpayers $4.7 million next year before Congress breaks for its fall recess.”

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN: IS YOUR CHILD A “PREHOMOSEXUAL?”

MEGAN MCARDLE: “This is sort of impressive: Paul Krugman simultaneously castigates Republicans for the fiscal irresponsibility of wanting to extend tax cuts for the rich that cost about $700 billion–and for irresponsibly threatening the extension of tax cuts for the middle class which cost three times as much. Yet you could read the entire column and not realize that it’s the middle class tax cuts which are the really expensive, budget-busting bit.” Or you could just . . . skip the entire column and put your time to some productive or enjoyable use.

RIGHTS AND WRONGS at the U.N.