Archive for 2009

A DOUBLE-DIGIT LOSS FOR The Washington Post? “Indeed, in this case, the Post may have done nothing but distract and befuddle their own favored candidate, who, like the Post, became obsessed with a 20-year-old college paper. He and the Post both forgot that campaigns are about voters’ current problems and hopes for the future.”

BELMONT CLUB: The Lordlings. “The one thing no generation of parents can protect their children from is reality. No inheritance can withstand the foolishness of heirs. The harsh arithmetic on the frontier, the terrible outflow of dollars and cents, the gradual and then sudden loss of credibility as people see they are dealing not with serious people but with gilded fools cumulate their irresistible effects.”

FDIC CLOSES NINE MORE BANKS. “The closings boost the number of failed U.S. banks this year to 115. The nine banks closed Friday were the most the agency has shut in one day since the financial crisis began taking down banks last year.”

Related: Fannie Mae Delinquency Rate Skyrockets.

VIDEO: Mike Flynn Talks Big Government on the Kudlow Report.

DON’T FORGET TO SET YOUR CLOCKS BACK for the end of Daylight Savings Time.

I wish it went year-round.

MAKING FRANK RICH nervous.

THE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS of smartphones.

STUFF WHITE PEOPLE don’t like.

SOME CHEESY Halloween pickup lines sorted by costume. Emphasis on the cheesy . . .

JOHN HINDERAKER: Bush-Era Leaks Were Dangerous After All. “Many commentators have noted that this is one more instance where the Obama administration, now that it is in possession of the facts and charged with responsibility for the nation’s security, has acted in full concert with much-reviled policies of the Bush administration. That’s a valid point, and Holder’s press release on the subject, which you can read here, is almost humorous in its labored attempt to create the impression that use of the state secrets privilege by the Obama administration is somehow different from the identical use of the identical privilege by the previous administration. . . . But the administration’s decision merits a closer look because of the nature of the Shubert case.”

“COME FOR THE CULTURE WAR, stay for the chicks.” “The primary reason our womenfolk are at war with the looming spectre of the nanny state is because you can’t buy Jimmy Choos in a socialist paradise.” This should provoke a reaction.