HMM: So I see this story via Drudge:
Officials with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel say they have received so many phone calls from the public that they launched an investigation into Sheriff Scott on Tuesday.
The question is – did he use his position as sheriff to influence an election? If so, he could be in violation of a federal election law called the Hatch Act.
The Lee County Sheriff’s Office receives more than $1 million in federal grant money from everything from human trafficking to bullet proof vests.
But if Sheriff Scott is found in violation of the Hatch Act, the feds can pull two years salary worth of federal funding – the equivalent to $300,000 for the Lee County Sheriff’s Office.
Another possibility is removal from office.
So if this is the case, what about those sheriffs and prosecutors in Missouri? Here are the guidelines. Wonder if they got any complaints about the Missouri “truth squad” affair? The guidelines say that covered state and local authorities may not “use official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the results of an election or nomination.”
UPDATE: Dave Hardy writes that the Hatch Act is “inapplicable to elected state officials so long as the elected post is their primary job. Since the Hatch Act also bars covered persons from RUNNING for office, it’d be pretty hard to apply it to elective posts! I wonder why the OSC even bothered opening an investigation, except to appease the people pestering it.” That’s probably it.
