Archive for 2008

TIGERHAWK: “The editors of the New York Times are beginning to worry that they are the rubes.”

THEY’RE OBSERVING INDEPENDENCE DAY at Google.

UPDATE: Also at Ask.com, and Yahoo!

KATIE GRANJU looks at the race for First Lady. “I suspect that the ‘Hillary Clinton factor’ may be at play as part of the reason folks aren’t digging Michelle Obama.”

REPUBLICANS SAY OBAMA VOTED TO RAISE TAXES 94 TIMES: FactCheck says they’ve overcounted and it’s only 54. And some of those votes are iffy. “Most of those were measures to tax the rich or corporations; many aimed to fund government programs; and most didn’t actually raise taxes in and of themselves.”

OKAY, THIS OBAMA FLIPFLOP SHIFT IN NUANCE DOESN’T DO ANYTHING FOR ME: Obama: Mental distress can’t justify late abortion: “Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama says ‘mental distress’ should not qualify as a justification for late-term abortions, a key distinction not embraced by many supporters of abortion rights.” I’m pro-choice, after all.

Boy, they’re sure pumping these things out for the Independence Day weekend, though.

UPDATE: TalkLeft: “NARAL leaders ought to feel like idiots. . . . As I’ve said all along about his religious outreach, you don’t get something for nothing and if he wants the evangelical vote, he’s going to have to offer them something. Is this it?”

MICKEY KAUS:

Instapundit does a much more effective job clearing Obama on the issue of home mortgage favoritism than Obama’s own clumsy web site. …

I do try. Especially as I ponder an Obama endorsement, in anticipation of his refined position on the war . . . .

HERE COMES THE PIVOT!

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) promised primary voters a swift withdrawal from Iraq, in clear language still on his website: “Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months.”

Not anymore. Heading into the holiday weekend, Obama and his advisers repudiated that pledge, saying he is reevaluating his plan and will incorporate advice from commanders on the ground when he visits Iraq later this month.

A top Obama adviser said he is not “wedded” to a specific timeline, and Obama said Thursday he plans to “refine” his plan.

You could see this one coming. Hmm. With all these changes, Obama’s morphing into a candidate I could support!

UPDATE: Obama denies altering proposed Iraq withdrawal timeline.

But, at ABC, Obama’s Iraq Quagmire.

And John McGinnis emails: “You can wait for the Obama Pivot. I want to watch the Olbermann Squirm!”

Olbermann will praise Obama’s “manly firmness” in deciding to keep troops in Iraq.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Ann Althouse: “This is what I was expecting. Weren’t you?”

MORE: A clarification. This should resolve all doubt.

And TigerHawk asks the eternal question.

STILL MORE: Remembering Samantha Power.

QUESTION: “Do you think that the netroots support the Democratic Party in the same way that I was a New York Mets fan, growing up? Because damned if I can see how they’re getting any practical return on their money, particularly when it comes to foreign policy.”

LONGEVITY UPDATE: SIRT-1 activators may have a downside.

MY LITTLE CTHULHU? Who says evil can’t be cuddly?

WHEN POLICE DON’T LIKE SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS:

Last year, New York police officers were seen dancing in the streets just before arresting four men in a city nightclub on charges of selling $100 worth of cocaine. It took six months and the men’s life savings, but their names were finally cleared when prosecutors took the unusual step of announcing in court that the men had committed no crime.

That’s because club surveillance video shows that the undercover cops had no contact with the accused men in the two hours they were in the club.

Now, club owner Eduardo Espinoza says the police are retaliating against him.

Jeez. They’d better get used to it — surveillance is a two-way street now, and that phenomenon is only going to increase.

ADVICE FOR OBAMA: “Obama Should Embrace His Muslim Heritage.” That hasn’t been the strategy so far. In fact, that’s the complaint: “He vociferously denies being a Muslim as if it were a slur.”

UPDATE: Bill Bradley thinks this post suggests that Obama is a Muslim. I told him that anyone who’s been paying attention — which certainly includes InstaPundit readers — knows that Obama has a Muslim heritage but isn’t a Muslim now. Indeed, that’s the point of the linked article. But the sensitivity on this question does suggest that Obama and his supporters think there’s something wrong with being a Muslim, which was also the point of the linked article.

ANOTHER UPDATE: So thinking about this, is it just out-of-bounds to use the words “Obama” and “Muslim” in the same sentence? Does that join the ever-lengthening list of things we’re not allowed to talk about?