Archive for 2008

BRING YOUR OWN CAMERA: I’ve got an oped in the New York Post on why candidates should take their own cameras to interviews. And reader John Moran emails: “I also don’t understand why politicians like Palin don’t take a pda with video of their alleged controversial comments and challenge interviewers to view and publish the actual comments when they are misrepresented. Such a tactic along with recording of the entire interview should keep the press honest.” If anything will . . . .

Here’s a description of the Simpsons episode I mention in the column. I looked for that scene on YouTube but couldn’t find it. If you have a link, please send it!

UPDATE: Illustrating my point: ABC News Edited Out Key Parts of Sarah Palin Interview.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Courtesy of reader Steve Barns, here’s the Homer interview clip.

JIM TREACHER: Hitler was a community organizer, FDR was a governor. “If they can launch their moronic memes, why shouldn’t we? We don’t have Axelrod’s astroturfing staff to spread it overnight, but I’m sure we can make do.” Actually, it took surprisingly long for this particular discussion to Godwinize. . . .

UPDATE: Reader Don Leonard emails:

Someone commented on local Cleveland radio yesterday:

Pontius Pilate was the guy that voted: “present”

Ouch.

LAWSUITS FOR FALSE ARRESTS:

Two people who were arrested by police who misidentified them as drug dealers have filed lawsuits against several East Tennessee counties, law enforcement agencies and officers. . . . Kitts, a UPS worker and youth athletics coach, is asking for up to $5 million from a slew of defendants including the Task Force’s executive director, Mack Smith; the agents who investigated the case; and the cities and counties that employed the agents.

Yates, a factory worker who ended up losing her house and filing bankruptcy after she was falsely accused twice of being a drug dealer, is asking for $10 million.

Both Kitts and Yates became law enforcement targets during secret counter-drug operations that used confidential informants in addition to police acting in undercover roles.

Sadly, this kind of mistake isn’t that unusual.

DOING THINGS I USED TO DO, THEY THINK ARE NEW: Okay, it’s not the campaign-killing disaster that some G.O.P. types hope it is, but Obama’s lame “can’t send an email” commercial, as I think about it, sums up lots of things that are wrong with the Obama campaign.

Consider: In a single not-very-compelling ad calling McCain a clueless geezer who can’t even send email, the Obama campaign managed to draw attention to his war injuries again, to show that it doesn’t even know that the 2000 McCain campaign actually pioneered the insurgent Web tactics that Obama used in the 2008 primary, and to produce an ad that seems tailor-made to alienate voters more than a few years older than Obama, all without providing any actual reason to, you know, vote for Obama. That’s a combination of cluelessness, sloppiness, and narcissism — it’s clear they can’t conceive that McCain could have pioneered anything on the Web, and they’re probably too young to actually remember the 2000 election — that seems emblematic of where that campaign has been lately. Hubris coupled with poor execution is not a recipe for success.

UPDATE: Related item here. “How toxic is Obama’s callous attack? His supporters are scrambling to Obama’s defense. Some are pathetically weak.”

ANOTHER UPDATE: Some thoughts on toxic politics from Justin Katz, including this: “Whether Obama wins or loses, the output of the American Left is likely to be intolerably toxic. Of course, if he loses, at least that toxicity won’t have a man in the White House.”

On the other hand, here’s an argument that the Obama ad was a piece of brilliant political jiu-jitsu. “Who benefits from an extended Web-wide discussion of John McCain’s physical incapacities – McCain or Obama?”

And a musician reader who requests anonymity emails:

A thought occurred to me regarding the McCain-can’t-email ad: doesn’t the Obama campaign realize that 80’s-retro fashion and music have been very trendy now for the past few years with a lot of people under 30? Those big clunky glasses McCain is wearing in that footage are back in style again among some hipsters. The ad also shows a record on a turntable, as an example of outdated technology. Surely the candidate who is going to make government cool again is aware of the resurgent vinyl craze this year? Tell me again which campaign is square and out of touch?

It’s true. The ’80s are cool again!

I’LL BE OFFLINE later today, and email, etc., will be even worse than usual. (I’ve been completely overwhelmed this past couple of weeks, and if I’ve missed your email, sorry.) But I’ve scheduled a number of posts for your delectation, most of which are non-Palin-related.

AN ARMY OF SARAHS.

MORE ON IKE, FROM BRENDAN LOY. It’s getting worse. Also, a look at its energy impact as refineries are shut down or damaged.

Plus, testing a new web-based disaster reporting system aimed at Ike. Follow the link, especially if you’re somewhere near the Texas coast. Er, unless you’re on the Texas coast, in which case you should really be leaving, like, now.

UPDATE: Watching TV a bit earlier, the Insta-Wife commented that politicians aren’t making a big deal about Ike the way they did about Gustav. That’s true.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Riding out the storm on a disabled ship. That wouldn’t be my choice, but then I’m sure it wasn’t theirs, either.

Meanwhile, lots of people refused to evacuate. Lou Minatti is worried about them. Personally, if Brendan Loy says to get out, I’d get out.

Loy himself can’t believe how many people stayed on Galveston Island: “Why the hell didn’t these people leave? I’m speaking of Galveston specifically — the other places, I understand a bit more, but 40% of people on Galveston Island refusing to evacuate?? It makes me angry. Scared for them, yes, but also, angry. Honestly.”

Meanwhile, John Little is blogging from Houston, and Dr. Melissa Clouthier is blogging from The Woodlands.

More: Hurricane Ike could be ‘catastrophe’ for Texas.

More here.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Looking on the bright side: “Firedoglake predicts Ike will be worse than Katrina. This is good news for Texas, because Firedoglake is always wrong about everything.” Let’s hope that record holds . . .

And Brendan Loy is still updating.

Also, a big roundup from Lawhawk.

And as I watch Geraldo out there in the wind, I note what one of Brendan Loy’s commenters says about people who won’t evacuate:

Part of it might be seeing Geraldo on the sea wall. Heck, if the media is going to stay, along with the firemen, why not?

I’m all for folks making up their own minds. I’d like a big concrete structure to get in though, if I decided to ride it out. And plenty of water, batteries, food…et.

But nobody likes to be shown up by some chick in a windbreaker with a microphone.

These dumb standups by the press don’t do anything useful, and they set a bad example.

Lots more at Stormpulse.com.

Texas Rainmaker: “Looks like we picked the wrong one to try and ride out.”

Plus, more from Dr. Melissa Clouthier: “I think people need to understand how profoundly the refining being down is going to affect the nation. Even if the refineries could get back going the minute the storm passes, it will take at least a week to get going again. And, it should be noted, the refineries will not get going the minute the storm passes. America needs to build more.”

And here’s John Little’s Twitter feed.

Plus the Disaster Watch Twitter feed.

MARK PENN:

I think the people themselves saw unfair media coverage of Senator Clinton. I think if you go back, the polls reflected very clearly what “Saturday Night Live” crystallized in one of their mock debates about what was happening with the press.

I think here the media is on very dangerous ground. I think that when you see them going through every single expense report that Governor Palin ever filed, if they don’t do that for all four of the candidates, they’re on very dangerous ground. I think the media so far has been the biggest loser in this race. And they continue to have growing credibility problems.

And I think that that’s a real problem growing out of this election. The media now, all of the media — not just Fox News, that was perceived as highly partisan — but all of the media is now being viewed as partisan in one way or another. And that is an unfortunate development.

CBSNews.com: So you think the media is being uniquely tough on Palin now?

Mark Penn: Well, I think that the media is doing the kinds of stories on Palin that they’re not doing on the other candidates. And that’s going to subject them to people concluding that they’re giving her a tougher time.

Because, you know, they are.

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: “The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong. . . . In doing so, he captured perfectly the establishment snobbery and intellectual condescension that has characterized the chattering classes’ reaction to the mother of five who presumes to play on their stage.”

SALON: ANDREW LEONARD ON Sarah Palin’s energy policy.

You know, I’m beginning to feel like Sarah Palin’s taken over my blog. (And I’m not the only one). I want to blog about other stuff, but she keeps popping up and taking all the oxygen away from everything else. This is certainly bad news for Obama (with me, she’s taking the oxygen away from stories about nanotechnology or asteroid mining; with Obama, she’s taking the oxygen away from him) but I’m not sure it’s good for McCain over the long term.

OKAY, I THOUGHT THE OBAMA COMMERCIAL MOCKING MCCAIN for not using a computer was dumb because it would alienate older voters. But it turns out it’s a lot dumber than that:

The reason he doesn’t send email is that he can’t use a keyboard because of the relentless beatings he received from the Viet Cong in service to our country. . . . McCain’s severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes.

Oops. Another unforced error from the Obama campaign, which seems to have had a lot of those lately. The above is from 2000 — don’t these people know how to use Google? Or NEXIS? Or something?

UPDATE: Ouch: “It’s extraordinary that someone who wants to be our president and our commander in chief knows how to send an e-mail …but not how to do a five-minute Google search.” Or even how to hire someone who can . . . .

ANOTHER UPDATE: On that note, reader Amy L. notes that Obama was recently touting his experience managing his campaign as evidence of his executive ability. That argument isn’t looking as strong after the past couple of weeks.

MORE: Epic Fail: “This whole Obama thing has *got* to be a put-on by the DNC. Any minute Allen Funt will pop out and they’ll announce the real ticket is Hillary Clinton and Phil Bredesen (or Mark Warner) or something, right?”

Okay, that’s a gross exaggeration — though I like the imagery. Is Allen Funt still around? (No, alas). But coupled with this attack, it does give the impression that the Obama campaign is floundering. I regard the Democrats’ panic here as excessive, as I noted below, but either I have a more phlegmatic disposition (possibly) or they know something I don’t know (also possible).

STILL MORE: A reader named Craig emails that this interview from the NYT says McCain uses a computer. But, to be fair, it mostly is about people showing him things on the computer:

Q: What websites if any do you look at regularly?

Mr. McCain: Brooke and Mark show me Drudge, obviously, everybody watches, for better or for worse, Drudge. Sometimes I look at Politico. Sometimes RealPolitics, sometimes.

(Mrs. McCain and Ms. Buchanan both interject: “Meagan’s blog!”)

Mr. McCain: Excuse me, Meagan’s blog. And we also look at the blogs from Michael and from you that may not be in the newspaper, that are just part of your blog.

Q: But do you go on line for yourself?

Mr. McCain: They go on for me. I am learning to get online myself, and I will have that down fairly soon, getting on myself. I don’t expect to be a great communicator, I don’t expect to set up my own blog, but I am becoming computer literate to the point where I can get the information that I need – including going to my daughter’s blog first, before anything else.

Q: Do you use a blackberry or email?

Mr. McCain: No

Mark Salter: He uses a BlackBerry, just ours.

Not enough here to call the Obama claim false. Here, by the way, is the Obama ad with its “can’t send an email” claim.

MORE STILL: On the other hand, calling McCain a Luddite shows more deficient opposition research by the Obama campaign. Reader Sandeep Dath sends this Forbes article from 2000:

This Internet-driven decentralization meant that the McCain campaign could organize down to a virtually block-by-block level for little cost. It allowed a thin organization to compete against the heavily financed and well-organized Bush machine, and it gave McCain campaign dollars an estimated 4-to-1 advantage over Bush greenbacks.

McCain himself was convinced early on that the Internet had to play a critical role in the campaign. Time and again it allowed him to leverage his money and his organization. “In the Virginia primary,” McCain told me, “we needed a lot of petitions signed to get on the ballot. We had the form available to download off the Internet and got 17,000 signatures with very little trouble.”

Ultimately, McCain realized he couldn’t go the distance, but the message was clear to any political organization with hopes for the future. His Web team had played the Internet like a Stradivari. . . .

In certain ways, McCain was a natural Web candidate. Chairman of the Senate Telecommunications Subcommittee and regarded as the U.S. Senate’s savviest technologist, McCain is an inveterate devotee of email. His nightly ritual is to read his email together with his wife, Cindy. The injuries he incurred as a Vietnam POW make it painful for McCain to type. Instead, he dictates responses that his wife types on a laptop. “She’s a whiz on the keyboard, and I’m so laborious,” McCain admits.

Yes, McCain’s 2000 campaign was famous at the time for its pioneering use of the Internet. Really, whatever Obama’s paying his people, it’s too much . . . . (Sandeep found this via Ace).

FINALLY: A reader emails: “It’s more like ‘Whatever the GOP is paying Rove, it isn’t enough…’ Because, come on, this whole Dem campaign has *got* to be a Rovian plot.” I don’t think Rove is plotting anymore. The Democrats are doing this all by themselves. . . .

And this comment has got to hurt: “I think they spent months trying to figure out how they can position Obama as better qualified than McCain, and basically came up with the fact that Obama can type.”

ChicagoBoyz: What does this blunder tell us about Obama? “Such an intelligence blunder on the part of a President could cost lives.”

Plus, a Men in Black reference.

And an important question: “Which have less dexterity: John McCain’s hands or Barack Obama’s campaign strategists?”

Reader Jennifer Verner writes: “The American people can’t help but notice a pattern here. Not only totally incompetent, but nasty and petty. And certainly not presidential.” Well, they won’t notice if the press can manage to prevent it . . . .

And a reader named Daniel emails: “I think McCain can use a keyboard to a point yet it is painful to use it. People like to point out various things about his war injuries that he seemed to have more flexibility etc. when he was younger (like him being able to move his arms higher), yet you also got to understand as someone ages those old war wounds become even more debilitating as time goes by. If someone received war injuries to the legs severely and went through therapy to walk again and go on a normal life, later in age, that person still would not be able to ride a bike or go around on their feet as quickly if they didn’t receive such wounds. Really, the ad is supposed to reflect McCain being out of touch because of his age, yet in actuality it makes fun of a partially disabled senior. Not a very good move on Obama’s part.”

Plus, “I guess now we’ll find out whether Barack Obama is capable of shame.”

USA TODAY: Palin ‘governed from the center,’ went after big oil. Not quite the slant we’ve been seeing from other media. Tom Maguire notes the contrast too.

Plus, widespread media confusion: “The idea that Ms. Palin thinks we are on a mission from God fits so nicely with the libs preferred vision of her as a religious nut-job that getting these reporters to do a bit of research is an uphill struggle. But I pray they will run clarifications. And a theological note to Charles Gibson – my praying it is so does not make it so.”

MORE ON IKE FROM BRENDAN LOY, who says a storm surge catastrophe is likely. Meanwhile in Knoxville we’ve got storm-generated gas shortages, but there are no lines. In fact, I drove by an Exxon station a little while ago that looked deserted, and I wondered if it was because they were out of gas. But no, they had gas — at $4.69 a gallon. Pricing signals work . . . .

A SIDE TO INFLIGHT WIFI I SHOULD HAVE FORESEEN: “American Airlines flight attendants are urging the world’s largest carrier to filter its in-flight Internet service to block access to pornography and other Web sites the workers said were inappropriate.”

Those content filters are lame, though.

WOMANHOOD as a state of mind:

It’s funny. The left has been whining about having their patriotism questioned for so long it feels like they started griping in the Mesozoic era. Feminists have argued for decades that womanhood is an existential and metaphysical state of enlightenment. But they have no problem questioning whether women they hate are really women at all.

Since we know from basic science that Palin is a woman — she’s had five kids, for starters — it’s clear that these ideological thugs aren’t talking about actual, you know, facts. They’re doing what people of totalitarian mind-sets always do: bully heretics, demonize enemies, whip the troops into line.

Doesn’t seem to be working that well, though. And some feminists are unamused.