MICHAEL MOYNIHAN: One upside to a down dollar.

THE DECLINE OF THE office phone call.

IT’S ALL PART OF THE PROCESS: It depends on what the meaning of pledged is.

TIGERHAWK ON Yale’s free speech problems.

IN MY EARLIER POST on data backups for non-techies, I asked people for their experience with online backup programs. People were generally pretty happy.

Carbonite, JungleDisk, and Mozy all got good reviews from InstaPundit readers. (Somehow, I’d managed not to even hear about JungleDisk.) And reader Bo McIlvain makes a good point:

As an IT professional, I have wrestled with backup for my tiny home office and network for many years, and in my opinion on-line backups are THE answer because they actually get your data offsite, which is one of the main reasons to back up. The worst and most likely disaster any of us face is a fire which physically destroys the location of your computer. For most, who back up to tape or CD, this would destroy the backup also unless you take your backups to your safe-deposit box occasionally – something of a pain.

The main problem with online backups is the slow bandwidth most people have available so that first backup can take an impossibly long time. I have Verizon’s FIOS service, and find I can back up about 10 gigs of data in a day. I use the IDrive-E service, which sells 150 GB of storage for $4.00/month, which beats the heck out of media costs for tape or DVD. They offer encrypted storage for your files which I guess is fine, but since I’m an untrusting sod (privacy only exists in the absence of court orders), I use Winzip to zip up a Windows Backup file and use 256 bit encryption of my own. Further, since IDrive-E is selling uncompressed space which they certainly compress to their advantage, I send them only compressed data and get more for my money.

This approach is not for your typical user, but computer geeks can get a great deal this way. For the non-technical, the service will back up your data on a file-by-file basis, and every time you get on line the service checks to see if you’ve modified your files and backs them up automatically if you want. My only problem with that is that they certainly keep a private key to your encrypted files, and I’m not willing to give that up.

The advantage of offsite backups is, as noted, that your data stay safe when bad things happen to your “site.” The disadvantage is bandwidth, and the fact that your giving somebody else custody of your data. Meanwhile, here’s more advice from Donald Sensing. And Kingsley Browne emails:

Prompted by the same radio advertisements you mentioned, I have used the Carbonite backup system. I have never had to restore from it, although I have tested it, and the files I restored were just fine.

Carbonite is limited to backing up internal hard drives. I initially had signed up for a free trial and then discovered this fact. At the time, the bulk of my files (which are mostly photographs) were stored on external drives. So, I canceled the Carbonite. I got a new computer a few months ago that has a 1 TB hard drive and decided it was time to give Carbonite a try.

If you want to use Carbonite to back up a lot of data, you need patience. They say that the first back-up can take a few days (but that restoring is much faster). I was backing up about 350 GB of files, and it took over two months. I had other back-up, so this was not a problem. It works in the background and never seems to slow the computer down. It then automatically keeps the back-up current (keeping deleted files and older versions of files for a while in case you discover that you need them).

For the $50 or so per year that it costs, I think it is a good value for “belt and suspenders” types. (I have external hard drives backing up my internal hard drives — one set of drives attached to my computer, and another set stored off-site). I don’t claim that my pictures are objectively worth all this back-up effort, but they are important to me.

And that’s what matters.

AN “EXPLOSIVE” E.U. CORRUPTION REPORT?

OUCH: “To call the articles ‘law office history’ might be unfair to law offices.” The Reynolds in question, I should note, is no relation.

CORRUPTION AND REFORM: An interview with Larry Lessig. Quoth Lessig: “In fact, one of the reasons why the Framers were small-government people was not a deep belief in libertarianism but a recognition that the more money flows through Washington, the more risk of corruption.”

I agree. And I’ve had some related thoughts here.

NATALIE PORTMAN: Skeptical about capitalism, but not about Hillary! “She’s so much more polished and experienced than anyone else.”

WORRIES ABOUT CARBON TAXES are short-circuiting coal-plant construction. “Utilities canceled or put on hold at least 45 coal plants in development last year, according to a new analysis by the US Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory in Pittsburgh. These moves – a sharp reversal from a year ago, when the industry had more than 150 such plants in development – signal the waning of a major US expansion into coal. . . . ‘What you’re seeing is a de facto moratorium on coal power right now,’ says Robert Linden, a senior oil and gas analyst at Pace Global in New York. ”

Upside: Burning coal sucks. Downside: More power to the oil kleptocrats. Solution: Nice clean nukes?

THE AUDACITY OF HYPE: “Scientists and environmentalists have attacked a global campaign to ban plastic bags which they say is based on flawed science and exaggerated claims. . . . scientists, politicians and marine experts attacked the Government for joining a ‘bandwagon’ based on poor science.”

ADVICE ON backing up data for non-techies. It’s not that hard, and — trust me — you can never have too many backups. One thing the discussion leaves out is the prospect of online backups like Carbonite, etc. I hear them advertised on the radio, but I’ve never tried ’em. Anybody out there have any experience with backups — and restores — using those services?

CHINA THWARTS ISLAMIC TERROR PLOT AGAINST THE OLYMPICS. according to this report. Lawhawk wonders if the Chinese are covering up a bigger problem.

HOW HAVE I LIVED WITHOUT ONE? An Etch-a-Sketch clock.

FALLING DOWN on the Hispanic vote.

HASTERT’S SEAT GOES DEMOCRATIC: This should be a wake-up call to the GOP delegation, but they’ve hit the snooze bar so many times that I doubt it will do much good.

A REAL-LIFE DEATH STAR? Just when you thought it was safe to quit worrying about gamma-ray bursts . . . .

DOES SPRINGING FORWARD PRODUCE more automobile accidents? I don’t know, but it does seem to leave people crabbier for a couple of days. It’s like national jetlag.

NICK COHEN: Why Brits don’t swoon over Obama.

IN THE MAIL: Joe Pappalardo’s Sunflowers: The Secret History. Did they really cause Hitler to invade Russia?

DOES MCCAIN HAVE CANCER? Well, no. (Via Protein Wisdom, where this comment appears: “The author of this story — Dr. Lawrence K. Altman — is likely still waiting for Bill Clinton’s medical records. Whether the paper will maintain its level of sloth when the subject is a Republican remains to be seen.”)

“I LOVED THAT JET:” A reminiscence on flying the SR-71. I like this bit: “It was the fastest we would ever fly. I pulled the throttles to idle just south of Sicily, but we still overran the refueling tanker awaiting us over Gibraltar.”

THE SNL SPOOF of Hillary’s 3 a.m. ad. Video at the link. Note the absence of Bill on the pillow behind Hillary . . . .

HILLARY CLINTON and Rwanda. Kind of like her Irish peacemaking.

SOME THOUGHTS ON THE WAR:

1) Advisors: We need more.

2) Afghanistan: We’re losing.

3) War of Ideas: We should fight one.

I agree, particularly on item 3.