Archive for 2007

WITHOUT A COURT ORDER, Google gives up IP of anonymous blogger.

UPDATE: Compare Amazon.

ANOTHER UPDATE: More on the Amazon case from Orin Kerr: “Seems kinda weird to me: can bad reporting by the press make perfectly lawful investigations unlawful?”

MORE: Further thoughts here: “In terms of the law, here’s what I don’t get, or rather, here’s one of the several things I don’t get: If public misunderstanding of Judge Crocker’s decision makes the otherwise constitutional subpoena unconstitutional, can’t Judge Crocker write his opinion in a calming and soothing way to make the subpoena constitutional? Or are bloggers and their fiery rhetoric really that incorrigible?”

SETTING A NEW HIGH IN JOURNALISTIC LAMENESS: The Details power list. Really, this reads like a parody. And it is one — just not necessarily an intentional one . . .

ANDREW LUBIN:

Now that the war in Iraq is over . . . what can the military do better in Afghanistan?

OK, we’ve not exactly won, but Gen Petraeus is sending a BCT home from Diyala Province and not replacing it. The “Concerned Citizens” Groups south of Baghdad, the Sunni “Anbar Awakening” are standing up in numbers and professionalism that was unimagined even 18 months ago. Do the Iraqi’s like us? Hard to say, but so long as they’re not killing us, let’s be thankful for these small victories and let’s pray that the trend continues.

Now, can we do the same in Afghanistan? We’ve got the same impressive military, AND some reasonable support from NATO. Plus we’ve been at it since 2001…so why aren’t we rocking thru Afghanistan?

Because our message sucks.

Read the whole thing. It certainly seems that a lot of different people are worried about our approach in Afghanistan.

JOEL KOTKIN on the rise of family-friendly cities. “Married people with children tend to be both successful and motivated, precisely the people who make economies go.” I’ve been a fan on Kotkin’s for a while — this contrarian book, written at the height of Japan-related American declinism, argued that America’s resilience would win out over Japan’s bureaucratic planning. And he was certainly right.

EDUCATION ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT, from Naomi Wolf: “Few young Americans understand that the Second Amendment keeps their homes safe from the kind of government intrusion that other citizens suffer around the world; few realize that ‘due process’ means that they can’t be locked up in a dungeon by the state and left to languish indefinitely.”

UPDATE: A couple of readers think that Naomi Wolf meant the Fourth Amendment, not the Second, but I’m sure they’re wrong. First, she’s writing about Constitutional ignorance, so I’m sure she took time to review the Bill of Rights herself. Second, if she had made that kind of error, one of the layers of editors at the Post would have caught it. Third, her statement is correct on the merits.

DON SURBER: “We won.”

Perhaps a bit premature, but read the whole thing.

HEH: “Universal’s CEO Once Called iPod Users Thieves. Now He’s Giving Songs Away.”

IF I WERE A SHAREHOLDER, I THINK I’D COMPLAIN: “Dismal returns for politically themed films in 2007 won’t stop the genre from continuing well into next year.”

It’s as if they don’t care about shareholder returns at all in Hollywood.