Archive for 2007

THE NRO EDITORS CHALLENGE THE WALL STREET JOURNAL EDITORS to a debate on immigration.

A BLOG DUSTUP IN NASHVILLE: Bob Krumm has more background.

Here’s the post that started it all. I don’t agree with it, but it seems relatively tame to me. It’s no “screw ’em,” that’s for sure.

UPDATE: Michael Silence: “The bottom line: The intent to drive traffic is working.”

We’ve been had. D’oh!

HUMAN SHIELDS in Iraq.

DRINKING FROM A FIREHOSE:

One of America’s busiest guys these days is Mark Corallo of Corallo Comstock Inc. in Alexandria. He’s the media strategist and former Justice Department public affairs director who is the public voice of Fred Thompson’s prospective presidential campaign. A few hours after The Politico reported on Wednesday morning that the actor and former senator was moving swiftly toward declaring his candidacy, Corallo e-mailed: “The response is unreal. Total explosion. Can’t keep up with the incoming. Received over 300 e-mails from people who want to contribute and/or volunteer. Drinking from the fire hose.”

Hey, if Al Gore gets in the race, we might wind up with two Tennesseans facing off in the general election.

HARIRI UPDATE:

The U.N. Security Council voted Wednesday to unilaterally establish an international tribunal to prosecute suspects in the killing of Lebanon’s former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri whose supporters celebrated by dancing in the streets of Beirut.

The vote at U.N. headquarters in New York was 10-0 with five abstentions _ Russia, China, South Africa, Indonesia and Qatar. Nine votes were needed for passage.

South Africa hasn’t really lived up to its human-rights reputation. Still, that’s a bit of a surprise. The others, not so much.

Michael Totten observes: “What Assad fears most has come to pass.”

UPDATE: Reader Mike Hertz makes a good point:

I’m not quite sure what the Post means when it says that the Security Council “unilaterally” established a tribunal. I thought a decision taken by the Council was, by definition, collective. Does “unilateral” simply mean that the Post disapproves? Or that the U.S. was part of the group that took action (much like the Iraq coalition was referrred to as unilateral)?

Any group involving the U.S. is “unilateral,” I guess.

VIRGINIA POSTREL: “Kidney patients need ACT-UP. Instead, they’ve got the way-too-complacent National Kidney Foundation, an organization more for doctors than patients. Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, Lisa Cunningham has died. She’s the woman Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center told it would refuse to transplant if she found a kidney donor through local press coverage.”

AN ARGUMENT FOR TERM LIMITS? “The authors study the make-up of Congress since 1789 with a view to tracking ‘the self-perpetuation of political elites’. They find that, the longer the tenure of a legislator, the more likely his relatives are to enter Congress later.”

MORE SKEPTICISM about the FBI.

OKAY THIS IS STUPID:

The Bush administration said Tuesday it will fight to keep meatpackers from testing all their animals for mad cow disease.

The Agriculture Department tests fewer than 1 percent of slaughtered cows for the disease, which can be fatal to humans who eat tainted beef. A beef producer in the western state of Kansas, Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, wants to test all of its cows.

Larger meat companies feared that move because, if Creekstone should test its meat and advertised it as safe, they might have to perform the expensive tests on their larger herds as well.

The Agriculture Department regulates the test and argued that widespread testing could lead to a false positive that would harm the meat industry.

The dangers of false positives from mass testing are not trivial, as evidenced in discussions of mass-testing for HIV. Nonetheless, this is hardly the same thing. As I’ve noted before, food testing is something we’re not doing well, and we ought to do better. The meat industry people are just afraid of competition from “real food” producers and the like, and don’t want to give them an opening.

I mean, do we want China to be our model?

GREENHOUSE UPDATE:

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday that she followed all Senate rules when she accepted rides on a private jet from a longtime benefactor.

“Whatever I’ve done, I complied with Senate rules at the time. That’s the way every senator operates,” the Democratic presidential contender said in an interview with The Associated Press during a campaign stop in Las Vegas. . . .

Sen. Clinton, who complained about corporate America’s largesse and skyrocketing executive pay during campaign events Wednesday, said she did not believe her message was undermined by her acceptance of the private flights. In line with Senate rules then in effect, Clinton’s campaign has said she reimbursed Gupta at the cost of a first-class flight, typically a significant discount off the expense of a private jet.

“Those were the rules. You’ll have to ask somebody else whether that’s good policy,” she said.

Senate rules or not, it’s bad for the planet. Doesn’t anyone care?

ED MORRISSEY INTERVIEWS John McCain and Mitt Romney.

UPDATE: Social conservatives backing Rudy? Interesting discussion in the Powerline forum.

MISS UNIVERSE BOOS AND U.S. / MEXICAN RELATIONS: “For what it’s worth, I think this kind of episode has more impact on Americans’ attitudes toward other countries than is generally recognized. The fact that millions of Americans witnessed the rudeness in Mexico City will not make matters easier for those who are pushing immigration legislation in Congress.”

It’s not a big deal, but that’s right. “We hate you — let us in!” is a poor approach.

DANIEL DREZNER AND MEGAN MCARDLE on BloggingHeads TV.

THE STOCK MARKET CONTINUES TO BURN HOT:

Wall Street shot higher Wednesday, sending the Standard & Poor’s 500 index to its first record close in more than seven years, as investors grew more confident that the Federal Reserve might cut interest rates in the second half of 2007. The Dow Jones industrials also reached a new high close.

I credit the new Democratic Congress! What does this mean? Beats me. I tend to be bearish on the markets — every new high looks to me like the top before the plunge. But I’m usually wrong: Like Paul Krugman, I’ve predicted nine of the past two recessions.

TERROR IN THE SKIES: An update on Flight 327, from Orin Kerr.

UPDATE: Much, much more here.

DECLARING VICTORY IN THE WAR against global warming! Yeah, it’s just weather, not climate — but they won’t be saying that in July.

Er, unless there’s snow.

IT’S A FESTIVAL OF FRED (THOMPSON) at ElephantBiz.

A RESPONSE TO LAURIE DAVID ON GLOBAL WARMING at The Huffington Post: “If we really want to StopGlobalWarming, we’ve got to curb our enthusiasm for whatever is new and easy.”

Well, in Laurie David’s case it’s new, easy, and hypocritical. It’s fine to take environmentalism beyond its hairshirt phase, but her stuff seems more. . . opportunistic.