Archive for 2003

PEJMAN YOUSEFZADEH has a column on nanotechnology in today’s TechCentralStation.

MAX POWER writes:

It’s appallingly symptomatic that an anti-war group is appropriating the spectre of nuclear war in a commercial against stopping Iraq’s attempt to obtain nuclear weapons. I’m not a W fan, but there’s something wrong with someone who has more faith in Saddam Hussein’s control of nuclear weapons than Bush’s.

Yes, but then I remember when the left was actually opposed to fascist dictators.

I’m not the first to ask this question, but why aren’t there antinuclear protests outside Iraqi and North Korean embassies?

WELL, WE NOW HAVE A REDONE WALK-IN CLOSET off the master bedroom. The redo gives us a lot more space. Of course, so did throwing away all the stuff we threw away when we emptied the closet out, and the other stuff we threw away when we put the stuff back.

I don’t want to think about which part — the free part, or the expensive part — did the most good. And I shouldn’t, anyway, because the free part wouldn’t have happened without the expensive part. Hmm. There are whole sectors of the economy built on this phenomenon.

HERE’S A LONGER ARTICLE about the Racine rave raids’ inglorious end. Great work by the ACLU and the EMDEF.

UPDATE: I’ve got more on this case over at GlennReynolds.com.

MICHAEL MOORE has been rejected as commencement speaker at Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism. There was quite an email debate over the subject. Here’s my favorite line:

One student chimed in that the speaker should be Chris Rock: “I’d be happy with a comedian, just not a comedian who poses as a journalist.”

I don’t really think that Michael Moore is a comedian. But I don’t think he’s a journalist, either.

UPDATE: Reader L. Neil Swanson writes: “Perhaps Moore is best described as an ‘inadvertent comedian’. ”

HOWARD KURTZ WRITES:

Of course, the folks who seem most upset by affirmative action don’t seem terribly concerned about preferential treatment for children of alumni.

You hear this all the time. But I think it’s a bogus comparison. The reason why we have laws against race discrimination, rather than laws demanding strict meritocracy in all things, is — or at least so I thought — that race discrimination is much, much worse than merely favoring alumni.

The logical implication of statements comparing racial discrimination with legacy preferences for alumni is that racial discrimination isn’t uniquely bad. But is that true? But for an accident of history, might Martin Luther King have been leading marches against legacy preferences, or athletic recruiting? I don’t think so.

UPDATE: In a related matter, SpinSanity says that Democrats’ charges that Bush “opposes civil rights” are unfair.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Steve Verdon has a question about this.

MEGAN MCARDLE, who has now seen the Media Matters show on weblogs (I have to wait until Sunday), has been getting email from people wanting to know how to start a blog. She has advice that is, characteristically, useful and clear.

WHY I DON’T HAVE COMMENTS: Because past a certain level of traffic, comments turn into a chatboard. Or even a trollboard. And I don’t have the time to police them. But I can’t beat this response from Colby Cosh to people who complain.

DON’T CLICK ON THIS LINK unless you’ve got a high-speed connection, or a lot of patience. It’s a four-minute film by the Marine Corps on Afghanistan, with hints of an unspecified war to come. Very well done.

The reader who sent the link says it will be playing in movie theaters later this month.

EARLIER TODAY, I posted a photo and blurb about the Pink Pistols, but here’s the whole story. Excerpt:

The alleged intruder survived the neck wound last March and was charged with breaking and entering. Miner said she doesn’t know if she was targeted because she lives openly with her girlfriend in the Boston suburb of Arlington, Mass.

But like other members of a burgeoning group called the Pink Pistols, she’s challenging the notion that gays and guns don’t mix. . . .

Read the whole thing.

RACINE, WISCONSIN HAS FOLDED, as it should have, and is dropping its dumb rave prosecutions as well as promising not to do it again, in exchange for not being sued into bankruptcy. Maybe the Houston example did some good.

(Via TalkLeft).

DONALD SENSING WRITES that the “peace movement” doesn’t deserve credit for good intentions, because it doesn’t have good intentions. His brush is perhaps a bit broad — there are certainly people who are well-intentioned and honorable who oppose the idea of war in Iraq, though I think that they’re wrong — but in terms of the organized movement, well, he’s more or less on-target.

Meanwhile there’s a march on Washington this weekend (yeah, another one, and it’s organized by A.N.S.W.E.R. again, apparently.) If any bloggers are attending and posting accounts and pictures, please let me know. Meanwhile, here’s more about A.N.S.W.E.R.

I wonder if the Washington Post’s Evelyn Nieves will write another piece quoting antiwar protesters about how successful their movement is?

UPDATE: Christopher Johnson has comments, too. And Steven Den Beste responds to some conspiracy theories.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Justin Katz has some comments, too. And Christopher Hitchens has some tart observations.

SHOULDER-FIRED MISSILES are a threat to airliners, and not much is being done about it. Maybe someone should tell TNR.

THE SNOW WAS FUN. We got about three inches, which the local media treated like the blizzard of the century. When I got home my wife and daughter were outside — my wife went in, I went back out, and we walked in the snow and had a snowball fight with some local kids. Got back and my wife was making homemade chicken soup. The only downside: my daughter’s bummed that she won’t get out of school tomorrow because it’s already a holiday. Oh, well.

I’m going to sit in front of the fire and drink a cognac later. That’s what snowy weather is for, right?

THE DISSIDENT FROGMAN OBSERVES:

Maybe some chaos theory (no pun intended) could explain the convergence.

Nonetheless:

– Socialists invented the death camps.

– Socialists developed the death camps.

– A bunch of Capitalists “cow-boys” liberated some death camps and wiped out some (National-)Socialists.

– Other Socialists still run death camps.

And guess who’s going to take care of the problem again?

Most probably the same bunch of Capitalist “cow-boys” (their sons actually).

God bless them.

And their daughters, too. (Parallel French blog entry omitted).

IT’S SNOWING HERE. That doesn’t bother me, but it’s set off the predictable panic, so my 4 o’clock appointment has been moved up to 3:00. Back later.