OPEN THREAD: Hump Day.

THIS IS THE WAY:

WHERE WE ARE TODAY:

FEDERAL LAW, HOW DOES IT WORK?

Related: Byron York on immigration law: Federal government has enforcement authority.

Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said that, despite what Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass think, state and local governments do not have the authority to enforce immigration laws — only the federal government does.

Bass defended her resistance to the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement on CNN’s The Situation Room, where she responded to the network’s new poll finding that 54% of people approve of the administration’s program to deport illegal immigrants. However, Bass said she does not believe this poll is accurate and that federal agents were “overstepping,” taking away power from the state.

In response, York clarified that the federal government has the sole authority to enforce immigration law.

York recalled the Obama administration, when Arizona officials told former President Barack Obama, “You are not enforcing immigration laws, so we’ll do it.” Obama said no, the issue went to court, and the president won.

“The ruling is the federal government has the sole authority to do this,” York said Tuesday on Fox News’s America’s Newsroom. “So when Karen Bass says, ‘It is like the federal government is coming in and taking our state and local authority,’ no, they don’t have any state and local authority.”

Beyond the Supreme Court, what is this about “calling 911?” I thought that such calls were rendered déclassé and infra dig in uber-woke Minnesota during 2020’s Summer of Love:

UPDATE (FROM GLENN): Sounds like Brian O’Hara just gave rise to a criminal conspiracy case against the police department and him.

HUGE WIN FOR FANS OF GAS-GUZZLERS AS TRUMP KILLS OFF HATED BIDEN-ERA RULE:

President Donald Trump is trying to tear up America’s fuel-economy roadmap — again.

On Wednesday, Trump said he’s rolling back the Biden administration’s mileage standards, pitching it as a way to make cars cheaper.

But critics say it’ll do the opposite, leaving drivers to burn more gas and spend more cash.

Trump’s move unwinds the federal CAFE rules — the fuel-economy standards that require automakers to build cars that travel farther on less fuel.

Those rules are the reason hybrids exist at scale. Automakers developed them to meet rising efficiency targets long before EVs took off.

Gavin Newsom hardest hit: Senate votes to block California’s rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. The resolution will now head to the White House, where President Donald Trump is expected to sign it.

IN NEW YORK, SCRAPPY LOCAL NEWSPAPER STRUGGLES FOR SURVIVAL:

Given that the Times has to keep its leftist subscriber base as coddled as possible, these gaping news gaps just keep happening there. As Byron York wrote on September 24th of 2008, “Today is a red-letter day for the New York Times. For the first time, the paper has reported in its news section that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright once uttered the phrase ‘God damn America.’” Flashforward to the middle of 2021:

Scott Bessent reminds Andrew Sorkin, about another minor story the Gray Lady memory holed from 2020 until the summer of 2024:

…”I actually don’t read the New York Times anymore,” Bessent tells Sorkin. “Occasionally people send me articles and there’s just this fever swamp. You had what was one of the greatest scandals of all time… Joe Biden’s diminished capacity and the cover-up. Where was the New York Times?”

To be fair, we know where the New York Times was:

Just think of the Times’ staffers as Democratic Party operatives with bylines, and it all makes sense.

(Classical reference in headline.)

THERE DOES NEED TO BE ACCOUNTABILITY. SO FAR THERE HAS BEEN NONE.

THREAD:

GREAT MOMENTS IN REPUBLICAN FAILURE THEATER:

 

MILE MARKERS ON THE ROAD TO DETROIT: With Shake Shack’s exit, SF’s most troubled mall is down to one restaurant.

One of the last remaining strongholds of San Francisco Centre near Union Square is closing its doors for good.

Shake Shack, the burger joint located in the basement food court at 845 Market St., is closing permanently on Dec. 18, according to a Nov. 25 WARN filing to state labor officials.

The closure eliminates 26 jobs and leaves just one remaining restaurant — Panda Express — inside what was once San Francisco’s biggest and most lucrative mall. San Francisco Centre has been hemorrhaging tenants since the summer, which saw the departure of at least six food vendors.

According to the notice, the closure was prompted by the sale of the building and the new owner’s requirement that all tenants vacate the premises. All 26 employees impacted by the closure have been offered continued employment with no break in service, the same title, and the same rate of pay at nearby Shake Shack locations, the notice stated.

Shake Shack’s exit comes on the heels of a rough few years for the beleaguered, 1.5 million-square-foot mall, which has seen a steady decline in foot traffic post-pandemic with the departures of anchor tenants Bloomingdale’s and Nordstrom. It is currently at 9% occupancy.

Oh, and speaking of Bloomingdale’s and Nordstrom in San Francisco Centre: Truth behind death spiral in state’s most famous mall after Nordstrom & Bloomingdale’s closures.

Some famous and notable locations, like the San Francisco Centre in California, have been in turmoil for some time now.

At least 93% of the San Francisco Centre is now vacant, according to Trepp real estate data obtained by The Wall Street Journal.

It’s a nine-level complex that’s losing millions of dollars every year due to struggles with rampant shoplifting, drug use, and homelessness in the surrounding area.

TRAGIC DOWNFALL

These factors have lead many top retailers to leave, with the pandemic dealing a fatal blow after being closed off and on for seven months.

Some, like Nordstrom and Bloomingdale’s held on for longer, but eventually left in the past two years.

The two department store giants held at least 40% of the mall’s space, with slightly smaller tenants like Zara and John Varvatos leaving after.

It was even reported recently that, during one weekday afternoon, security guards, clerks, and janitorial staff outnumbered shoppers.

Gooder and harder, San Fran.

DOG BITES MAN: Democrats reject idea of constitutional amendment mandating balanced budgets.

In light of the nation’s $38 trillion national debt, U.S. House lawmakers met Wednesday to discuss ways to structure a constitutional amendment mandating that Congress pass deficit-neutral budgets.

The House Judiciary subcommittee, however, produced no concrete plan and lawmakers mainly engaged in partisan blame games, even as multiple witnesses there to testify outlined possible solutions.

The U.S. has spent more money than it takes in for decades, resulting in skyrocketing deficits each year. In fiscal year 2025, the federal deficit – the gap between spending and revenue – amounted to roughly $1.8 trillion, the Congressional Budget Office estimated.

“The debt ceiling is a joke…a political football,” David Walker, chair of the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation, told lawmakers. “The only thing that can bind current and future congresses and presidents is a constitutional amendment.”

Republicans, who mostly support such an amendment, say the debt and deficit problem is caused by excessive spending, and that the solution is enforced spending restraint.

Exactly.

InstaPundit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.