JAMES LILEKS: "You can say this for winter: when it’s five below at one in the morning and the wind makes worried moans, it’s good to be inside with a fire and a toddy and similar boons of civilization." Plus, a Jessica Rabbit reference.
FOX, CNN, AND NBC HAVE CALLED IT FOR MCCAIN. Huckabee is second, and Fred Thompson still seems to be holding onto third. I think this is pretty big -- If McCain can win South Carolina convincingly, he can win conservatives, and if Huckabee can't win in South Carolina, where can he win? And a third-place finish is good enough to keep Thompson going, I think -- especially when a lot of his votes come out of Huckabee's hide, since Thompson clearly isn't a Huckabee fan.
UPDATE: I'm watching Huckabee's concession speech and all of a sudden he's talking about the evils of big government.
ANOTHER UPDATE: We're at my dad's and he's happy that Romney's fourth, so he can't claim "a bronze." The Olympic analogies are getting old.
OOPS: "AMERICA’S favourite television presenter is paying a painful price for her intervention in the US presidential campaign last month. Oprah Winfrey has been dubbed a 'traitor' by some of her female fans for supporting Barack Obama instead of Hillary Clinton."
AT THE MOMENT, THOMPSON IS IN THIRD PLACE, but it's close with only 33% of the vote in. Here's a report that it's gloomy at Fred HQ. He gave a great speech, though. I don't see why he'd quit the race before Super Tuesday, especially if he pulls 3rd in South Carolina.
UPDATE: 68% in now, but still about the same so far.
DUNCAN HUNTER IS QUITTING. Our podcast interview with Hunter is here.
BASED ON EXIT POLLS, CNN says it's a close race for #1 in South Carolina between McCain and Huckabee and for #3 between Thompson and Romney, but too close to call.
HOW THE WORLD views Obama. "The European right appears more enthusiastic about the liberal Obama than the left. . . . The Latin American left, sensing that the story of racial mobility implicit in Obama's personal story is too good an ad for American society, has chosen to moderate its embrace of the black American senator. "
FOX HAS JUST CALLED NEVADA FOR HILLARY. Obama's behind, but not all that close. A fairly big win for Hillary, I think -- judging by how stressed she and Bill have seemed this week, they obviously thought a loss in Nevada would have been very damaging.
SOME MODEST PROGRESS FOR CIVIL RIGHTS IN TENNESSEE: "The state Senate voted 24-6 on Wednesday to authorize Tennesseans with pistol carry permits to take their weapons into establishments that sell alcohol, so long as they don't drink themselves."
I'M BEING SUPPRESSED: "Bill Clinton, speaking at a Vegas YMCA last night, made more charges against Obama and claimed to have, with Chelsea, personally witnessed voter suppression by the Culinary Workers." Hey, some of them carry cleavers.
WILL SUPER-DELEGATES sink the Democrats? I've made a similar point myself. Too much insider politics may turn off Democratic voters, particularly if Hillary is the beneficiary.
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: "After reading most of the McCain animus on conservative blogs, I’m a little worried that some of it goes over the top. . . . McCain’s past support for the flawed immigration bill, McCain-Feingold, and opposition to tax cuts, as well as temper flare-ups at those who questioned his conservative fides are legitimate concerns. But many believe that the two key issues right now are winning, in conservative fashion, the war in all its theaters, and controlling out-of-control spending. He seems in the forefront there. Moreover it seems odd to fault him for telling the truth—however politically unwise—that all the jobs in the automotive industry simply aren’t coming back as before."
STANLEY KURTZ: "The mainstream media is now the key to the battle against Canada’s so-called human rights commissions. Despite the sensation on the blogosphere, the Ezra Levant inquisition is being ignored by big media in Canada, and here."
TAKING "PREPAREDNESS" TO THE NEXT LEVEL. Reader James Rummel writes:
I read the Popular Mechanics article that you linked to, the one that discusses the various Terminators that have been introduced over the years. Thank you kindly for brining it to my attention.
Speaking as an old shooting enthusiast, I noticed while watching the two available episodes of Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles that the various weaponry deployed against the kill-crazy deathbots wasn't very effective. They are just too well armored, too well built. But I suppose a .50 sniper rifle would still make some holes since it was designed to defeat armor.
I have wondered why the anti-gun lobby wants to ban the .50's, even though they have yet to be used in a crime. Maybe they have sold out to the enemy of all mankind in the hopes that they will be spared? It makes as much sense as any for their irrational hysteria against these weapons.
I also noticed that the Terminators in the TV show will shut down for a few minutes if they come in to contact with electric current, even current as mild as standard house current. Popular Mechanics back in October mentioned a new TASER device that could be fired from a standard shotgun. This increased the range from 15 feet to over 100. It might very well be the only hope for mankind!
You might be wondering why I am so interested in the subject, a TV show based off of a fictional war where a computer network named Skynet nukes most of humanity before trying to exterminate the survivors. But did you know that the British have already set up a military satellite communications system which is named Skynet?
Right about now I bet you're thinking that adding a .50 Barrett and a few TASERS to your home defense arsenal might not be a bad idea.
"Adding?"
UPDATE: Reader Darren Duvall, MD emails:
Your correspondent Mr Rummel is incorrect that the .50 BMG has not been used in a crime. A police officer was killed in Colorado with one in 1995 or 1996.
I'm not anti-50 cal, but it does pay to be as accurate as possible when it comes to contentious issues. The VPC and their hoplophobic ilk are against .50 caliber rifles because they are a small segment of the firearms market that can be marginalized, period. It is entirely accurate to say that they are virtually never used to commit crimes.
My personal choice for an anti-Terminator weapon is an EFP. A molten copper slug at 5,000 fps beats the Taser. If the Terminators attack, it may turn out that the Iranian defense plants are our last, best hope. Weird world.
Heh.
ERROR CORRECTION UPDATE: The above contains an error:
This is absolutely untrue. The incident he refers to is the death of Deputy Sheriff Timothy Mossbrucker in Jefferson County, Colorado in April of 1995. Deputy Mossbrucker was killed by Albert Petrosky as the deputy responded to a "shot fired" call at a small shoping mall. The suspect had gone there to kill his wife and her boyfriend (her boss) after he found out they were having an affair.(he did kill both of them) He then waited in the parking lot for the cops to show up (I suspect so his death would be a suicide by cops). Deputy Mossbrucker was the first unit in. The suspect shot him three times through the windshield of his police unit killing him instantly with an 7.39 SKS rifle.
The problem was, Petrosky had thrown every gun he owned into the bed of his pickup to go have his 15 minutes of glory. Included in those firearms was a LAR Grizzley big bore 50 BMG. There were also 5 empty 50 caliber casings in the bed of the truck that probably were thrown into the bed the last time he had been out shooting the rifle. There is no evidence to indicate he fired the 50 BMG during his shootout with the cops.
The suspect was taken into custody a short time later but committed suicide in his jail cell before he was ever brought to trial.
The reason they claim he killed the deputy is the press was allowed access to the crime scene about an hour after the shooting and the photographer took a photo of the LAR Grizzley and the fifty cal ammo. He just created the headlines "Deputy Killed By 50 BMG" for the next day's paper.
That's from John Burtt of the Fifty Cal Institute, via Prof. Joseph Olson.
I went out at about 1:00 to vote. There had been a total 220 voters at our polling station when we got there. The weather is getting worse, so I will be surprised if the number of voters at our polling station doubles by closing time. I'm a Fred supporter, so I've been happy to hear about his resurgence. However, I didn't see any Thompson signs around the school where I voted. The only candidates represented along the road where McCain, Huckabee and Romney. I'm not sure what any of this means (if anything), but I thought I'd send it your way on the outside chance that it's a useful data point.
REMEMBERING the original Mazda RX-7. "Like the Datsun 240Z a decade before, the RX-7 revolutionized the sports car market. With performance easily on a par with the Porsche 924 and close to that of the contemporary Chevrolet Corvette, but at a vastly lower price, the RX-7 became a legend. It was an immediate smash sales success, became the first sports car for a generation of young drivers, and quickly established itself as a force on the race track." I had one of those -- a 1980 model -- and it was a great car, though with some rough spots. What I like about the RX-8 is that it recaptures the feel of the original RX-7, but without the rough spots.
THIS SEEMS LIKE BIG NEWS: "The CIA on Friday admitted that cyberattacks have caused at least one power outage affecting multiple cities outside the United States." (Via Slashdot).
Fox just called Nevada for Mitt Romney. Huckabee's currently showing #5, behind McCain, Thompson, and Ron Paul, though only a small percentage of votes are actually in.
UPDATE: Bob Krumm is in South Carolina and says people care more about the snow that's falling than about the primary now: "Snow-just the mention of snow- might make all turnout predictions worthless here."
It's also snowing in Atlanta. Not a flake here, so far.
ANOTHER UPDATE: A report from Nevada reader Charles Chase -- click "read more" to read it.
Glenn: Am a daily reader. Thought that I would pass along to you what I observed in Sparks, NV this morning. I am a Republican who has voted in every election and primary since 1956 [and voted for myself in 1972 as the Republican nominee for Congress in California's 11th district [San Mateo County].
I left my home which is two or three miles from my assigned site at Reed High School in Sparks, NV. Immediately ran into a horrible traffic jam, and when I finally got to the school there was no parking left. I had to park across the street at a shopping center and take the long walk to the high school in 24 degree temperatures. When I got there, there was a very long line four abreast in front of the school and which snaked down the side. When I got to the halfway point of the line, it appeared as though the end of the line was quite far away, and I would estimate that I still had to about an eighth or quarter of a mile just to get to the end.
What the Republican leaders did, was have every Republican in Sparks, NV go to exactly one place. The traffic jams and exceedingly long lines were also being reported over the radio at Galena High School and Reno High School.
Washoe County where these three polling places are located has almost 100,000 registered Republicans [this is Republican territory]. Statewide the Republicans expected a turnout of about 30,000, and the Reno Gazette Journal expected a turnout of just 8% of registered Republicans. When I saw the line, I felt like all of them had arrived at my caucus site.
At 73 years of age, and having recently been hospitalized for acute bronchitis, along with some others, I just could not cope with cold and standing in line for a long time, and turned around went to my car and came home. Because the Republican leaders are such idiots not to understand the pulse of Republicans here and arranged to have more traditional polling places, Fred lost a vote. I feel guilty for not staying but this is a terrible way to get seniors out to vote Republican.
MORE CRUSHING OF DISSENT: "A Belarus court sentenced a newspaper editor Friday to three years in prison for reprinting a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad that sparked worldwide riots when it was initially published in a Danish newspaper." When American celebrities complain about crushing of dissent in America, remind them that this is what it really looks like.
And if you don't want your religion dissed, you might as well start blowing people up. Obviously, it works. Nice incentive structure, there.
PHIL BOWERMASTER SAW CLOVERFIELD and liked it. "I'm pleased to report that Cloverfield does not disappoint on any level."
JONAH GOLDBERG IS STILL #1 on Amazon. And I hear he'll debut on the New York Times bestseller list next week. Nonetheless, I keep getting emails like this one:
I work at Barnes & Noble (in California) and we have not seen the book in our store. I checked and BN.com has it at #8 right now. I checked 4 - 5 zip codes on the BN.com web site for store availability and only one had it in the store.
This is really interesting because it is B & N's stated policy to be politics neutral about the content of books. They sent a memo around to employees explaining the policy when the OJ Simpson book came out for example. And they do have any number of controversial books on all sorts of topics all the time.
So I am somewhat mystified.
Beats me. Perhaps they underestimated its popularity. But I'm sure it's costing them sales to the Internet.
UPDATE: Reader Stephen Barron emails:
Piling on about B&N...
I live in CA but am in Wichita KS over weekend for business. I went looking for Jonah's book in one of the local B&Ns and couldn't find it. Heck, I saw Newt's book, Colbert's book, David Frum's book, etc. There was a wide variety of political persuasions represented, although I think this particular store actually leaned a little to the right, but Jonah's book was not to be seen.
And reader Todd Frehafer writes: "I wrote to Jonah about the same phenomenon in the Rt.9 Chestnut Hill, MA store. When I asked about the book, I was told it 'wasn't in stock and wasn't on order.'"
They can't stock everything, and for whatever reason didn't stock this book. So people will order it off Amazon. And next time they shop, they may go straight to the Internet and not even venture down to the store to look.
THE YEAR OF THE GUN: Brannon Denning and I have a piece on the Supreme Court and the Heller case, in See Also, the online edition of the Texas Law Review.
UPDATE: A somewhat prettier and easier to read version can be downloaded here. (Bumped to top).
DO HOUSE REPUBLICANS "GET IT?" I hope so, but "hope" is the operative word.
January 18, 2008
CALIFORNIA BUDGET BLUES. "But lost in the furor is any self-reflection, such as why would UC Davis recently pay John Edwards, multimillionaire trial lawyer, $50,000 plus to give a brief lecture on poverty? Such questions are never answered, much less raised, since the problem is always framed as a matter of a shortage of income, never a surfeit of unnecessary expenditure. . . . At some point we Californians should ask ourselves, how we inherited a state with near perfect weather, the world's richest agriculture, plentiful timber, minerals, and oil, two great ports at Los Angeles and Oakland, a natural tourist industry from Carmel to Yosemite, industries such as Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and aerospace—and serially managed to turn all of that into the nation's largest penal system, periodic near bankruptcy, and sky-high taxes."
SOMEHOW, I THINK THIS WAS OBAMA'S PLAN ALL ALONG: "John Edwards and Hillary Rodham Clinton criticized Barack Obama's praise of the Republican Party and Ronald Reagan - an anathema for many Democrats, particularly union members considered crucial to winning Nevada's Democratic caucuses Saturday."
PAUL STARR WARNS DEMOCRATS THAT they can still blow the election. Luckily for them, they only have to run against the Republicans, or they'd really be in trouble. . . .
Plus, criticism of "stimulus" plans from the Republican Study Committee. I'll just note that there are worse things than recessions, and trying too hard to stop one may be worse than letting the business cycle run its course.
UPDATE: I'm reminded of these 2001 words of wisdom from Andrea See: "This story reads like the government's trying to be comforting about the economic trough we're in. Anyone with half a brain (and did a basic class in economics) would know economies move in cycles. We've had the high point, now it's time for the low. Sucks as it does, it really needs to happen."
Hmm. Blindside? How can it be blindsiding when, as Edsall says, "Republicans are making no secret of their intentions in the general election." I guess if you take advantage of a national-security blind spot, you can still blindside, even without secrecy. None is so blind as he who will not see . . . .
RON BAILEY: "I can remember in the 1980s when all the 'smart' folks were panicked about the Japanese buying up all the best real estate such as the Rockefeller Center. The American sellers laughed all the way to the bank in that deal. Sheesh!"
SOMEWHERE, T.M. LUTAS IS SAYING I TOLD YOU SO: "Iraq's army and police could be ready to take over security in all 18 provinces by the end of this year as the U.S. military moves toward a less prominent role in the country, U.S. officials said on Thursday."
JONAH GOLDBERG IS CURRENTLY #1 on Amazon. I hope he sends a nice thank-you note to all the lefty bloggers who have been savaging him. I don't think he could have done it without them!
One thing that doesn't get talked about enough is that people in Washington are pretty out of touch with the basic economic picture in the United States. Not in the usual, pat, pseudo-populist "oh you're out of touch" sense but in a pretty literal one -- the DC metro area is both quite affluent and economically unusual.
That's right, notwithstanding the D.C. area housing bust. But the difference is even greater than Yglesias suggests. Bad news for the country is usually good news for the DC area, since it tends to promote more government programs and spending, meaning more jobs not so much for government workers as for lobbyists, contractors, and other hangers-on, And journalists and pundits!
In the comments, people talk about different parts of the country and how they're doing. Around Knoxville, things aren't too bad. Houses aren't selling very fast, but in my opinion that's partly because people are asking too much. In a development near me, people are trying to sell houses that they bought a couple of years ago for $300-350K for over $400K. They're actually asking more, in some cases, than the developer is asking for brand-new houses in the neighborhood; the brand-new houses, meanwhile, seem to still be selling. Meanwhile, I see lots of help-wanted signs. Things may slow down, but at the moment it's certainly not visible to the casual observer. In other places -- Cleveland, for example, or Detroit -- it certainly is.
HOW CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE? "Max Sawicky's old blog, now manned by new faces, is apparently no longer specializing in passionately and unapologetically left-wing heterodox economics. Now they just spout random nonsense."
HOWARD KURTZ: "I just got back from Michigan and South Carolina, so I'm prepared to share my insights on how the Republican race is going. . . . Journalists are ticked off because the Republican race is defying our attempts to wrap it into a nice, neat narrative. This is what we do for a living. And if we can't say what's going on, who needs us? You could get just as good a take from your Uncle Harry." Yep!
THE NEW YORK TIMES AND VETERANS: Ralph Peters gives them both barrels. "To a darkly humorous degree, all this reflects the Freudian terrors leftists feel when confronted with men who don't have concave chests. But it goes far beyond that. . . . the Times' feature was an artful example of hate-speech disguised as a public service."
DAN RIEHL: "There was absolutely no reason for Huckabee to bring up the Confederate Flag issue in South Carolina, especially with such a coarse remark destined for a Democrat commercial in the Fall should Huckabee ever get the nod." That seems to be Huckabee's style -- "any weapon to hand" -- with little concern for consistency or consequences.
UPDATE: Bob Krumm says Huckabee might as well be a Democratic plant. "Notice that he’s the only candidate in the Republican field who prefers to pander to identity politics instead of talking about issues." The Republicans' Al Sharpton? Sharpton has better hair . . . .
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, CARY GRANT. In response to some blog posting or other I just bought His Girl Friday. Maybe I'll watch it today, to mark the occasion!
HELEN AND I DID EARLY VOTING, and the turnout is reportedly quite high.
Based on what people were chatting about when I voted, the big turnout in Knoxville was drawn mostly by local races -- big County Government issues here -- and secondarily by people who wanted to vote for Fred Thompson and Barack Obama.
I don't think that's transferable to other elections elsewhere, but we'll see.
DAVE WEIGEL: "If you'd said in January 2007 that Congress would fully fund the Iraq War, that there would be no timelines, and that a pro-war group fronted by Ari Fleischer would humiliate MoveOn... well, you'd be smarter than me." Hard to imagine that anyone could be that smart!
IF Y0U MISSED IT ON XM SATELLITE RADIO, you can listen to this week's PJM Political online now.
MY EARLIER POST ON SCIENCE EDUCATION produced this email from reader Jenn Oates:
Glenn, I teach science at a middle-class high school in Elk Grove, CA—it’s a suburb of Sacramento. Many of my students—entirely too many—come into my 9th grade classroom woefully unprepared for even the most basic rigors of high school science. They do not study. They do not do homework. They do not get the direct connection between how much effort you put into something and the quality of the results. They do not know the difference between an inch and a centimeter. They have trouble with the simplest algebraic calculations (like f=ma). They pay no attention whatsoever (beyond the Al Gore school of bad science) to what is going on in the universe, so much of what I teach has no brain Velcro to stick to. Worst of all? They are embarrassingly incurious. They really don’t care, and if what I do isn’t magically fun, they’re not interested. I work very hard to make what I do interesting and relevant, but they can’t be bothered. My graduate work in science and my efforts thereof mean nothing to them. Not all of them, of course, but enough.
Still, I am expected to turn every student into a science genius-in-the-making. Right. I can do that. Give me better prepared students and perhaps I could.. But it isn’t a Science or Math problem, it’s an attitude problem on the part of the students—their education is excellent, as our district has very high standards. What they make of it is, sadly, too often…not.
It’s quite discouraging. What is the answer? Let me totally revamp the educational system in California and I might be able to begin to address the problem. J
Thanks for keeping things like this in the forefront…
Kids used to be more excited by science. But back then science was doing more visibly exciting things -- moon flights, etc. -- and got more favorable, and modestly more substantive, mass-media coverage. There's still good science coverage now, but it's more of a niche item, I think.
NO ITUNES REQUIRED: LOTS OF TV SHOWS FOR FREE DOWNLOAD, including episode one of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. I actually watched the first two episodes of that show, and I think it's pretty good.
PROFESSOR BAINBRIDGE: Huckabee going off the rails: "Mike Huckabee joins Mitt Romney on my personal list of candidates for whom I would not vote even if the only alternative is Hillary Clinton."
MORE ON THE DELIGHTFUL Mazda Furai. I think it should inspire the RX-9.
IN RESPONSE TO MY EARLIER POST on the tiny ASUS Eee PC, a reader notes this article from the Wall Street Journal, in which Walt Mossberg says it's cool, but (1) it's too small; and (2) he doesn't like Linux. "Too small" is in the eye of the beholder, but it seems just big enough to work to me -- as a reader said earlier, it's big enough for surfing and doing email, which is what most people do. I'd call it a second or third computer for geeks, or an inexpensive computer for a kid, but not a main computer for most people. As for the Linux -- the basic functions are easy enough to use, and most people won't go beyond that. And you can install Windows XP if you want.
I just had one of our IT guys in my office, though, and he was immediately taken with it and said he was going to buy one posthaste. So did one of my colleagues. On the other hand, if you wait a bit they're going to put out a Wimax-enabled version. And if you want some data on my experience with reliability, ruggedness, etc. over a longer term, well, stay tuned. But it does seem to work fine, and it's cute as a bug's ear. For $399 that's not a bad start.
OLD MEDIA HACK ATTACKS BLOGOSPHERE, GETS PRAISE FROM OLD MEDIA: Janet Maslin offers a charitable review of Lee Siegel's Against the Machine, but even she has to include this part:
The vindictiveness and disproportionate influence of the blogosphere is a particularly sore subject. Who is it that “rewrote history, made anonymous accusations, hired and elevated hacks and phonies, ruined reputations at will, and airbrushed suddenly unwanted associates out of documents and photographs”? Mr. Siegel’s immediate answer is Stalin. But he alleges that the new power players of the blogosphere have appropriated similar powers.
Mr. Siegel himself became a great big blog-attack casualty when, in what he wishfully calls “my rollicking misadventure in the online world,” he was caught pseudonymously praising himself on the Web site of The New Republic, where he had been a particularly savage and reckless blogger. One of the improbable virtues of “Against the Machine” is that it presents a rigorously sane, fair and illuminating incarnation of its more often hotheaded author.
If all bloggers had the low standards evidenced by Lee Siegel -- and, more recently, The New Republic -- maybe he'd have a point. But some people just weren't made to blog, and they seem particularly angry at the blogosphere. Meanwhile, I guess we should brace ourselves for an onslaught of Andrew Keen-style young fogies.
MORE ON the state of science education. It's a cliche to say that if our schools thought science was as important as varsity sports, we'd be doing a lot better. But it's a cliche because it's true . . . .
STILL MORE on The New York Times and the "murderous vet" canard. The NYT wouldn't publish this sort of thing about other groups even if it were statistically supportable, for fear of promoting prejudice; in this case, however, they're willing to run with it even when it isn't statistically supported. Which tells us something about their priorities, I guess.
UPDATE: Reader Matt Bodenstedt emails:
Perhaps some enterprising young journalist will endeavor to tell the stories of young men and women whose lives were on the wrong track, joined the military, and can now rightly be considered among America’s finest. I’ll bet they’d find many, many more such stories out of the pool of Iraq/Afghanistan vets than the 121 “murderers.”
Interesting idea. Perhaps it might slip by an editor if they sell it as "charmingly retro."
MORE: Ouch: "The article embraced the hoariest of overwrought clichés - the US combat vet as psychotic killer. But on what evidence? None at all. Indeed, it's impossible to take issue with the statistics cited by reporters Deborah Sontag and Lisette Alvarez - because their article doesn't have any."
THOUGH AT THE TIME IT WAS BLAMED ON TAX-CUTTING REAGANITES, the Minnesota bridge collapse turns out to have been the result of a design error. More on that, and on the plans to replace it, at the link.
And some related thoughts from TigerHawk. Plus, I've had some more extensive thoughts here.
JOHN TIERNEY ON FEAR OF TERRORISM: The problem, of course, is that there's no real way to establish what's a "proper" or "rational" level of fear, because terrorism -- unlike, say, hurricanes or cancer -- isn't the product of extraneous causes but of human agency. You can make a good case that some people fear it too much, or too little, but only at the extremes.
SO I'M WRITING THIS ON THE Asus Eee PC that I mentioned a while back. Unlike the two supertiny computers that I reviewed for Popular Mechanics, this is big enough to type on, and the 7" screen is big enough to read. I wouldn't want to write a book, or even a law review article, on this gadget, but as a (comparatively) inexpensive portable blogging tool it''s not bad.
UPDATE: Reader Laura Blanchard emails:
I bought one after you blogged about it, and it's a dandy road machine. Most folks don't need to do much other than e-mail and note-taking (or in your case blogging) on the road. This thing is small and light enough that I am willing to carry a laptop almost all the time now.
It was the EEE or a Blackberry for me. EEE wins.
Yeah. And it costs 1/5 what my little Sony did, which not only makes it cheaper to buy, but also lets you worry less about losing it or having it stolen.
READER EDWARD CROWLEY EMAILS: "I was in the car, listening to Sean Hannity and he siad that he was going to have the first exclusive interview with Jonah Goldberg about his new book. I missed the interview, because I arrived at my destination, but remembered to email you so you can correct Hannity and tell him he is oh... I don't know.... a little behind the times.... and let him know that you had the first breaking interview with JG- what a month ago. Hannity needs to catch up with the times!!!" Well, he should subscribe to the podcasts, for sure.
UPDATE: Ed Driscoll emails: "Hannity’s interview wasn’t even the first radio interview, since your interview with Jonah aired on XM’s POTUS ’08 channel on Friday January 5th as part of Pajamas’ PJM Political show." Good point!
Three Racine sophomore students were notified on Monday that a celestial body they discovered during a science project had been verified as an asteroid.
The students at Racine's Prairie School will be able to name the asteroid, temporarily identified as "2008 AZ28," in about four years, according to the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Mass., the international authority on known objects in the solar system.
I actually wrote about this very phenomenon in An Army of Davids. Astronomical work that used to require a university is now routinely done by amateurs.
MORE ON THE NEW HAMPSHIRE VOTE, at Ars Technica. Conclusion: "As of today, only sixteen states mandate both a voter-verified paper trail (VVPT) and a random manual audit of election results. The remaining 34 either don't have a mandatory VVPT, don't have mandatory audits, or don't have either. So that's 34 possibilities for a close presidential contest to produce the same blizzard of data, analysis, accusation, and uncertainty that we saw on a very small scale with New Hampshire. Let's hope for a blow-out, landslide victory by one side, because I get tired just thinking about anything closer."
Read the whole thing. And we really need much better security and auditability for voting. And voters.
SO WITH ABOUT 6,000 NEW VOTES since I asked people to hit this week's Pajamas Straw Poll, the big winners are Fred Thompson and Barack Obama. Big losers: John Edwards and Mike Huckabee.
DON SURBER: "OK, this is a survey by Playboy. But I don’t read Playboy, so I got it from Political Wire."
A former congressman and delegate to the United Nations was indicted Wednesday as part of a terrorist fundraising ring that allegedly sent more than $130,000 to an al-Qaida and Taliban supporter who has threatened U.S. and international troops in Afghanistan.
The former Republican congressman from Michigan, Mark Deli Siljander, was charged with money laundering, conspiracy and obstructing justice for allegedly lying about lobbying senators on behalf of an Islamic charity that authorities said was secretly sending funds to terrorists.
A 42-count indictment, unsealed in U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Mo., accuses the Islamic American Relief Agency of paying Siljander $50,000 for the lobbying—money that turned out to be stolen from the U.S. Agency for International Development.
I suspect that there's a good deal more corruption of this type, actually.
BURNING OUT ON AMERICAN IDOL: "If it's good, you're supposed to bond. You're supposed to care as these characters begin their journey into the months long sifting process. They prod you to bond by presenting mini-melodramas that emphasize the contestants' close bonds to their mothers, their sick children, and their horses and kitties." Kinda like the campaign, which a lot of people are burning out on already, too . . . .
REMEMBERING the Subaru SVX. I always thought those were kind of cool. Plus, unlike the WRX, they weren't ugly as a monkey's butt. I mean, the WRX is surprisingly fast, and it handles well, but . . . .
I think that some further information is warranted than the glib one liner you posted in the link. The EADS proposal includes Northrop-Grumman as a major partner in the project. If the contract is awarded to EADS, it would build the airplanes in a new facility in Mobile, Alabama as part of a major capital investment in the U.S. economy with the likelihood that EADS would also expand its operations to include the construction of civilian aircraft as well.
The persons involved in the project from the bottom of the totem pole to nearly the top would be American workers living and paying taxes in the U.S. Boeing is every bit as much a "multi-national" corporation as is EADS. Many prominent American defense specialists and political figures have expressed no concern whatsoever on the issue of EADS building these planes and the only pending issue for the DOD to decide at this point is which proposal is overall most cost efficient and practicable for the U.S. Defense Department. Suggestions about anything else being a problem in this competition is mere paranoid chauvinism. In addition, while the governments that support EADS may not have a pristine record, at least EADS does not have a record of bribery and corruption in U.S. defense contracts such as its main competition has in its past.
In the interests of full disclosure, I am a resident of Mobile.
"Mere paranoid chauvinism" is probably a bit strong.
HEY, DO ME A FAVOR, and if you haven't voted in the Pajamas staw poll -- top of the right sidebar -- this week, please do. I'd like to see how InstaPundit readers view the race now. (Bumped).
UH OH: "Europe's economies show signs of slowing significantly even as inflation rates rise, introducing the word 'stagflation' into the scenarios that some economists are sketching out for 2008." Given that the United States' economy is clearly slowing, if not clearly in recession, we need stronger growth elsewhere to help mitigate the effects. I doubt we'll see that, though.
APPLIANCE-BLOGGING, from the Insta-Wife. I'll just note that I warned her that front-loaders are less reliable, but she liked the looks and the efficiency. Which was a reasonable choice.
THIS SOUNDS LIKE GOOD NEWS: "Two teams of US scientists have demonstrated silicon-based 'thermoelectric' materials that could convert waste heat back into electricity[1,2] - potentially giving a boost to the efficiency of everything from power stations to refrigerators. Until now, efficient thermoelectric materials have used pricier metals such as bismuth or tellurium. Switching over to silicon could have a global impact, allowing large-scale thermoelectric devices to be produced more cheaply." I hope it pans out. (Via Nanodot).
Florida law enforcement officials have been denied access to the office computers of disgraced former Congressman Mark Foley, despite a direct appeal to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi for help in their investigation of sexually explicit messages sent to current and former teenage congressional pages.
Well, it's only fair -- Dennis Hastert did his best to protect William "Freezer Cash" Jefferson, too.
JONATHAN ADLER: "I also think conservatives should pay attention to how they believe respective presidential candidates would deal with the vast federal bureaucracy, large portions of which are staffed with civil servants who are hostile to a conservative governing agenda. Transforming government requires more than being able to give a good speech and make sound policy decisions." He's right -- and though Jonathan is a Thompson guy, this is at the root of my worries about Thompson. He can give good speeches and make sound policy decisions, but his management abilities, as demonstrated in this campaign so far, have been less than stellar.
LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR Vladimir Putin. Made worse, I suppose, by the fact that he's stashed his billions outside Russia. The problem with despotism, I guess, is that it makes it hard to trust your own banking system . . .
IN THE MAIL: Mark Smith's Official Handbook of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. It's a special election edition, but I didn't look to see if there was an explanation of Karl Rove's coded messages to operatives, delivered via the New York Sun's crossword section . . . .
The leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee are calling on President Bush to back away from threats to kill funding for lawmakers’ pet projects.
The pre-emptive warnings from the top Democrat and Republican on the panel are the clearest signs yet that President Bush could face a bipartisan backlash if he uses his executive authority to wipe out the more than $7 billion in earmarks.
Yeah, nobody wants that except the taxpayers . . . . The Republicans, in particular, who are behind this demand are the reason why the GOP lost in 2006, and if Bush listens they'll be the reason why the GOP loses in 2008.
They won't care, though, as long as they are permitted to suck unmolested at the government teat.
FORT DIX SIX UPDATE: "A group of men accused of planning an attack on Fort Dix face additional charges, including attempted murder, after a grand jury concluded there was evidence the men tried to kill uniformed members of the military."
The United States remains the world leader in scientific and technological innovation, but its dominance is threatened by economic development elsewhere, particularly in Asia, the National Science Board said Tuesday in its biennial report on science and engineering.
The United States’ position is especially delicate, the agency said, given its reliance on foreign-born workers to fill technical jobs.
The big problem is that the American workplace doesn't make technical jobs attractive enough. The pay is okay, but less than that of other professionals, like lawyers. And the working conditions for engineers and scientists are generally quite poor -- too much Dilbert, not enough Skunk Works. They act as if there's a positive conspiracy to take all the fun out of it, according several of my friends who work in the area.
UPDATE: Reader Ken Braithwaite emails:
It got much worse after Sarbanes-Oxley. Suddenly we revamped all our processes to include "separation of duties" and other constraints ostensibly to prevent the merest possibility of fraud. But not really of course: really to provide ass-coverage at every level. But this applies as well in all sorts of situations where fraud is not an issue, like developers testing their code. The effect where I work has been disastrous.
People respond to incentives, and incentives were distorted at every level by SOX requirements.
It's a metaphor for the society at large, I fear. And another engineer reader who prefers anonymity writes:
I would just like to say that yes, the pay could be better, and the old, dusty cubicles could be nicer offices, and I do feel like I live in a Dilbert strip. But the worst thing in my opinion is the management at my company, where the rewards and recognition for a job well done are few and far between. I've worked for over twelve years now as an aerospace engineer, and in that time I've had a fair amount of success on various projects, but have never gotten above a three on my performance evals.
I still think I would be bored doing anything else, but sometimes I just want to say screw it all and go use my abilities somewhere that I could make a lot more money. And I'm not alone.
One of my friends noted that engineers tend to do th