IT'S ALL ABOUT BILL: "Just when I thought I was out, the Clintons pull me back into their conjugal psychodrama. . . . Maybe the Boy Who Can’t Help Himself is simply engaging in his usual patterns of humiliating Hillary and lighting an exploding cigar when things are going well."
WELL, GOOD: Pakistan's Islamic Parties Struggle for Support. ""People were asking for clean water, and they didn't get it. We were very hopeful. But the mullahs did nothing for us." No surprise there.
I DON'T KNOW THIS BLOG, and can't vouch for it myself. But if this story about Huckabee's speaking fees pans out, it seems that it's likely to be pretty damaging. I've got no problem with taking speaking fees from stem-cell research companies -- but it contradicts Huckabee's positions, doesn't it?
UPDATE: More from the Globe: "He opposes embryonic stem-cell research, but this year accepted a fat speaking fee from drugmaker Novo Nordisk, which conducts embryonic stem-cell research." (Via John Stephenson, who has more).
ANOTHER UPDATE: Shades of Jim Wright? Well, possibly. Reader Bill Nelson sends a link to this report that Novo Nordisk -- the stem-cell company -- distributed 35,000 copies of Huckabee's book, translated into Spanish, for free. No word what Huckabee was paid; possibly nothing, possibly a lot. No doubt people will be asking the campaign about it.
I MENTIONED BOB ZUBRIN'S Energy Victory earlier -- a reader emails that he'll be on C-SPAN2 tonight starting about 7 pm Eastern. And here's a bit on Zubrin's book from Alan Boyle. And here's a review from Cliff May.
Meanwhile, although I think that corn-based ethanol is a bad deal, that doesn't mean that all biofuels are bad. For example, cellulosic ethanol looks promising. And Zubrin told me a while back that you can make methanol out of kudzu, which will certainly appeal to folks in my neck of the woods.
HUFFINGTON POST:Giuliani's Exoneration Over Expense Scandal Falls On Deaf Ears. "Over the past several weeks, Rudy Giuliani's presidential aspirations have been weighed down by allegations that he hid trip expenses to see then-mistress Judith Nathan by billing them to obscure city agencies. Now, however, a new review of records has partially exonerated Giuliani for what was widely perceived to be a cover-up. And conservatives and even impartial observers are bemoaning that the scandal received far more attention compared to the revelations of innocence. "
I dunno, is he a politician? Plus, thoughts on experience.
A LOOK AT lawfare in Israel. "While the soldiers and general public view the war as a failure, one sector of Israeli society sees the war as a great triumph. For Israel's legal establishment, the war was a great victory. It was a war in which its members asserted their dominance over Israel's political and military leadership. . . . Given the contrast between Mandelblit's and Mazuz's view of the war as a triumph and the public's view of the war as a failure, it is worth considering whether there is a connection between the unprecedented 'lawyerization' of the war in Lebanon and the fact that Israel lost the war." Lawyers are fine in their place. Which has its limits. Overlawyering war is likely to lead, over time, to the position that all laws of war are productive of defeat and the product of self-interested behavior by special interests. That is not a desirable outcome.
LEGAL HARASSMENT: Department of Sartorial Intimidation. The intimidation is entirely intentional. I'd like to see some turnabout on issues like this.
GOOD NEWS FOR PROCRASTINATORS: Reader Dean Knight emailed yesterday that Amazon was offering shipping as late as Sunday afternoon for Amazon Prime members with delivery on Monday. I didn't get the email that he got, but I discovered that this shipping schedule on Amazon only shows the Saturday 4 pm cutoff unless you're logged in, but then, if you're an Amazon Prime member, it shows the Sunday 2 pm (Eastern) deadline instead. So you're not out of luck yet, though I wouldn't wait until the last minute for anything that really matters. No system is perfect, and this is pretty late.
IN THE CHRISTMAS SPIRIT! "A woman stabbed her husband with a kitchen knife following an argument that began when she accused him of opening a Christmas present early, authorities said Friday."
UPDATE: The more I think about it, the more I like the idea of going out and interviewing people mentioned in questionable media accounts. And the less I think some "journalists" will be pleased with the results.
ANOTHER UPDATE: A reader says that The Politico missed the real story -- Thompson's refusal to pander:
AKD: What will you do for the farmers of Bremer County?
FT: (laughs)
AKD: You knew this was coming, right?
FT: I would continue to enjoy the fruits of their labor. I’ve been looking all over Iowa for a bad steak and I can’t find it. Been trying my best. It’s not a matter of what I would do for the farmers. Farmers are not looking for a president to hand them something. Farmers want fair treatment and a chance to prosper in a free economy and that’s what I would help ensure. There’s a lot of programs we’ve got out there, some of which are good programs, some of which are not. And I think that we need to work our way through that and make sure we’re doing what’s good for the country, not just the farmers, not just the people of Iowa, not just the people of Tennessee. But good for the country. A sound policy that makes sense. I think there’s a lot more that we could do for the working farmer in terms of ecological programs and environmental programs - land conservation, soil conservation - that would be fair and it would be beneficial to the nation and to Iowa and to our country. We’re going to have to phase out the corporate welfare system we’ve got, however. There are extremely rich people living in skyscrapers in Manhattan that are receiving subsidy payments. I think that’s wrong. I’d put a stop to that if it was within my power. That still continues in this latest Farm Bill and it’s not right. There ought to be a cutoff at some level and it’s not right ot have millionaires receiving farm subsidies.
Non-pandering in Iowa? There's a man-bites dog story. This seems like it should have been bigger news.
WHEN DID THE FRENCH BECOME a bunch of prudes? I blame Chirac. Plus, a surprise appearance by Cruella de Ville.
UPDATE: Maybe it is. I've gotten a lot of emails like this one from Evan Maxwell:
I doubted, then I tried and damn, it works.
I've had sinus infections at least once a year for more than a decade. I started the first of three surgeries to correct the problem but quit after one, once I learned the process was marginally successful for most folks and often needed to be repeated every three or four years. So I treated with antibiotics and had a low-grade problem most of the time.
Then my old college roommate, a vet, prescribed NeilMed, which is kind of a Neti pot on steroids, using a plastic bottle to boost the pressure. I haven't had a sinus outbreak in almost two years and my breathing generally is better.
Once a day seems to work but I think you can use the system more often if you want.
Yogis are no fools, even if they dress funny sometimes.
That's true.
MORE: An email from a "longtime reader who is an ENT doc." Click "read more" to read it.
Longtimer reader who is an ENT doc that cares, and at times operates, on patients with sinus disease.
I love saline in the nose in any form. I have a pile of Neilmed starter packs that I give out to my sinus patients. At conferences we discuss frequency, tonicity and volume of the saline, efficacy is established. The primary function of your nose is to warm and humidify air for your lungs. The cold, dry air of winter may be too much for your nose to handle. Saline assists your nose by adding moisture and rinsing thickened secretions. (This is also helpful for colds and seasonal allergies-"the solution to pollution is dilution"). Anyone with any nose compaint leaves my office with a recommendation for humidity (especially in the bedroom) and sailine in some form (usually an OTC spray eg Ocean, Ayr or the pharmacy knockoff if there is no significant sinus disease).
The flipside, however, is the tremendous overdiagnosis of "sinusitis" and sinus headaches. There was a study offering the first 100 patients with sinus headaches (self or physician diagnosed) free treatment. 3 had sinus disease. The rest had some viariant of migraine or tension headache. This jibes with my experience of treating folks 'fed up' this their chronic sinusitis. It also explains why something as simple as saline can work where antibiotics fail. "Sinus" is a wastebasket term that can mean headaches, congestion, post nasal drip, nasal obstruction, allergies, or real sinus disase (with or without polyps). Multiple issues with no one size fits all treatment.
Obviously every case is different and this oversimplifies a complex problem. But saline is a win-win. It often helps and very rarely does any harm.
Good to know. And yeah, I thought my migraines were sinus headaches for years.
ABU MUQAWAMA ON the exodus of the captains: "There is so much that is absolutely %$#@ed in the way the U.S. Army is handling its young officers that it might take decades to fix this." Somebody should start.
UPDATE: A lengthy email from reader Patrick Walsh. Click "read more" to read it.
LATER: A couple of responses to Walsh, also after the jump.
I was commissioned in 1979, you know, back when only losers joined the Army (I attended college on an academic scholarship, lettered in crew for 4 years and my boat made the finals of the Dad Vails in my senior year, I graduated Magna Cum Laude, with General College Honors; I was accepted at three Law Schools). I retired in 1996. Periodically every 5 or 7 years during my career there would be a spike in junior officers leaving the service...they were always described as the best and brightest. You know, leaving just us losers, careerists and bureaucrats behind. Yet in 1991 our Army smoked the Iraqis in something like 100 hours. 5 Years after I left the service our Army had forces on the ground in Afghanistan within two or three weeks after 9/11 and in the last 6 years have done more with less and with fewer casualties (civilian and military) than any force in history in any comparable situation, at least that I can think of. I am pretty proud of the Army I and the other losers helped build. I watched guys that I taught as a tactics instructor appear on TV as battalion commanders. Friends of mine are senior officers. I am proud of them. I gotta think there are a lotta cubicle dwellers in their 40's and 50's facing their second company takeover wishing they had stayed in.
Now here is a little secret...I always intended to get out of the Army after I left company command, which was in my 6th year of service. But, there was always one more neat thing to do and before I know it I was in for a career. During that time I watched a lot of other guys get out. Many of them were good guys but very few were the best and brightest. A lot of guys left as soon as their initial obligations were up because, like me, they never intended to make the Army a career...they wanted to do their service and then move on. Some others left because they felt that the Army didn't properly recognize just how great a favor they were doing the nation by their service. Some other left because being in the service is just tough, and there are usually a few years in everyone's career that just are not fun. Others left because while they might have good to excellent resume's they got themselves into some trouble that killed their career...a DUI maybe, or they were insubordinate or lied, or they slept with someone else's wife or someone in their chain of command. That stuff doesn't necessarily show up in the statistics...the officer gets a less than outstanding Officer Evaluation Report or a Letter of Reprimand and they know their career is over and they resign. Just because someone graduated from West Point or was Distinguished Military Graduate in ROTC and they have all the scare badges (Airborne, Ranger, CIB, Pathfinder etc) doesn't mean they are the "best and brightest" - EVERY Infantry Officer has the scare badges.
I don't know whether there is a real problem or not but I wouldn't make my decision on a one or two year spike, or a few articles, some written by folks with an axe to grind and some written by the misinformed.
And yes, sometimes the personnel system does do some really screwy things and promotion boards make some strange decisions...but in general, it is pretty good for a large organization.
Large organizations specialize in strange decisions.
MORE: Another reader emails:
I read Patrick Walsh's letter and even though I was a Non-Commissioned Officer (I retired in 2006 after 30 years, two wars, and a so-called "peace-keeping mission) I can relate to many of the issues he discussed. It's for no small reason that many young Captains start receiving job offers from Corporate head-hunters. They are well aware of the fork in the road which every Officer and NCO reaches at a certain point in their career. For NCOs, it's usually past the 10 year mark. At that that point, you're considered a "career Soldier". For Officers, it's usually the rank of Major. I stayed in for many reasons (it wasn't 'for the money', believe me) and made it to Sergeant First Class in spite of some of the infractions described in his e-mail. I was from the "old school Army" where you weren't considered a good Soldier unless you had at least one Article 15. I know many Command Sergeant Majors who accumulated a few of them. My personal mistakes never affected my dedication to my Army or my country, but I digress.
In any case, he makes a very good point about the fact that the Army does not do well enough to retain good, young leaders. Those of us who stayed for the long haul had to think beyond the bureaucratic bullshit and focus on taking care of our troops and "Duty, Honor, Country".
SFC Cheryl McElroy
US ARMY (RET)
And a response to Patrick Walsh from a reader who's still serving, and requests anonymity:
Several years ago, the senior leadership was blaming "the new generation" of officers for the high numbers exiting the Army. They kept saying we weren't dedicated like them and we didn't have the same view of service. When I came in the Army in '86 the Army was a different organization. We trained hard and partied hard. After the draw down in the early 90s, only the cut throat officers survived. Zero defects was the rule of the day. The Army was no longer fun. Any mistake was the end of your entire chain of command's career. No drinking, no risk taking, etc. Bottom line, these leaders had their fun and then took it away from my generation of officers. In my unit, I was the first officer to go to the Officer Advanced Course in two years. Every single young officer that was in front of me got out. Not all of them were the "best and brightest" but then not every officer is -- however our best and brightest Captain got out. He ended up working on Wall Street.
There is something peculiar to the problem in the Army. We have raised a generation of senior officers that don’t work well with others. I was stationed at a Navy base working at a Joint assignment. There were five Army guys (three officers and two senior enlisted). After about six months, the entire cadre wanted to shoot the two LTC’s on the Army staff. Why? They wanted to be the heroes at work and wouldn’t share information with the rest of the staff. At one point, there was open revolt at a training meeting when the LTC’s informed us that all the work we had done in the past two weeks was pointless because they had changed the entire plan weeks ago and didn’t tell us. Majors and Captains were yelling at them. It was interesting for me because I was used to this kind of leadership and the feedback I got from the Navy, Marines, and Air Force personnel is that they had never seen anything like it.
The article that LTC Walsh is poo-pooing is dead on. In fact, we addressed this article in my class at CGSC this past Thursday and everyone in the room agreed with it, including the retired officers on staff.
I'm just glad people are paying attention.
STILL MORE: Another reader email:
Having read the Washington Monthly article in question and some of the comments you have published, I feel compelled to send a few thoughts on the subject.
In 1970, I became one of the Regular Army Captains who left the service, in my case after five years of active duty. I had served in Vietnam and Germany and other places and had seen the full range of senior officers, from tyrants to secular saints. In Vietnam, some of these individuals perfumed marvelously, and others made errors of judgment which resulted in needless casualties. When I unburdened my 27-year old heart on these matters to a very savvy Major, his very adult response was "What the hell did you expect , anyway?" He reminded me that I had made an extensive study of American military history, and asked me if I could recall a single American military campaign that had not featured episodes of stupidity, self-serving actions, or near criminal neglect by a few American commanders. We briefly discussed five or six wars and it was quite easy to grasp his point. The fact is that the Army is made up of human beings of widely varying capabilities. As with any imperfect institution (I could not name a perfect one, by the way) sometimes the wrong people will be promoted and some of the best will wither due to just plain bad luck. I could go through a Rogue's Gallery of American Generals who were unfit for their commands, to include many revered names in the Second World War, but I see no point, as any student of military history could do the same thing without much effort.
My reasons for leaving the active Army were personal in nature, having to due with stresses on my family that I could not resolve in the active Army. Thus, I can readily empathize with the family issues outlined in the Washington monthly article. Also, I, like any Captain of my age and experience, could have filled any number of newspaper columns with anecdotal stories of this Colonel or that General who was a blockhead and who was nonetheless promoted. This made me no different than thousands of other junior officers dating back to 1776 and the Continental Army.
After leaving the Army, I completed an MBA and law degree and prospered in the investment business. After thirty years in two firms, having spent my last eight years as President of one of them, I could easily provide a series of anecdotes about successful Wall Street people of my acquaintance who were despicable, stupid, greedy, or all three and who still made large fortunes due to perseverance, dumb luck or family connections. Once again, what would be the point of recounting these tales as they merely prove that Wall Street too is an imperfect institution.
Sadly, many officers who leave the service came into it with an idealistic portrait of the Army, only to be disappointed when they learned that some of their idols had clay feet. Based on the Washington Monthly interviews and the naive statements which some of the law student officers made about their expectations in the legal and financial worlds, I fear they will face disappointment yet again. There are few of my successful lawyer friends who over the years have not periodically cursed the profession they chose, when they were buried in depositions or contracts, or were suffering under the idiotic leadership of a well-positioned but foolish Managing Partner.
Rick Atkinson, author of "The Day of Battle" once commented that the Army is a living organism that absorbs those who enter it, and which somehow rejuvenates itself even when it has sustained serious blows. It will do so in the coming years, despite the regrettable loss of many talented junior officers.
When I left active duty in 1970, many of my friends also left, but many remained on duty through the terrible 1970s; then, they rebuilt the magnificent force which defeated Iraq in 1991. Who were the best and who were the brightest; those who left or those who stayed? There is no answer, for all these officers made choices and then lived with them. Those who had the determination and, importantly, a bit of good luck, prospered in the Army or in civilian life. Some, unlucky or unable to adapt to changing conditions, fell by the wayside. It is ever thus.
I was able to remain in the Army Reserve, retiring as Colonel after 30 years of total service; therefore, I consider myself most fortunate to have had, as it were, the best of both worlds.
To those officers who are leaving, I say God Bless you and thank you for your service in hard times. May your new efforts bring you prosperity and happiness. To those who remain, I say a special thank you, for you are the ones who will continue in the vital role as defenders of the nation. I have three grandchildren now, living in New York and Chicago and thus sitting on large bulls-eyes for the terrorists who would kill us all it they had the opportunity. I can do nothing to protect them anymore, so I thank you for doing the job for me. When the going is very hard, as it so often is in the Army, please think of two little girls in New York and a baby boy in Chicago, and know that their grandfather is ever grateful and wishes you Godspeed.
Lawrence R. Stack
Colonel, AUS (Ret.)
Lake Forest, Illinois
Well, fine. But my dad marched with Martin Luther King, too -- not that he was famous enough for anyone to notice -- but I didn't see it, and I never claimed I did. Romney seems to have suffered from politicians' disease, where it's not enough to report that something happened, you have to report it in a way that puts you in the story. Trouble is, he wasn't in the story. Is that a big deal? Not really, I guess. But it was an unforced error at a crucial time and it underscores the feeling a lot of people have that Romney's just a bit too airbrushed to be true.
This past week, Congress passed an omnibus spending bill that will soon be presented for your signature. While it is consistent with the total budget targets your administration has set, the 3,417 pages of the bill and associated reports are bloated by more than 9,000 earmarks which were subjected to little or no review during the scant 24 hours between the publishing of the bill text and the House voting to pass it. When combined with the more than 2,000 earmarks in the Defense Appropriations Bill this Congress has churned out over 11,000 earmarks this year. The vast majority of these earmarks do not even appear in the legislative text, but rather are buried in the committee reports that accompany the bill, further removing them from proper review and scrutiny. While the total number of earmarks is down compared to record highs and there is increased transparency, there are still far too many to be effectively vetted.
The rushed way in which Congress passed the omnibus - one of the largest pieces of legislation ever considered - made a mockery of our legislative process, and Congress itself bears the responsibility and shame for that. But you have the power to send a message both to Congress and the American people that the waste and corrupting influence of earmarks will not be tolerated. A December 18 legal analysis by the Congressional Research Service concluded that "because the language of committee reports do not meet the procedural requirements of Article I of the Constitution -- specifically, bicameralism and presentment - they are not laws and, therefore, are not legally binding on executive agencies... Given both the implied legal and constitutional authority as well as the long-standing accepted process of Presidents, it appears that a President can, if he so chooses, issue an executive order with respect to earmarks contained solely in committee reports and not in any way incorporated into the legislative text."
On December 20, you stated that you were "instructing the budget director to review options for dealing with the wasteful spending in the omnibus bill." We applaud you for this leadership, and ask that you follow through by issuing an executive order formally directing all Federal agencies to ignore non-legislative earmarks tucked into committee reports and statements of managers. Such an action is within your Constitutional powers, and would strike a blow for fiscal responsibility now while setting a valuable precedent for the future.
SOME THOUGHTS ON RELIGION IN PUBLIC LIFE that Mike Huckabee might have profited from.
OKAY, I'M A BIG FAN OF COMPACT FLUORESCENT BULBS -- and the Kossacks are still way behind the Insta-readers.
But the gradual ban on incandescent bulbs in the new energy bill is just asinine: "Incandescent light bulbs will begin to be phased out in 2012, with a complete ban finalized in 2014. Manufacturers will be forced to switch to compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs, which can cost more than six times as much as the common incandescent bulb."
Let's show we're serious about energy conservation, by forcing members of Congress to fly commercial instead of on government executive jets. . . .
VIDEO: Fred Thompson responds to The Politico on the hat story. "Just remember...we don't raise our hands when we're told to, and we don't wear any hats, unless they're our own." Bob Owens observes that Thompson's video is funny, but The Politico's stonewalling is not. The story's also leaking out into the journalism press.
BACK TO THE FUTURE IN EUROPE: "In fact, the planned ratification of the Lisbon Treaty smacks of old Europe - when the ruling elite got its way regardless of the wishes of the people over whom it ruled." Yes, much of the E.U. project has seemed to me like an effort to bring back the transnational aristocracy that ran Europe before World War I. And that certainly worked out well . . . .
LIMBAUGH GOES AFTER HUCKABEE: I told you attacking him was a bad idea. That would be like Hillary going after Oprah.
UPDATE: Ouch: "I believe this Rush-bashing incident may turn out to be Huckabee’s Howard Dean scream moment."
ANOTHER UPDATE: Huckabee's Chip Saltsman lays on the love for Limbaugh: "We have nothing but respect for Rush Limbaugh and know that he's a big part of the conservative movement in this country. That's one person's opinion in DC, but it doesn't represent the view of the Huckabee campaign. I can only hope we'll get a chance to talk to Rush and make sure that he knows that's not coming from us."
ANN ALTHOUSE on Nickelodeon, Jamie Lynn Spears, and Zoey 101.
THE AMAZON MAILBOTS ARE REMINDING ME that you can still order as late as 4 pm eastern time tomorrow and get it by Christmas Eve, God and UPS willing. I've had good luck -- only one present still hasn't arrived, and it'll probably get here -- but if I were planning on having stuff show up Christmas Eve I'd want to have a backup plan, just in case . . . .
Or there's always a gift certificate. They email those.
UPDATE: Hey, maybe they're right to point this out: "35 million Americans haven't started Christmas shopping yet. Thank God He created Fed Ex on the 8th day. " And it arrived the morning of the 9th! Absolutely, positively!
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Dean Knight emails: "Glen, don't know about you, but I got a bot from Amazon this morning saying, as a Prime customer, I have until 12 Noon Pacific time Sunday to order and get it Christmas Eve. Guess you don't order enough from them. Ha!" I feel sorry for anyone who orders more than I do.
MICKEY KAUS: "Jerry Skurnick has suggested that the electorate is splitting into two diverging parts--people who follow politics and people who don't--with the people who follow politics much better informed than they were before (thanks to cable, web, etc.) and the people who don't follow politics less well informed (they used to get at least some information from Walter Cronkite). That certainly rings true to me. . . . But there's a second way to divide the electorate that asks how the voters inform themselves. Do they rely on the traditional Mainstream Media (MSM), or do they get their political information from the Web, from cable news, from the tabloids, etc. This division may have once seemed unimportant, but it doesn't anymore."
A FRED THOMPSON ENDORSEMENT from Bob Krumm. "Fred Thompson won. That didn’t surprise me. What I didn’t suspect was how well John McCain placed according to my analytical estimation."
I just got a phone call — unprompted — from Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico, a Democratic candidate for president, blasting Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for saying she would withdraw nearly all American troops from Iraq within a year of beginning redeployment.
“Senator Clinton’s comments are a stunning flip-flop — she’s been saying she would keep troops in Iraq for five years, until 2013, and now she comes up with an inconsistent, incredible turnaround,” Mr. Richardson said.
Richardson must think that his shot at being Hillary's running mate -- or, rather, of Hillary being in a position to have a running mate -- is looking iffy. He's been quite gentle with her up to now.
AND HE EARNED EVERY PENNY: "Russian president Vladimir Putin, whose alleged accumulated wealth of $40bn would make him Europe's richest man."
HOMELAND SECURITY IS A (SOMETIMES CRUEL) JOKE -- and Tom Maguire notes that it's been that way since before Andrew Sullivan and Matt Yglesias started to pay attention.
I actually remember something like that happening to an English graduate student and his family who lived across the street from us at Holden Green when I was a kid.
Plus, this crucial distinction: "In fascism, you're persecuted because of who you are and who your parents were. In an American airport, you're persecuted because you're there."
GPS UDPATE: So the GPS that I ordered -- this one -- showed up the other day. I've had it on the dash for a couple of days, just to see how it works. Pretty well. The maps are clear and so far seem entirely accurate. The routing doesn't always choose my regular routes from place to place -- which may be a flaw in the device but is more likely a flaw in my regular routes -- and when I was stuck in traffic on Kingston Pike it found me a shortcut through a subdivision that I didn't realize connected through to another main road. The voice directions are clear and come in plenty of time to make turns. It's easy to use -- I haven't even looked at the manual, which, lamely, but typically these days is on a CD not in a print version. I think I'm glad that I sprung for the wider screen model -- I'm sure that the cheaper nuvi 350 is plenty good, as lots of readers enthusiastically endorsed it -- but the big screen does seem exceptionally clear. Haven't really had a chance to test out the traffic receiver yet.
And apparently I'm riding a trend as sales of GPS devices are way up this season. Well, they've gotten cheap enough, and good enough, that even the people who were holding back are starting to buy them. That's me!
HOW TO DRAW TRAFFIC AND COMMENTERS OUT OF THE WOODWORK: Do what Megan McArdle has done, and repeatedly criticize Ron Paul on the gold standard.
UPDATE: I think they'll soon abandon her for Stephen Green.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Charles Johnson emails: "If you really want to stir up the Paulians, just post a picture of him with Don Black of Stormfront."
WEBLOGS VS. THE NEW YORK TIMES: Dave Winer bet on Weblogs and -- sort of -- wins. But Rogers Cadenhead says that both lost.
THEY TOLD ME THAT IF GEORGE W. BUSH WERE RE-ELECTED, sadistic minions of the state would torture those who got out of line with cruel electric shocks. And they were right!
A state report identifies multiple failures by staff members of a group home that allowed two emotionally disturbed teenagers to be given dozens of electrical shocks at the direction of a caller posing as a supervisor.
more stories like this
The report says none of the six staff members in a Stoughton residence run by the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center on the night of Aug. 26 acted to stop the harrowing events for three hours, despite ample reasons to doubt the validity of the caller's instructions to wake the boys in the middle of the night and administer painful shock treatments, at times while their arms and legs were bound.
I blame Dick Cheney and the neocons.
OH, GOOD, MORE NANNY-STATERS IN THE RACE: Bloomberg & Hagel talking about a third-party run? Hagel's got no GOP support, and Bloomberg is just Rudy Giuliani without Rudy's virtues. I can't imagine that they'd pull many Republican votes -- my guess is they'd hurt the Democrats more, but I think that they're unlikely to catch fire with very many people regardless, as neither has much in the way of charisma.
UPDATE: TigerHawk: "Good news for the Republicans, I would say. In particular, the regular running of advertisements with Hagel's profoundly incorrect predictions about 'the surge' ('This is a dangerously wrong-headed strategy that will drive America deeper into an unwinnable swamp at a great cost... We cannot escape the reality that there will be no military solution in Iraq') should both interdict Republican defections to Bloomberg and promote Democratic ones."
UPDATE: Reader M. Simon says he can't find any confirmation from Toshiba, and suggests that this is a hoax. Too bad, if so.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Dave Moelling emails: "The Toshiba mini reactor is for real. They’ve been having some discussions with remote towns in Alaska. It’s an updated version of the old Army mobile reactors from the 1950’s that were used in Greenland and Antarctica. The idea is to have a very stable, safe plant with a very long life without refueling. The real market is future industrial applications."
And reader Thomas Wunderlin of Arctic Green Energy writes: "This is decidedly not a hoax. The first installation is slated for Alaska. Here are a couple of links:" Link 1,Link 2.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Matt Szekely sends this 2005 New York Times report.
ANN ALTHOUSE ON THE NEW HILLARY AD: "Isn't this like when you get presents from family members and you know they charged it on your credit card?"
HOWARD KURTZ: "Just back from Iowa, and I've got a theory about why Hillary Clinton has been having a difficult time. It's because she is the issue." Plus, an Al Gore / Hillary comparison.
THE JAMIE LYNN SPEARS STORY occasions a look at statutory rape law. I agree that the laws in that area offer great potential for injustice.
THE MUSLIM new year has come in with a bang. On the eve of the high holiday of Eid Al-Adha, explosions abound. Outside Beirut a car bomb kills four. A double-blast in Quetta, Pakistan, destroys eight lives. Twin suicide bombings in Iraq's Diyala Province murder 26, including six women and children. Two bombers in Algiers, one a grandfather, claim over 35 victims.
more stories like this
This year-end killing spree - whose victims were nearly all Muslim - has again revealed a profound failure to stop violent extremism across the Muslim world. The international community, increasingly numb to a steady tide of slaughter in Muslim lands, has little to say. Muslim leaders offer a ritual disclaimer that the radicals don't represent Islam - a "religion of peace" - and then retreat into silence.
We have failed to offer a robust response to the brutal wave of human sacrifice. This failure has allowed extremists to garner headlines and define the agenda without meeting an equally passionate response from the moderate center. It is long past time to mount a vigorous campaign against the cult of death and reaffirm a culture of life.
An essential first step is admitting we have a problem.
Read the whole thing. Thanks to reader Jina Hassan for the link.
DOESN'T SOUND LIKE WE'RE HEADING FOR A RECESSION: "Gross domestic product rose at an unrevised 4.9% annual rate July through September, quicker than its solid, 3.8% performance in the second quarter, the Commerce Department said Thursday."
THE TUNGUSKA EXPLOSION: An asteroid strike, according to Sandia, and by a smaller asteroid than had previously been thought possible. “That such a small object can do this kind of destruction suggests that smaller asteroids are something to consider. Their smaller size indicates such collisions are not as improbable as we had believed.”
GOOD TIMING: "Hillary Rodham Clinton's youngest sibling is a deadbeat dad who owes tens of thousands of dollars in child support to his politically connected ex, The Post has learned." Just what Hillary needs. Is it a plant?
As Mickey Kaus says, sometimes a story is just a story. But why didn't they get this cleaned up? It seems to me that it would be worth tens of thousands to the campaign to keep this story out of the news. (Via JWF).
I don't want to overdo this. I think it's perfectly fine to be worried about Huckabee's vagueness, and his unpreparedness. I'm worried about these things too, which is a big reason why I can't say I'd vote for him (though honestly, any Republican who finds himself worked up over Huckabee's lack of knowledge about foreign affairs, say, should ask himself if he felt the same way about Gov. Bush in 1999 and 2000, and if not, why not). Still, it's hard to shake the belief that the real problem with Mike Huckabee, as far as the establishment is concerned, is that he's not clubbable.
I'd say just the opposite. I think that Huckabee has gotten a lot of mileage out of being a likable guy. I liked him a lot too when we talked to him. Now that he's moved up in the polls, people are starting to give him the kind of scrutiny that the Giulianis and McCains have been getting all along, and his positions aren't holding up well. As for why people didn't feel that way about Bush in 1999, that's easy -- it was because America was still taking a holiday from history, and foreign affairs and national security didn't seem that important. Maybe we've learned something since then. Had we looked at things in 2000 as we do now, they might have turned out differently.
MEGAN MCARDLE: "Ron Paul's supporters see the might of his common sense slashing through the doubletalk of the financial solons. I see a really, really smart economist responding to Ron Paul the same way you react to Cousin Mildred when she corners you after Christmas dinner to complain about the flouridation of the water supply."
LAWBLOG STAGNATION? Orin Kerr observes: "In the 2003-06 period, it looked like the blawgosphere -- the part of the blogworld devoted to law blogs -- was expanding rapidly and becoming more and more important. As 2007 comes to an end, however, I think we can see a very different picture for 2007. For the most part this was a year of little growth or even a slight decline among law blogs."
Only so many people are interested in legal matters. Though it seems to me that I've been doing somewhat more law-blogging in the past year than in previous years.
December 19, 2007
AFGHANISTAN: "The U.S. is upset that NATO countries have failed to deliver three infantry battalions, 3,000 trainers and 20 transport and attack helicopters they promised to send."
AN IRAQ TURNAROUND: "An astonishing turnaround occurred in the Senate on Tuesday: 70 senators voted to fund the Iraq war with a fresh $70 billion and no strings attached. Think about this a moment. Last winter, after Democrats captured the Senate and House, it seemed likely they'd succeed in limiting or ending the Iraq war, probably by setting a firm timetable for withdrawal of American troops. After all, both President Bush and the war itself were highly unpopular. The Democratic triumph in the election made that clear, even to those who doubted opinion polls. And Democrats made the anti-Iraq crusade their top priority in the new Congress. Now, the 70-vote approval of the war by the Senate represents the breathtaking dimension of their failure."
MORE: A big-picture roundup on questionable reporting. (Bumped).
MARK LEVIN: "Mike Huckabee is now becoming a very divisive figure in the Republican party. It's not his faith or his Merry Christmas commercial that many conservatives question (I certainly don't), but it's his record as governor and his stated positions on the war, foreign policy generally, taxes, spending, and illegal aliens."
HOLLYWOOD AT WAR: "The cluelessness on display here is sad. On the other hand, it might have been their way of preparing our correspondent for life on the home front." I doubt it, though, since hardly anyone on the home front actually saw Rendition. No, really: "(Ninth place, with a shockingly bad $4.1 mil). The French have a word for a movie like that, PopWatchers, it's called une bombe."
IN OUR PODCAST INTERVIEW EARLIER THIS WEEK, John McCain delivered a lot of I Told You Sos. This YouTube video from 2000 suggests that he might add his assessment of Time Man of the Year Vladimir Putin to that list.
I have my problems with McCain on domestic policy issues, but on national security and foreign policy he's good, and this video makes you wonder how he would have done had he won in 2000. The other striking thing about this video, though, is how much younger both McCain and Bush look. Well, the years since haven't been easy ones.
I just read your "Keep It Quiet" article on TCS Daily. I wanted to buy a couple of backup power supplies a few months ago, did some research, and was amazed to find that the Geek Squad supplies from Best Buy actually (gasp!) have a button that lets you turn off the ultra-annoying beeper. If it's daytime (and the room lights aren't on) and my power goes off, I'd never know it except for the little 'click' the power supplies make as the relays engage. Very nice.
I'll buy some as soon as the Christmas traffic disperses.
Plus, a look at the ever-shifting reasons for a "disappointing" shopping season. I'm playing it safe and blaming Dick Cheney.
BETTER BATTERIES WITH NANOWIRES: "'It's not a small improvement,' Cui said. 'It's a revolutionary development.'"
GIULIANI ON EARMARKS. Glad to see this becoming a campaign issue.
JOHN LEO: "It is slowly dawning on the public that fake hate crimes, like the one just perpetrated by Princeton student Francisco Nava, are quite common on college campuses."
A SURPRISING PRESIDENTIAL ENDORSEMENT, from Frank J. Fleming. "I should note, though, that the most important factor in IMAO endorsing Fred Thompson is that I already have an awesome t-shirt designed for him which will pretty much go to waste if he isn't the nominee. "
Read the whole thing. The Thompson campaign emails: "Frank J’s reasoning is impeccable."
But there are multiple crosses in the background at the end of this Ron Paul Christmas message. Well, sort of.
REMEMBERING THE Citroen CX. A guy who lived up the street from my dad had one, and I thought it was cool until it caught fire one day and burned to a cinder.
The Kyoto treaty was agreed upon in late 1997 and countries started signing and ratifying it in 1998. A list of countries and their carbon dioxide emissions due to consumption of fossil fuels is available from the U.S. government. If we look at that data and compare 2004 (latest year for which data is available) to 1997 (last year before the Kyoto treaty was signed), we find the following.
* Emissions worldwide increased 18.0%.
* Emissions from countries that signed the treaty increased 21.1%.
* Emissions from non-signers increased 10.0%.
* Emissions from the U.S. increased 6.6%.
In fact, emissions from the U.S. grew slower than those of over 75% of the countries that signed Kyoto.
They told me that if George W. Bush were elected, the United States would lag behind the rest of the world on greenhouse gases And they were right!
U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels decreased by 1.3 percent in 2006, from 5,955 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (MMTCO2) in 2005 to 5,877 MMTCO2 in 2006, according to preliminary estimates recently released by the Energy Information Administration (EIA).
The economy, as measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP), grew by 3.3 percent and energy demand fell by 0.9 percent indicating that energy intensity (energy use per unit of GDP) fell by 4.2 percent. Carbon dioxide intensity (CO2 emission per unit of GDP) fell by 4.5 percent.
The market seems to be doing what Kyoto hasn't. (Somewhat related item here).
THE WAR AGAINST SCIENCE: ""As reported by Science magazine, Congress has cut science funding increases for fiscal year 2008. This comes in spite of the earlier announced presidential initiative to increase funding for basic research to improve the future economic competitiveness of the United States." Nobody tell Chris Mooney.
POWER LINE LOOKS AT THE 1864 DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM, but a reader notes something interesting that they don't highlight. Among the Democrats' complaints about Lincoln is this:
the interference with and denial of the right of the people to bear arms
They don't seem to be talking about state militias, either. (Thanks to Insta-Reader Bruce Stewart for the pointer).
There’s a simple reason that ethanol is popular with politicians: money. Substituting corn ethanol for a large fraction of the gasoline we burn will mean sluicing gushers of cash from more populated states to politically powerful farm states. And a lot of that cash will wind up in the pockets of the big agribusinesses, like Archer Daniels Midland, that dominate ethanol processing—and whose fat checkbooks wield enormous influence in Washington.
I BLAME THE ENVIRONMENT-DESTROYING HALLIBURTON: "An ocean is not the source of the jets emanating from Saturn's moon Enceladus, a new study concludes."
After all, they've already been implicated in Mars scandals.
FRENCH TV. FAKE KILLINGS, AND THE AL DURA SCANDAL: Roger Simon interviews Philippe Karsenty, who was sued by French TV for daring to point out that they were engaged in a blood libel supported by bogus video.
The National Archives is withholding from the public about 2,600 pages of records at President Clinton's direction, despite a public assurance by one of his top aides last month that Mr. Clinton "has not blocked the release of a single document."
Perhaps someone can smuggle out the crucial documents in his/her socks. Apparently, security at the Archives is less than airtight.