Four officers of the Anscombe Society and a prominent conservative politics professor received threatening emails Wednesday evening from off-campus email addresses.
The five individuals received identical messages telling them they would "suffer," ordering them to "shut the fuck up" and declaring that "you are not welcome here." "We will destroy you," the message said.
Though the message did not explicitly mention the Anscombe Society, the four students who received emails were Anscombe vice president Jonathan Hwang '09, president Kevin Staley-Joyce '09, former president Sherif Girgis '08 and administrative committee chair Francisco Nava '09. Politics professor Robert George — who has publicly supported conservative causes, including the Anscombe Society's goal of promoting chastity — also received the message.
I guess it's part of the growing climate of fear in America.
Francisco Nava '09 was physically attacked by two men in Princeton Township Friday evening, sustaining a concussion but no other serious injuries. The assault comes on the heels of several threatening messages recently sent to Nava, apparently in connection with his involvement with the socially conservative Anscombe Society.
I wonder if this will get the kind of attention that politically-reversed assaults would get?
STILL MORE: Andrew Sullivan seems to regard this as an "Insta-Embarrassment." But there's no embarrassment in correcting an error as soon as you're aware of it. That's something that Andrew, and his friends at The New Republic, should have figured out already.
ACE: "Everyone's always clamoring for more art coverage on this blog, so here you go."
I MENTIONED blogger-turned-Supreme Court clerk Will Baude the other day (not actually the first such, but the latest) and now I see that he's got an interesting article out. Topic: "When an Article III court decides a case, and the President disagrees with the outcome, what can he do about it?"
GPS UPDATE: So I wound up ordering the Garmin Nuvi 660 instead of the 350 I mentioned earlier. Everyone who emailed about the 350 loved it, but the 660 gives me bluetooth (which I may care about) and traffic alerts/rerouting, which I definitely do care about. I've often had the experience of being on a trip and stuck in traffic, and wishing I knew local conditions well enough to find a way around the jam. I'll let you know how it works out.
A FISCAL CRISIS IN CALIFORNIA? Ed Morrissey notes that the inability to restrain spending has made this inevitable, and suggests that the likely outcome is a tax increase justified by the crisis.
I've just been reading Daniel Weintraub's excellent Party of One: Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Rise of the Independent Voter, which comes out in a couple of weeks, and you can certainly see how Schwarzenegger's compassionate-conservative approach, coupled with the inbred, gerrymandered lack of accountability in the California legislature, made this inevitable. I predict that Schwarzenegger will announce a "compromise" tax increase based on the "emergency," with some cosmetic budget cuts that won't really amount to much. But I could be wrong -- as Weintraub's book notes, Schwarzenegger is a canny politician in many ways. However, his budget approach seems to have been based on kicking the can down the road, and that only works for so long. Meanwhile, I'm reminded of Poul Anderson's statement that "compassionate government" is a code phrase meaning that there will be absolutely no compassion for the taxpayer.
RUDY DOESN'T REMIND ME OF REAGAN particularly, but this new video has overtones of both "Morning In America" and "There's A Bear In The Woods."
FIRST CLINTON, NOW HUCKABEE: Clemency for political cash? Is this some kind of Arkansas thing? (In Tennessee they just pocket the cash.)
UPDATE: I should have done it sooner, but I just looked to see what Arkansas blogger Freeman Hunt thinks of Huckabee. Uh oh.
WHAT THE OTHER REPUBLICANS can learn from Ron Paul. "One shame of this race is that for all the enthusiasm the Texan has generated among voters, he hasn't managed to pressure the front-runners toward his positions. His more kooky views (say, his belief in a conspiracy to create a 'North American Union') and his violent antiwar talk have allowed the other aspirants to dismiss him. They shouldn't dismiss the passion he's tapped. If Mr. Paul has shown anything, it's that many conservative voters continue to doubt there's anything 'heroic' or 'compassionate' in a ballooning government that sucks up their dollars to aid a dysfunctional state. When Mr. Paul gracefully exits this race, his followers will be looking for an alternative to take up that cause. Any takers?"
I see more on-the-ground energy for Ron Paul in my neck of the woods than for any other Republican candidate except Fred Thompson, who has a local advantage -- and who, interestingly, is more of a small-government type than any of the other GOP candidates himself.
DISTRUST OF BIG MEDIA IS WIDESPREAD, outside the United States as well as at home. "In the United States, Britain and Germany, only around 29% of those interviewed thought their media did a good job in reporting news accurately."
IX-NAY ON THE IHAD-JAY. Second thoughts on jihad from an influential Muslim thinker.
A LIST OF THIS YEAR'S most popular toys. I have to say that the bionic eye seems kind of cool. I would have loved it when I was a kid.
UPDATE: Just went online to order some presents for nieces and nephews, and a lot of stuff's starting to sell out. Plus, surprisingly, some of the Amazon third-party suppliers are showing problems with delivery in time for Christmas even on items that are in stock, though Amazon itself still seems okay. But I wouldn't recommend putting things off much longer if you're planning to order online.
WE STILL DON'T KNOW WHO WILL WIN, but the big loser in Iowa is clearly Carolyn Washburn, together with the Des Moines Register. No wonder the Thompson campaign is using her as a foil.
THE TRUTH IS OPTIONAL: BE SURE TO SUCK UP TO THE OMBUDSMAN -- because correcting factual errors about you isn't something you're entitled to, you know.
A REVIEW OF CHARLIE WILSON'S WAR, from Extreme Mortman. "Sorkin’s style has transitioned from trademark and distinctive to annoying and farcical. And his heavy touch with music absolves the audience of any requirement to think for themselves." But read the whole thing.
DESPERATION MODE? "There must be at least something to that purported Sunday New York Times piece on questionable Clinton Library donors. Dismissing the attacks on Clinton, Inc for going negative on Obama, Bill Clinton kept them up while on with Charlie Rose. One has to wonder if, knowing some mud was coming their way from the New York Times, they didn't opt to drag Obama down into it first. If you doubted the Obama drug smear was a planned attack, you can pretty much get over that thought now."
UPDATE: More here. And Marc Ambinder has a post, too. And there are some angry Obama fans in the comments.
This underscores a problem for Hillary -- if she beats Obama, but in a way that Obama supporters think is dirty, via smears or excessive reliance on "superdelegate" votes -- they may not turn out in November. If she doesn't pull out all the stops, though, she may not win the nomination. And this has to bother Bill, who managed to retire undefeated, by sullying his legacy since her loss will reflect badly on him.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Juan Paxety emails:
An interesting post on potential dissatisfied Obama voters if Hillary wins. But what will the reaction be when the Obama voters realize that Florida and Michigan, two states with substantial minority populations that might be prone to support Obama, will not be allowed to have delegates at the Democratic Convention?
This is not the first time the Democrats have pulled a similar stunt. In 1968, before the street demonstrations, the Democrats packed the convention balconies with "observers" then took a voice vote on whether to seat the legal delegations from several Southern states. The "observers" could clearly be seen shouting votes to remove the delegates. The Georgia delegation was replaced by one led by Julian Bond, of all people. Georgians fled the Democratic Party in droves and didn't support another Democrat for President until Jimmy Carter ran in 1976.
Will the Obama supporters similarly abandon Hillary in the fall?
Yes, this is an issue. If Hillary beats Obama soundly in the early primaries that's one thing. If it's close, and it looks like she's won by smears, or by clever insider manipulation, then she may lose not only Obama supporters, but black voters who are generally supportive of the Clintons. On the other hand, with Obama looking strong, she may not win the nomination without playing those cards. The best thing for the Democratic Party, of course, would be for her to play it clean, ensuring that whoever wins the nomination is in a better position to win the general election. Evidence to date, however, suggests that she'll do what most candidates do -- whatever it takes to win the nomination, and try to deal with the general election problems when they arise.
THE INNER LIFE OF A CELL: A cool video from Harvard. This link may not be permanent -- it works fine now, but it's a frontpage link -- so here's a YouTube link, too, for people who come to this post later. Thanks to reader Michael Segal for the tip.
Two members of a prison-based Islamic terrorist cell that authorities say was poised to attack military sites, synagogues and other targets across Southern California pleaded guilty in federal court Friday to conspiring to wage war against the United States.
The plot, which police stumbled upon during a routine investigation into a gas station holdup, represented one of the most realistic terrorism threats on U.S. soil since Sept. 11, experts said. The case also raised concerns about whether the country's prisons could serve as recruiting centers for Islamic extremists.
"Could"? Seems like we know the answer already. More here:
It was not the most spectacular domestic terrorism plot since the Sept. 11 attacks, and certainly not the best-known.
But no other case posed such a real and immediate threat as the audacious scheme to attack more than a dozen military centers, synagogues and other sites in Southern California, experts said Thursday. . . .
The case illustrated how quickly authorities must be prepared to move in the event of an actual terrorist threat, they said. In a matter of weeks, the FBI, Los Angeles and Torrance police departments and two dozen other agencies conducted 19 searches, seized two dozen computer hard drives and examined about 53,000 documents, all without the normal luxury of moving at their own pace with undercover informants, surveillance and wiretaps.
The plotters "were flying dangerously below the radar," said the FBI's John Miller, who was the LAPD's counter-terrorism head at the time the case broke. He added that the defendants had robbed gas stations for the money to buy rifles, had picked their targets and had set a date.
"The clock was ticking. All they needed to do was to start killing," he said.
The prison-hatched scheme raised another fear in U.S. counter-terrorism circles, particularly within California, which has the nation's largest inmate population: Were there other members of the conspiracy, spawned in cellblocks and prison libraries, preparing to carry on the plan?
It's a bad idea to keep so many people in prison, and it's a worse idea to do so and then have them exposed to radical "clerics."
SHOCKINGLY, THE SCIENCE behind the new Will Smith vehicle, I am Legend -- which sounds like a remake of The Omega Man -- turns out to be bogus.
UPDATE: A bunch of readers email that, in fact, both movies are based on the same book. So I was right, though in ignorance.
FRED THOMPSON'S CAMPAIGN is trying to get 2400 donors in 24 hours. They're pushing the "show of hands" video and asking "Don't you want a conservative leader who won't grovel to the liberal media?"
TIM NOAH: "The big-picture political story of the 2008 presidential election is the disenfranchisement of the primary voter."
In the movie "Animal House," the fraternity brother known as Otter reacts to the Delta House's closure with the classic line, "I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part." To which Bluto, played by John Belushi, replies, "We're just the guys to do it." The movie ends by noting that Bluto becomes a Senator, so perhaps this explains the meltdown among Democrats on Capitol Hill.
Memo to Congress: We're not laughing with you. We're laughing at you.
Wyoming's Democratic Party chairman says that Hillary Clinton will "completely reverse" progress the party has made in that state and that "most voters in Wyoming seem to hate Hillary Clinton."
HEY, YOU DON'T NEED TO WORRY IF THE BATTERY'S CHARGED: "Sony on Thursday unveiled a prototype digital camera shaped like a pizza cutter with a wheel that can be turned to generate enough power to take pictures." I don't think it'll sell, though.
VIDEO: chugging water at record speed. Just stay away from the vodka. "A man nearly died from alcohol poisoning after quaffing a liter (two pints) of vodka at an airport security check instead of handing it over to comply with new carry-on rules, police said Wednesday."
REPORTING FROM THE digital video expo. This hurts: "Panasonic's AG-HMC70 is a low-cost, solid-state, shoulder-mounted HD camera. Sporting an array of pro features -- balanced audio inputs (bottom), HDMI outputs, AVCHD codec and an adjustable eyepiece -- this new camera will be quite a deal when it's released at around $1,200."
And I know the reason for the price plunge . . . . .
Plus, convert old movies to digital video at home.
WASHBURN BOMBS: "You know you’re in really sorry shape as a presidential debate moderator when another member of the press — a far more famous and powerful member — demands your resignation." I'm almost starting to feel sorry for her.
GPS UPDATE: So after all the discussion yesterday, I'm thinking of getting the Garmin nüvi 350 -- price has been chopped and it does very well in customer reviews. Anybody out there got one?
OUCH: "Hurrying in after the signing was over and signing the EU 'Reform' Treaty by himself, Gordon Brown reminded me of King John when he became a vassal of the Pope and made England a fiefdom of the Papacy. Like John, he was thinking only of himself."
LEFT AND RIGHT COME TOGETHER in mocking dumb attacks on citizen journalism.
NAOMI NOVIK FOUNDS THE ORGANIZATION FOR TRANSFORMATIVE WORKS. It's designed to promote fan fiction and fan culture. Website is here. I'm quite a fan of Novik's -- as some readers may recall, she won this year's John W. Campbell award.
FICTIONAL CHARACTERS IN THE NEWS: This must be part of that journalistic "professionalism" we've been lectured about. "Evidence contrary to that narrative is not fit to print."
CRITICIZING THE HUFFINGTON POST'S business model. Though the criticism comes across as a bit jealous.
FINISHED READING S.M. STIRLING'S In the Court of the Crimson Kings last night. I enjoyed it very much; it's one of those books whose feel sticks with you overnight, always a good sign. (Plus the cool King Crimson reference in the title). It's a sequel to The Sky People, and part of his effort to update Burroughs-era pulp to the 21st Century. I was a bit skeptical of this when I first heard of it, but he's definitely pulled it off. Here's the interview where he described the series:
Right now I'm working on an alternate history series which might be summed up as "What if the background of some of the pulps existed in the real world?"
In the 1950's, we discovered that Earth was definitely the sole inhabitable planet in this solar system, which was a terrible blow to traditional SF.
In my new alternate history, we discover instead that we have two other habitable, and in fact inhabited, planets. Mars is a cold, dry world of ancient ruined cities, thinly peopled by the decadent descendants of lost civilizations (or are they?); Venus a hot, wet, fecund one of primitive humans (and other hominids) with an archaic fauna.
Then I try to treat everything else in as densely realistic a style as I can. It makes for an interesting contrast.
It does.
ENERGY BILL UPDATE: "Senate Democrats yesterday bowed to Republicans and stripped a proposed tax increase for oil companies from a broad energy bill, clearing the way for passage of the measure that includes the first increase in vehicle gas-mileage standards in 32 years."
BETTER THAN BRINKS: "Lexington Police say a woman shot Joshua W. Harrison, 27 of 3008 Maddie Lane, who was trying to get in a window. Harrison was shot in the lower torso. He was taken to UK Hospital with non-life threatening injuries. Harrison is charged with burglary in 2nd degree and is being held in the Fayette County Detention Center."
CAIR VS. TALK RADIO: Apparently Baghdad Bob is doing their PR.
THE AGONY OF VICTORY, and not the thrill of defeat. Blackfive looks at Pelosi's latest misstep. Video here. More thoughts from Bryan Preston.
OBESITY AND POLITICS -- but the best line is from the comments: "They are going to take potato chips from us for the common good."
Plus, a solution: "Maybe all those fat people should start smoking again." Hmm. Smoking goes down, obesity goes up. I wonder if this is another unintended consequence of government action . . . .
ABC: Eyewitness Account of Huge Taliban Defeat. May there be many more, until they're all out of the picture. It seems to me, though, that this sentence reveals a lot about both the war, and modern journalism: "While hundreds of Taliban are believed to have been killed, two British soldiers and one American soldier lost their lives."
UPDATE: Reader Alex Gadea emails:
I love your posts, but I don't think you are being fair to Stephen Grey, the writer of the Blotter article on the fighting in Afghanistan. I believe he is saying that it only cost 3 coalition lives to rout the Taliban, and even those were lost not due to anything the Taliban were able to do but by mines left by Soviet forces in the 80s. Grey appears to be actually be underlining how powerful and successful the attack was and does not seem to be making the invidious comparison that you seem to feel he does. I do believe the MSM has been attrocious and avidly anti-american in their coverage of Afghanistan and Iraq, but don't allow anger over that to strike at someone who actually seems to be given an honest accounting.
Fair enough. The report is quite good -- I just found the turn of phrase odd.
BLOGGER WILL BAUDE, a founder of Crescat Sententia, will be clerking for Chief Justice Roberts. Congratulations, Will! This'll continue to put a dent in his blogging career, but I hope he'll be back in the 'sphere one day.
CARBON TAXATION without representation. How about we require that delegates to the U.N. General Assembly be democratically elected?
YALE'S REALLY RICH. TOM SMITH OBSERVES: "I have thought of asking Yale to stop writing and asking me for money. But why should I? I like getting the letters. They fill me with a kind of awe. They remind me that greatness comes to those who dare to ask for more than anyone can possibly think they deserve. They fascinate me. What can they possibly say to make me think I should send what $50, $100? to the people who are making 28% a year on $22.5 Billion? They say they need the money, which cannot be true, except in the sense of me and the beggar. I am astonished."
SCRAMJET PROGRESS: I could go for the two-hour New York to Tokyo flights. The missiles, not so much.
AL QAEDA IN LONDON: "Investigators examining the bungled terrorist attacks in London and Glasgow six months ago believe the plotters had a link to Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, which would make the attacks the first that the group has been involved in outside of the Middle East, according to senior officials from three countries who have been briefed on the inquiry."
"Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia" is what the New York Times calls Al Qaeda in Iraq.
IF YOU MISSED IT ON XM RADIO, the latest PJM Political is now online.
Yep. Which is pretty much how it works now. Journalism isn't a profession, it's an activity -- and often those who engage in it for a living act pretty unprofessionally. Or just write lame, self-serving columns.
And Bill Quick comments: "Your reputation wasn’t murdered, dummy. It was a victim of suicide." And here's an intimation of an agenda:
This goes back to lobbying for H. R. 2102, now in the Senate. The bill would provide legal exemptions and a federal "shield law" for journalists, but only for "professional journalists." Anyone not making a living at journalism would not be covered. More here.
Next comes the push for licensing legislation. It's an attempt at establishing a monopoly protection act, and reserving freedom of the press for "professionals." Funny, I don't recall such an exclusion in the First Amendment--but that's what they'll claim as they go forward.
No doubt.
MORE: Hell, Big Media types can't even read money.
LET THEM EAT CAKE: Ron Bailey reports from Bali: "Is threatening to confiscate their patents really the way to encourage companies and inventors to invest in creating the innovative low-carbon energy technologies that world is being told are vital to stopping dangerous climate change?"
A DEM DEBATE ROUNDUP: "Democratic presidential hopefuls called for higher taxes on the highest-paid Americans and on big corporations Thursday and agreed in an unusually cordial debate that any thought of balancing the federal budget would have to wait."
A BIG CHRISTMAS GPS sale at Amazon. Maybe I should crack and finally buy one. But I'm pretty good about finding my way around, and I'm afraid my skills will atrophy if I have a box on the dashboard telling me where to turn. Am I wrong?
UPDATE: Lots of responses, so I'm bumping this. Reader Jane Woodworth says I'm right to worry:
I recently bought a car with a GPS system, automatic headlights, a camera that shows you what you are backing into, a keyless ignition and a few other current conveniences.
I can say categorically that I am now too stupid to drive an ordinary car. As evidence I took my business partner's car recently, and not only left the lights on but left the car running until the battery died.
I am now absolutely too dumbed down to drive a lawn mower, never mind a normal car. I say fight the urge.
Matthew Cowles says not so much:
Yes, it's possible that a person's navigation skills might atrophy as a result of using a portable GPS. But I've been a flight instructor and consider my navigation skills pretty good, and I'd still say that that's a bit like being afraid that getting a typewriter will cause a person's penmanship to deteriorate.
Portable GPSes aren't useful all that often because, pretty much by definition, people mostly go to places they're familiar with. But when they are useful, they're very useful indeed.
I have a review that's about a year old (and therefore not directly useful) of the Magellan 2200T that explains my opinion.
Tom Ussery says don't worry:
Do yourself a favor and get one. I thought the same until I bought an Acura TL with the navigation system. I have never looked back, and my manliness, and internal compass-direction finding ability has just been enhanced, not hindered.
That's a relief. Reader Henry David says go for it:
I have had two Garmin Nuvi 660's ( one was stolen ) and would not drive without a GPS.
Two big deals - 1. Traffic report is great !!! I check out where the congestion is before I head off.
2. The device calculates and updates my arrival time - I don't have to guess if I'm running on time, and 3. It counts down miles to the next waypoint.
Of course I'm in LA and its very very big with lots of alternate routes if you have a heads up.
Well, that describes Knoxville, too. And Mason Kidd says I've got it backward:
Concerning your post on getting a GPS. I too thought the same thing - that with a GPS unit I would become reliant on it and lose my skills with directions. We got a new car with a navigation system in it, and I've found the opposite to be true. Having a map in front of me while driving allows me to visualize things much better, and remember the layout of those streets better in the future. The key has been to not actually use the turn-by-turn directions unless really necessary.
Good suggestion.
MORE: Reader Rick Lang emails:
I'm a retired AF F-15 Pilot and thought pretty much the same as you. My wife however is "directionally challenged", so when we bought her a new car, I went ahead and got one. I thought it was pretty cool, find the nearest McDonalds or Gas Station. Not really necessary though. But when we took her car and my dad to my son's college graduation and while we were transiting Austin, he went into hypoglycemic shock. Two clicks on the GPS and we're getting turn by turn to the nearest hospital. Long story short ALL my vehicles have one now.
Good point.
STILL MORE: Some further thoughts from Kim du Toit, whose situation seems like mine.
NOT QUITE BRINKS SECURITY: "A female homeowner who shot a male intruder in her back yard in October 2006 spoke to KNBC's Laurel Erickson on Wednesday, one day after a jury found the man guilty of all charges. Nadine Teter shot Michael Lugo twice in the stomach and once in the leg after he broke into her Canyon Country home. Lugo broke the lock on Teter's door and barged in. She fled to the back yard with her gun, according to police. . . . Teter said she thinks that every woman should carry a gun. . . . 'I was not going to get raped. I was not going to get murdered. There was no way -- and I didn't,' Teter said."
DAVID GULLIVER: "You know, if the general election is Hillary against Huckabee, Hillary just might prove correct in her thesis that many Republican women will vote for her."
I WAS JUST CLEANING OUT MY OFFICE and looking at the September, 2007 issue of the ABA Journal, in which the war on terror received a D+. Now I see that the ABA Journal has made Alberto Gonzales its Lawyer of the Year.
ANOTHER DEBATE? Jeralyn Merritt is liveblogging the Democrats in Iowa.
UPDATE: Not just an isolated phenomenon, apparently. Albuquerque reader Karim Fattah emails: "Maybe the red-light cameras can be recycled and used as targets at shooting ranges. That's about the only way they'll be popular with the public."
LEE HARRIS ON UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: "It is simply a myth to believe that only interventionism yields unintended consequence, since doing nothing at all may produce the same unexpected results. If American foreign policy had followed a course of strict non-interventionism, the world would certainly be different from what it is today; but there is no obvious reason to think that it would have been better."
QUESTIONS POSED by big universities with bigger endowments: "In the present circumstances, the administration and boards of these schools now control the money because the endowment is managed by internally controlled entities. Accordingly, the most important voice at Yale would have to be the estimable and much-respected David Swenson, who has managed the Yale endowment to astonishing annual returns of over 20% for 10 years. Yale's endowment is about $22.5 billion. What does this mean for the future of governance at Yale? I wonder."
Several Canadian Islamic groups have had the decency to deplore the slaying, which seems to have been carried out with the collusion of Aqsa’s brothers. Yet in an exquisite demonstration of moral equivalence, Shahina Siddiqui, the Canadian-based executive director of the Islamic Social Services Association of the United States and Canada, said:
“The strangulation death of Ms. Parvez was the result of domestic violence, a problem that cuts across Canadian society and is blind to color or creed.”
Oh, no, it doesn’t, Ms. Siddiqui, not this type of domestic violence, nor this particular crime: This was Shariah-based justice meted out to a Muslim girl for defying her fundamentalist father.
It was, and it shouldn't get a multi-culti pass.
THIS IS JUST WRONG: "Amazon.com may not offer free delivery on books in France, the high court in Versailles has ruled."
ROBERT KAPLAN ON CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS: "It is obvious that a military can only fight well on behalf of a society in which it believes, and that a society which believes little is worth fighting for cannot, in the end, field an effective military."
Read the whole thing. Though where he says "society," he's talking more about elite segments thereof.
PEOPLE should sit outside in the middle of the day to help stave off potential deadly medical conditions, an Australian researcher says.
Current recommendations about when people should be exposed to the sun the most were wrong and did not allow people to get enough vitamin D, according to David Turnbull, a research fellow at the University of Southern Queensland’s Centre for Rural and Remote Area Health.
Vitamin D, when absorbed through the skin from UV rays, has been found to help prevent various cancers, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. . . . “In the US, between 50,000 and 60,000 people die each year because of issues relating to not getting enough sun exposure,” he said.
Last month, researchers from King’s College London released a report linking vitamin D with slowing ageing in women.
The British study found more sunshine could also cut the risk of age-related illnesses such as heart disease.
I've always been skeptical of the extreme sun-phobia we've seen from dermatologists, etc. This suggests that I was right -- but read the whole thing.
THE FBI AND IRS INVESTIGATE AL SHARPTON: "The FBI and IRS are investigating whether Sharpton improperly misstated the amount of money he raised during his 2004 White House run to illegally obtain federal matching funds, a source familiar with the probe said. . . . The feds are also looking into allegations of tax fraud, including whether Sharpton commingled funds from his nonprofit National Action Network with several of his for-profit ventures, the source said."
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: Some good news on the pork front:
It’s not just another day in the nation’s capital. At 11:30 a.m., Office of Management and Budget Director Jim Nussle and Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., will throw the switch on a new landmark of government, USASpending.gov. Mandated by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA), which was co-sponsored by Coburn and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., USASpending.gov is a searchable, Googlelike database that puts most federal spending within a few mouse clicks for every American. (Obama won’t be present at today’s activities because he is on the presidential campaign trail.) . . . .
There are innumerable reasons why the establishment of USASpending.gov is a milestone, but two of them are particularly worthy of mention. First, Coburn and Obama drew little attention when they introduced FFATA and the bill mostly flew under the radar as it progressed in Congress. But when passage became a real possibility, the Old Bulls in Congress — ever jealous of their ability to spend our tax dollars on their pet causes — used every legislative trick in the book trying to stop FFATA. Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, and Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., even placed secret holds on the measure, stalling it for weeks in the Senate. But they were unmasked by Porkbusters.org, an Internet-based coalition from across the ideological spectrum.
Porkbusters.org sparked thousands of phone calls and e-mails asking senators if they were responsible for the secret holds. Stevens and Byrd soon gave up and within a few weeks Bush signed the bill into law.
Second, it may take a few years before the good effects of USASpending.gov are fully felt, but here’s fair warning to the old-school politicians who thrive on pork-barrel politics: It’s no longer just the dwindling ranks of the mainstream media covering the big spenders. Starting today, legions of citizens and professional watchdogs have access to an unprecedented amount of information and data on where tax dollars are going. And they’re all connected via the Internet. The pig roast with tax dollars as the main course is coming to an end.
JOE GANDELMAN on the Hillary / Obama drug flap: "It negates all the imagery the campaign did early on to create a more likeable Hillary Clinton." And that's just the beginning of his complaints. Read the whole thing.
In the 1990s, the Clinton's mastered the art of having surrogates say things about their enemies while claiming to be aloof from it. This was James Carville's act for pretty much the entire second term. Sid Blumenthal was employed for similar purposes.
So when the Clinton team's top man in New Hampshire attacks Barack Obama's past drug use (couched in the "concern" that the GOP will make an issue of it if he wins the nomination) and then "disavows" the comments I find it hard to believe anyone is buying. For months we've been told how disciplined this campaign is and now that the polls aren't going her way this happens by accident? Nah-ah.
It's a very different political -- and media -- environment now. Have the Clintons kept up?
UPDATE: Blowback. "Believe me, the last thing Hillary Clinton wants is for anyone on her campaign or any other campaign to start looking into drug use. Especially for Candidates shacking up in Berkeley, just down from Telegraph Avenue, in the lovin' summer of 1971."
IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE. Unless, apparently, you're in law enforcement.
ANOTHER PAN FOR IOWA: "The biggest loser in today's debate by far was PBS, whose tightly wound Des Moines Register schoolmarm moderator Carole Washburn did not allow any lengthy answers, nor meaningful exchanges between the candidates; she only wanted 30 second sound bytes, and it was an abject lesson in how NOT to conduct a debate about something as serious as choosing our next President."
UPDATE: Heh: “What the hell was Keyes doing anywhere near real candidates? Did PBS feel the need to bring someone new in to make Ron Paul look sane? And did anyone let the Secret Service know that Keyes was going to be near the real candidates?”
Okay, it was soporific. It went nowhere. It was largely a recitation of position papers. With all due respect to a newspaper editor who's not expected to be a hotshot TV performer--and even by the standards of famous-for-being-nice Iowa--the Register's Carolyn Washburn in Iowa seemed unfamiliar with such concepts as the followup question, or contrasting one candidate's position with another. She even asked them for new year's resolutions!
And what's with refusing to ask about immigration or terrorism?
Not a great job.
GOOD NEWS: "Americans may be too fat, but at least their cholesterol is low. For the first time in nearly 50 years, the average cholesterol level for U.S. adults is in the ideal range, the government reported Wednesday." I blame those evil drug companies. And I'm right to: "The growing use of cholesterol-lowering pills in middle-aged and older people is believed to be a key reason for the improvement, experts said. When the survey began in 1960, the average cholesterol was at 222."
For six years, Central Intelligence Agency officers have worried that someday the tide of post-Sept. 11 opinion would turn, and their harsh treatment of prisoners from Al Qaeda would be subjected to hostile scrutiny and possible criminal prosecution.
Now that day may have arrived, after years of shifting legal advice, searing criticism from rights groups — and no new terrorist attacks on American soil.
The Justice Department, which in 2002 gave the C.I.A. legal approval for waterboarding and other tough interrogation methods, is reviewing whether agency officials broke the law by destroying videotapes of those very methods.
The Congressional intelligence committees, whose leaders in 2002 gave at least tacit approval for the tough tactics, have voted in conference to ban all coercive techniques, and they have announced investigations of the destruction of the videotapes and the methods they documented.
“Exactly what they feared is what’s happening,” Jack Goldsmith, the former head of the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department, said of the C.I.A. officials he advised in that job. “The winds change, and the recriminations begin.”
Or as they said in Animal House, "You f*cked up. You trusted us."
UPDATE: Attorney Fritz Schranck emails:
Seeing your Animal House reference in this post brought a smile.
In discussions with my clients and others, I often refer to this pivotal moment in film history, and call it either The Flounder Rule or The Flounder Principle, in honor of the original recipient of this comment.
It's a highly useful explanation for a lot of stuff in life in general and government life in particular.
OUCH: "To bring it full circle, Keyes's distracting presence was yet another indictment of the unworthiness of the Iowa media for the enormous role it plays in this process."
POSSIBLY PRESAGING PROBLEMS FOR THE G.O.P. IN 2008: "Idaho's senators are blocking President Bush's nominee to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, saying the agency has become overly aggressive in enforcing gun laws."
PERRY DE HAVILLAND: "Yes, it is true. I am going to go and sign the treaty for the European Constitution on behalf of Belgium. . . . If the people who were voted out of office in Belgium months ago can sign the treaty, then why not me too?" Plus, Perry will look far more dashing while he does it.
WHEN I WATCH BRINKS HOME SECURITY COMMERCIALS LIKE THIS ONE, I think that the nice lady might be safer from the evil intruder if she had a gun, instead of a telephone and a siren. Of course if Brinks home security offered this degree of service, it might be different . . . .
UPDATE: An alternate commercial, from reader Peter Gookins:
Alarm going off.
Other sounds.
Phone rings.
Customer: Hello
Brinks: Ma'am, this is Brink's. Is everything all right?
Customer: Well, there's a dead guy on the porch and empty brass all over
my family room. Can you send help?
Brinks: We'll dispatch the maid service right away.
They're not very smart at Best Buy. If I owned stock, I'd sell it. And threatening bloggers, especially when you're not very smart, is . . . even more not very smart. At least they apologized. I hope that those responsible have been sacked. And replaced by Llamas.
IT'S NOT JUST HYBRIDS -- clean diesels are coming on strong.
HEH: From the comments to this post: "The MSM interprets truth as damage, and routes around it."
SEPARATED AT BIRTH? Reader C.R. Scott sees something familiar about Mike Huckabee. "My wife pointed out to me that Huckabee is the spitting image of Gomer Pyle. No wonder the Dems are angling him to win!"
AN INTERVIEW WITH HUCKABEE'S CAMPAIGN MANAGER, Chip Saltsman.
DECLAN MCCULLAGH: "A top Republican in the House of Representatives is demanding that Google answer a barrage of questions about privacy, some of which are related to the company's proposed purchase of the DoubleClick advertising firm." Plus, a handy chart of various search engines' privacy policies.
RON BAILEY FILES another report from Bali. John Kerry is there! "The venue at the Grand Hyatt was packed with people eager to get a look at the anti-George W. Bush, or at least the best stand-in until newly minted Nobel Peace Laureate Al Gore arrives later this week." Excitement abounds.
Or you can get a big honking battery. (Some useful backup power advice in general at the link, too.) Or you can always power your house with a Prius!
UPDATE: Some generator advice from Bart Hall: "Yesterday we toasted a couple of transformers (router and furnace) because the generator was cranking out 160 volts instead of 120V. We've used this generator without problem for years, but evidently there was either a short in the field or the voltage regulator failed, and it'll cost us well over a hundred bucks, not counting repairs to the generator itself. Henceforth I'll meter the output before backfeeding the house, and recommend you do the same."
WHY POLICE DON'T WANT YOU TO RECORD THEM: "A teenage suspect who secretly recorded his interrogation on an MP3 player has landed a veteran detective in the middle of perjury charges, authorities said Thursday." (Via Volokh.)
HEH: "Well, it's a pleasure to welcome Mrs. Clinton to the Second Amendment side of the debate. "
A year ago, Democrats won control of Congress in part by criticizing billions of dollars spent on pet projects. Now, freshmen Democrats are benefiting from the same kind of spending, a USA TODAY analysis shows.
All 49 of the new Democratic lawmakers sponsored or co-sponsored at least one project — known as an "earmark" — inserted into the House and Senate spending bills, the analysis found. Freshmen Democrats were the sole sponsors on projects worth $351 million, an average of $7.6 million. Republicans got approval for projects worth $65 million, or $5 million each.
The analysis found that some of the most vulnerable freshmen Democrats in next year's election were among those who got the most money. . . . Democratic candidates criticized Republican incumbents last year for abusing earmarks. Patrick Murphy attacked then-representative Mike Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., during a debate for failing to make the "tough decisions" on a transportation bill heavy with earmarks, the Bucks County Courier Times reported. Now a representative, Murphy sponsored $11.8 million for local projects and businesses — fourth-highest among House and Senate freshmen.